linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] scripts: Include postprocessing script for memory allocation tracing
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:31:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A6E7231A-54FF-4D5C-90F5-0A8C4126CFEA@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANnt6X=RpSnuxGXZfF6Qa5mJpzC8gL3wkKJi3tQMZJBZJVWF3w@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 928 bytes --]


> On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org <mailto:mhocko@kernel.org>> wrote:
> 
> trace_mm_page_alloc will tell you details about the allocation, like
> gfp mask, order but it doesn't tell you how long the allocation took at
> its current form. So either you have to note jiffies at the allocation
> start and then add the end-start in the trace point or we really need
> another trace point to note the start. The later has an advantage that
> we do not add unnecessary load for jiffies when the tracepoint is
> disabled.

The function graph tracer can tell us how long alloc_pages_nodemask() took.
Can’t that, combined with the context information given by trace_mm_page_alloc
give us what we want? Correct me if I am wrong.

Regards,
Janani.

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
> 


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2169 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-17 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-11 22:24 [RFC] scripts: Include postprocessing script for memory allocation tracing Janani Ravichandran
2016-09-12 12:16 ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-13 18:04   ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-09-19  9:42     ` Michal Hocko
2016-09-22 15:30       ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-09-23  8:07         ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-06 12:00           ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-11 14:43           ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-10-15 23:31             ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-10-16  7:33               ` Michal Hocko
     [not found]                 ` <CANnt6X=RpSnuxGXZfF6Qa5mJpzC8gL3wkKJi3tQMZJBZJVWF3w@mail.gmail.com>
2016-10-17 17:31                   ` Janani Ravichandran [this message]
2016-10-18 13:13                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-20 23:10                       ` Janani Ravichandran
2016-10-21  7:08                         ` Michal Hocko
2016-10-27 15:42                           ` Janani Ravichandran
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-08-19 11:38 Janani Ravichandran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A6E7231A-54FF-4D5C-90F5-0A8C4126CFEA@gmail.com \
    --to=janani.rvchndrn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).