linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
	Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] drivers/base/node: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:38:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96f7d3a2-2d85-442c-a9f7-e558d4a2ba06@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a0a05c2dffc62a742bf1dd030098be4ce99be28.1748452241.git.donettom@linux.ibm.com>

On 28.05.25 19:18, Donet Tom wrote:
> During node device initialization, `memory blocks` are registered under
> each NUMA node. The `memory blocks` to be registered are identified using
> the node’s start and end PFNs, which are obtained from the node's pg_data
> 
> However, not all PFNs within this range necessarily belong to the same
> node—some may belong to other nodes. Additionally, due to the
> discontiguous nature of physical memory, certain sections within a
> `memory block` may be absent.
> 
> As a result, `memory blocks` that fall between a node’s start and end
> PFNs may span across multiple nodes, and some sections within those blocks
> may be missing. `Memory blocks` have a fixed size, which is architecture
> dependent.
> 
> Due to these considerations, the memory block registration is currently
> performed as follows:
> 
> for_each_online_node(nid):
>      start_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn;
>      end_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn + node_spanned_pages;
>      for_each_memory_block_between(PFN_PHYS(start_pfn), PFN_PHYS(end_pfn))
>          mem_blk = memory_block_id(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
>          pfn_mb_start=section_nr_to_pfn(mem_blk->start_section_nr)
>          pfn_mb_end = pfn_start + memory_block_pfns - 1
>          for (pfn = pfn_mb_start; pfn < pfn_mb_end; pfn++):
>              if (get_nid_for_pfn(pfn) != nid):
>                  continue;
>              else
>                  do_register_memory_block_under_node(nid, mem_blk,
>                                                          MEMINIT_EARLY);
> 
> Here, we derive the start and end PFNs from the node's pg_data, then
> determine the memory blocks that may belong to the node. For each
> `memory block` in this range, we inspect all PFNs it contains and check
> their associated NUMA node ID. If a PFN within the block matches the
> current node, the memory block is registered under that node.
> 
> If CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, get_nid_for_pfn() performs
> a binary search in the `memblock regions` to determine the NUMA node ID
> for a given PFN. If it is not enabled, the node ID is retrieved directly
> from the struct page.
> 
> On large systems, this process can become time-consuming, especially since
> we iterate over each `memory block` and all PFNs within it until a match is
> found. When CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, the additional
> overhead of the binary search increases the execution time significantly,
> potentially leading to soft lockups during boot.
> 
> In this patch, we iterate over `memblock region` to identify the
> `memory blocks` that belong to the current NUMA node. `memblock regions`
> are contiguous memory ranges, each associated with a single NUMA node, and
> they do not span across multiple nodes.
> 
> for_each_memory_region(r): // r => region
>    if (!node_online(r->nid)):
>      continue;
>    else
>      for_each_memory_block_between(r->base, r->base + r->size - 1):
>        do_register_memory_block_under_node(r->nid, mem_blk, MEMINIT_EARLY);
> 
> We iterate over all memblock regions, and if the node associated with the
> region is online, we calculate the start and end memory blocks based on the
> region's start and end PFNs. We then register all the memory blocks within
> that range under the region node.
> 
> Test Results on My system with 32TB RAM
> =======================================
> 1. Boot time with CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT enabled.
> 
> Without this patch
> ------------------
> Startup finished in 1min 16.528s (kernel)
> 
> With this patch
> ---------------
> Startup finished in 17.236s (kernel) - 78% Improvement
> 
> 2. Boot time with CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT disabled.
> 
> Without this patch
> ------------------
> Startup finished in 28.320s (kernel)
> 
> With this patch
> ---------------
> Startup finished in 15.621s (kernel) - 46% Improvement
> 
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> ---

[...]

>   #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>   void memory_block_add_nid(struct memory_block *mem, int nid,
>   			  enum meminit_context context);
> @@ -188,5 +206,4 @@ void memory_block_add_nid(struct memory_block *mem, int nid,
>    * can sleep.
>    */
>   extern struct mutex text_mutex;
> -

^ Nit: unrelated change?

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-04  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-28 17:18 [PATCH v7 1/5] drivers/base/node: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time Donet Tom
2025-05-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] drivers/base/node: remove register_mem_block_under_node_early() Donet Tom
2025-05-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] drivers/base/node: Remove register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node Donet Tom
2025-05-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] drivers/base/node: Rename register_memory_blocks_under_node() and remove context argument Donet Tom
2025-05-28 17:18 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] drivers/base/node: Rename __register_one_node() to register_one_node() Donet Tom
2025-06-04  3:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] drivers/base/node: Optimize memory block registration to reduce boot time Andrew Morton
2025-06-04  9:45   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 13:17     ` Donet Tom
2025-06-04 13:30       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-04 15:57         ` Donet Tom
2025-06-04 13:25   ` Donet Tom
2025-06-04  9:38 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-06-04 13:27   ` Donet Tom
2025-06-04 13:30     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-09 14:03 ` [Fixup PATCH] drivers/base/node: Restored the removed extra line Donet Tom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96f7d3a2-2d85-442c-a9f7-e558d4a2ba06@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=donettom@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).