From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84432C3DA41 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E0ED96B0088; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:07:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DBED66B0089; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:07:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C88D66B0093; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:07:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0306B0088 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:07:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E7BA0606 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:07:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82327497924.14.D2A1FE7 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E4240002 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=lAJZDMTo; spf=none (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of kan.liang@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.198.163.18) smtp.mailfrom=kan.liang@linux.intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1720703195; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=G2DV+W4ns5n+TyzQv/CKZHDBjCJ0dmEpC6+tsSMnhQI=; b=N5XJd17giS2TJVHBjNdQEQURMXmcdA+hURiMdhpP9fyrBkM/lQArfLbE/5zsccOykPGQ/5 WD3b/XH5t6H09b7SHbS25kZa7+0/Q4HKIf/g++iYjQ9H6cavj3syKfOmmLbds1zLe/6/kv bfivoSIHPn9+SwPpDdBwBZ2zK2ESbYk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=lAJZDMTo; spf=none (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of kan.liang@linux.intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.198.163.18) smtp.mailfrom=kan.liang@linux.intel.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=intel.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1720703195; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kAr3YTOjj8SPp3aARk6HJgvbxtMmH30XJT59mylDtS5Wc5Mv/jFvZjNmkfKS4smv1bfeVN d7s0BATRfRi//WuUaoVc+/414otKiPND+gLYTvRqp8cWOLwdYqb2R0CnJtxvGD5Uj7Kba1 dmW5g9NhezigR46NfOfR7Dgn5BiWEqs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1720703239; x=1752239239; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bw1CDs/sg/K1NvNb66K5hwELjtRSAbZQj0qWX4uUW7M=; b=lAJZDMTokRYcD5KbUIikutl8cONwllnF0K7jZ24RQAydSjWuAf0kqd74 qAzh69svcX5KMS4E0jgTT60rwxWQmPPdHiPi0mL2FB2iq/ZuUqgkU4tAk 5mjgAuDvwDLEPS8TuBd4g0ua9XulZ3M6iZ3bjXSD98y2Lif4H22PFm7qj p4kI4TDpP3OUqKcBhfe5S1ZNX3XjA02tfmlAlGzverAYfO2pHilV2gLu6 4m/2ZKRAjTpNPx4gGCvwQP2dkeblJot9452CfWZ5VTH1GOpWwO/cjMT4H xou9fK6xSIypZpQD45nY6WyGoc9IMKcFH+SKqGqj8A1dh17AIoFS8829T A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zX70ZcJaSu2n2+l9oyLgWw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tnTmALA6T4yrxWMYXAISJg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11130"; a="17695196" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,200,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="17695196" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jul 2024 06:07:06 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: CwCrJuGJTc2wbQHB7kUnAQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hbSYrspaSY2+5GgI4VzO1A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,200,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="53727131" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Jul 2024 06:07:05 -0700 Received: from [10.212.47.156] (kliang2-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com [10.212.47.156]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7561820738F3; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 06:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <98c73f1a-e5e3-4eba-ac52-ccf21e3a063c@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 09:07:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [perf vendor events] e2641db83f: perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail To: Oliver Sang Cc: Ian Rogers , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Linux Memory Management List , Namhyung Kim , Weilin Wang , Caleb Biggers , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: "Liang, Kan" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A0E4240002 X-Stat-Signature: p8zkrpnmjtnxw891n7rys81p3bjkr7xz X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1720703238-840019 X-HE-Meta: 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 LeFQShj3 GIVt2NE6Sn8Urzx149bmP3XnsCHNuPY4PWVEAt7e1vKxVvXlfRti1vWvw4+62+q7oSuApYLjen/OGtx0xmiDLz86B5QUv1imjV6ssDCIQvXUU57k7EQ/8iy8ekJGRw0ATNi1DK0r3fUCpG69PVTSnptdsVCpQbnWtAzEUHum00L2R5lCDkQQlsYG95pPti78AWbJYYwFqwBe0oagKpcekhxuQSFQ2r0PdPM6Mxab8ZZK8rx/KeVR7wqe4UvzAgSjfSwAeqVYJFYLu5ucAPhBwEC+KOknEx9u4bCY5Gp86JhRlgSE0XlVfH5Bxz0BKwdbvpId8av6Hu8WTUSsky2hzeJjvNHxT1nn5wGmOeMyul0M9XXJGprDbcZrN9yhkgTy2NsWzLTbTuadufAfKOw3BZODtYJXWsKLYxVZ+FWSbD7F+mP4= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 2024-07-11 4:04 a.m., Oliver Sang wrote: > hi, Kan, > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:15:05AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote: >> >> >> On 2024-07-10 12:59 a.m., kernel test robot wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> kernel test robot noticed "perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail" on: >>> >>> commit: e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8 ("perf vendor events: Add/update skylake events/metrics") >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master >>> >>> [test failed on linux-next/master 82d01fe6ee52086035b201cfa1410a3b04384257] >>> >>> in testcase: perf-sanity-tests >>> version: >>> with following parameters: >>> >>> perf_compiler: gcc >>> >>> >>> >>> compiler: gcc-13 >>> test machine: 16 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2278G CPU @ 3.40GHz (Coffee Lake) with 32G memory >>> >>> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) >>> >>> >>> we also observed two cases which also failed on parent can pass on this commit. >>> FYI. >>> >>> >>> caccae3ce7b988b6 e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50 >>> ---------------- --------------------------- >>> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs >>> | | | >>> :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_PMU_test.fail >>> :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_metricgroups_test.pass >>> :6 100% 6:6 perf-sanity-tests.perf_all_metrics_test.pass >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of >>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags >>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot >>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com >>> >>> >>> >>> 2024-07-09 07:09:53 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 105 >>> 105: perf all metricgroups test : Ok >>> 2024-07-09 07:10:11 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 106 >>> 106: perf all metrics test : Ok >>> 2024-07-09 07:10:23 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 107 >>> 107: perf all libpfm4 events test : Ok >>> 2024-07-09 07:10:47 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test 108 >>> 108: perf all PMU test : FAILED! >> >> Can you please try the -vvv option, which should tell the failed event? >> perf test -vvv "perf all PMU test" > > after add -vvv: > > 2024-07-11 07:45:20 sudo /usr/src/linux-perf-x86_64-rhel-8.3-bpf-e2641db83f18782f57a0e107c50d2d1731960fb8/tools/perf/perf test -v 108 > 108: perf all PMU test: > --- start --- > test child forked, pid 18989 > Testing (null) The test cases use the "perf list --raw-dump pmu" to get a complete event list. It seems the perf list command got nothing. That's weird. The main change of e2641db83f18 is to add the "Counter" field and a few events. It should not impact the perf list command. What's the output of "perf list --raw-dump pmu" on your machine? Thanks, Kan > ---- end(-1) ---- > 108: perf all PMU test : FAILED! > > >> >> Thanks, >> Kan >>> >>> >>> >>> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: >>> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240710/202407101021.2c8baddb-oliver.sang@intel.com >>> >>> >>> >> >