linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: cl@linux.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: move kmem_cache_node into it's own cacheline
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 07:59:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilfJh65QAkb9FPaqI3UEtbgwLuuoqSdaTtIsXWZ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100520234714.6633.75614.stgit@gitlad.jf.intel.com>

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> wrote:
> This patch is meant to improve the performance of SLUB by moving the local
> kmem_cache_node lock into it's own cacheline separate from kmem_cache.
> This is accomplished by simply removing the local_node when NUMA is enabled.
>
> On my system with 2 nodes I saw around a 5% performance increase w/
> hackbench times dropping from 6.2 seconds to 5.9 seconds on average.  I
> suspect the performance gain would increase as the number of nodes
> increases, but I do not have the data to currently back that up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>

Yanmin, does this fix the hackbench regression for you?

> ---
>
>  include/linux/slub_def.h |   11 ++++-------
>  mm/slub.c                |   33 +++++++++++----------------------
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> index 0249d41..e6217bb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
> +++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct kmem_cache_node {
>        atomic_long_t total_objects;
>        struct list_head full;
>  #endif
> -};
> +} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
>
>  /*
>  * Word size structure that can be atomically updated or read and that
> @@ -75,12 +75,6 @@ struct kmem_cache {
>        int offset;             /* Free pointer offset. */
>        struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo;
>
> -       /*
> -        * Avoid an extra cache line for UP, SMP and for the node local to
> -        * struct kmem_cache.
> -        */
> -       struct kmem_cache_node local_node;
> -
>        /* Allocation and freeing of slabs */
>        struct kmem_cache_order_objects max;
>        struct kmem_cache_order_objects min;
> @@ -102,6 +96,9 @@ struct kmem_cache {
>         */
>        int remote_node_defrag_ratio;
>        struct kmem_cache_node *node[MAX_NUMNODES];
> +#else
> +       /* Avoid an extra cache line for UP */
> +       struct kmem_cache_node local_node;
>  #endif
>  };
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 461314b..8af03de 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2141,7 +2141,7 @@ static void free_kmem_cache_nodes(struct kmem_cache *s)
>
>        for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
>                struct kmem_cache_node *n = s->node[node];
> -               if (n && n != &s->local_node)
> +               if (n)
>                        kmem_cache_free(kmalloc_caches, n);
>                s->node[node] = NULL;
>        }
> @@ -2150,33 +2150,22 @@ static void free_kmem_cache_nodes(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  static int init_kmem_cache_nodes(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags)
>  {
>        int node;
> -       int local_node;
> -
> -       if (slab_state >= UP && (s < kmalloc_caches ||
> -                       s >= kmalloc_caches + KMALLOC_CACHES))
> -               local_node = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(s));
> -       else
> -               local_node = 0;
>
>        for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
>                struct kmem_cache_node *n;
>
> -               if (local_node == node)
> -                       n = &s->local_node;
> -               else {
> -                       if (slab_state == DOWN) {
> -                               early_kmem_cache_node_alloc(gfpflags, node);
> -                               continue;
> -                       }
> -                       n = kmem_cache_alloc_node(kmalloc_caches,
> -                                                       gfpflags, node);
> -
> -                       if (!n) {
> -                               free_kmem_cache_nodes(s);
> -                               return 0;
> -                       }
> +               if (slab_state == DOWN) {
> +                       early_kmem_cache_node_alloc(gfpflags, node);
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +               n = kmem_cache_alloc_node(kmalloc_caches,
> +                                               gfpflags, node);
>
> +               if (!n) {
> +                       free_kmem_cache_nodes(s);
> +                       return 0;
>                }
> +
>                s->node[node] = n;
>                init_kmem_cache_node(n, s);
>        }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-21  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-20 23:47 [PATCH] slub: move kmem_cache_node into it's own cacheline Alexander Duyck
2010-05-21  4:59 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2010-05-21 14:41   ` Shi, Alex
2010-05-21 18:03     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-24 18:14     ` Pekka Enberg
2010-05-26  0:52       ` Shi, Alex
2010-05-21 18:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-21 18:17   ` Duyck, Alexander H
2010-05-21 18:24     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-21 18:33       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-21 20:23         ` Duyck, Alexander H
2010-05-21 20:41           ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTilfJh65QAkb9FPaqI3UEtbgwLuuoqSdaTtIsXWZ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).