From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] truncate: Remove unnecessary page release
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:58:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=UfmZNfKWCisrs6ezzoWqpcwUOT5bs8LGwN7Rv@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101220112733.064f2fe3.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:27 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:21:52 +0900 (JST)
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> > This patch series changes remove_from_page_cache's page ref counting
>> > rule. page cache ref count is decreased in remove_from_page_cache.
>> > So we don't need call again in caller context.
>> >
>> > Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
>> > Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > mm/truncate.c | 1 -
>> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
>> > index 9ee5673..8decb93 100644
>> > --- a/mm/truncate.c
>> > +++ b/mm/truncate.c
>> > @@ -114,7 +114,6 @@ truncate_complete_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
>> > * calls cleancache_put_page (and note page->mapping is now NULL)
>> > */
>> > cleancache_flush_page(mapping, page);
>> > - page_cache_release(page); /* pagecache ref */
>> > return 0;
>>
>> Do we _always_ have stable page reference here? IOW, I can assume
>> cleancache_flush_page() doesn't cause NULL deref?
>>
> Hmm, my review was bad.
>
> I think cleancache_flush_page() here should eat (mapping, index) as argument
> rather than "page".
>
> BTW, I can't understand
> ==
> void __cleancache_flush_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
> {
> /* careful... page->mapping is NULL sometimes when this is called */
> int pool_id = mapping->host->i_sb->cleancache_poolid;
> struct cleancache_filekey key = { .u.key = { 0 } };
> ==
>
> Why above is safe...
> I think (mapping,index) should be passed instead of page.
I don't think current code isn't safe.
void __cleancache_flush_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
{
/* careful... page->mapping is NULL sometimes when this is called */
int pool_id = mapping->host->i_sb->cleancache_poolid;
struct cleancache_filekey key = { .u.key = { 0 } };
if (pool_id >= 0) {
VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
it does check PageLocked. So caller should hold a page reference to
prevent freeing ramined PG_locked
If the caller doesn't hold a ref of page, I think it's BUG of caller.
In our case, caller calls truncate_complete_page have to make sure it, I think.
>
>
> -Kame
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-20 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-17 17:13 [RFC 0/5] Change page reference hanlding semantic of page cache Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 17:13 ` [RFC 1/5] drop page reference on remove_from_page_cache Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 1:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-17 17:13 ` [RFC 2/5] fuse: Remove unnecessary page release Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 1:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-17 17:13 ` [RFC 3/5] tlbfs: " Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 1:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-01-06 9:56 ` Mel Gorman
2011-01-10 15:39 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-17 17:13 ` [RFC 4/5] swap: " Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 1:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-17 17:13 ` [RFC 5/5] truncate: " Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 1:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-20 2:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-20 2:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-20 2:58 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-12-20 4:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-20 8:09 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 8:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-12-20 2:27 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 2:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-20 2:49 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 3:03 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-20 3:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-20 10:33 ` [RFC 0/5] Change page reference hanlding semantic of page cache Christoph Hellwig
2010-12-20 23:36 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-21 5:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-12-21 7:32 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTi=UfmZNfKWCisrs6ezzoWqpcwUOT5bs8LGwN7Rv@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).