Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Arya <pranjal.arya@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>,
	Andrew Ballance <andrewjballance@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maple-tree@lists.infradead.org,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@amd.com>,
	Wyes Karny <wkarny@gmail.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/12] mm/vmalloc: migrate vmap_area indexing from rb-tree to maple-tree
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 15:48:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9eca8338-bfcc-4241-954f-2bf2fd14db1d@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ai_LVreyRWx-RDEd@pc636>



On 6/15/2026 3:22 PM, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2026 at 12:15:28AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2026 at 10:49:42PM +0530, Pranjal Arya wrote:
>>> vmalloc's free/busy/lazy area tracking is one of the last remaining
>>> augmented-rb_tree consumers in the core mm allocators. The rest of
>>> mm/ has been gradually consolidating range-keyed indexing around
>>> maple_tree (notably the per-process VMA tree in mm/mmap.c), and
>>> the underlying reason is a structural mismatch between rb_tree and
>>> range tracking:
>>
>> First, and most importantly, I love this.  The maple tree is undoubtedly
>> the right data structure to use for this purpose.
>>
>> What I don't understand is why you maintain a separate "free" tree.
>> It should not be necessary any more, but maybe you tried removing it
>> already and found a performance problem?
>>
> We maintain it in order to split several entities. That prevents
> interfering between allocated data and vmap-free-space manager.
> So in that case one context can easily access allocated data, for
> example vread iterator, etc., whereas another can do an allocation.
> 
> So by splitting parts i minimize lock-contention.
> 
> --
> Uladzislau Rezki

The lock contention concern makes sense, and in the next patch I will
incorporate the suggested changes.

1. find_vmap_area() will be converted to a fully lockless RCU walk.
   With MT_FLAGS_USE_RCU set on vn->busy.mt and call_rcu-deferred
   vmap_area free, callers such as vread_iter and vmalloc_info_show will
   traverse the occupied tree without taking vn->busy.lock.  This will
   eliminate the contention.

2. The global allocator lock will serialise only the gap find & range publish
   pair on the occupied tree. Per node busy lock will be a separate, finer grained
   lock will only need to be held for the busy tree insert after an address
   gets selected.

3. As Matthew noted in his follow up, the maple tree's own RCU safe node
   retirement will need readers holding only rcu_read_lock() giving a consistent
   view of the tree at every index. So the contention reduction goal will be
   met without a separate free index.

BR,
Pranjal



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-26 10:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-13 17:19 [PATCH RFC 00/12] mm/vmalloc: migrate vmap_area indexing from rb-tree to maple-tree Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] mm/vmalloc: introduce maple_tree-based indexing for vmap_area Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] mm/vmalloc: convert allocation-side gap finding and insertion to maple_tree Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] mm/vmalloc: convert free, purge, and pcpu paths " Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] mm/vmalloc: finalize maple-only indexing and shrink struct vmap_area Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] mm/vmalloc: tighten failure handling under memory pressure Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] mm/vmalloc: tighten alloc/free hot paths Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] mm/vmalloc: consolidate occupied tree as authoritative index on hot path Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] mm/vmalloc: track lazy-purge queue as a list_head Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] mm/vmalloc: collapse busy-tree find-then-unlink into a single mas_erase Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] mm/vmalloc: per-CPU caching of free ranges from the maple_tree allocator Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] mm/vmalloc: O(1) lookup of cached vmap_areas with bounded fast-reject Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 17:19 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] mm/vmalloc: harden bump-allocator alloc/free against UBSAN array bounds Pranjal Arya
2026-06-13 23:15 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] mm/vmalloc: migrate vmap_area indexing from rb-tree to maple-tree Matthew Wilcox
2026-06-15  9:52   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-06-16 18:07     ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-06-18 10:06       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-06-26 10:47         ` Pranjal Arya
2026-06-26 14:15           ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-06-26 10:34       ` Pranjal Arya
2026-06-26 10:18     ` Pranjal Arya [this message]
2026-06-25 21:20   ` Pranjal Arya
2026-06-25 21:28   ` Pranjal Arya
2026-06-26  9:43   ` Pranjal Arya
2026-06-14  6:35 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2026-06-14  6:58 ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] " Uladzislau Rezki
2026-06-26 11:00   ` Pranjal Arya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9eca8338-bfcc-4241-954f-2bf2fd14db1d@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=pranjal.arya@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=andrewjballance@gmail.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=maple-tree@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=wkarny@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox