From: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
"缪 勰" <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_attch()
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:46:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimRH=LVRLnajbtL3a8FwKkbEfLspAHXXeQLUY8=@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5C7EBF.2070603@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> oldcs->mems_allowed is not modified during cpuset_attch(), so
> we don't have to copy it to a buffer allocated by NODEMASK_ALLOC().
> Just pass it to cpuset_migrate_mm().
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
I'd be inclined to skip this one - we're already allocating one
nodemask, so one more isn't really any extra complexity, and we're
doing horrendously complicated stuff in cpuset_migrate_mm() that's
much more likely to fail in low-memory situations.
It's true that mems_allowed can't change during the call to
cpuset_attach(), but that's due to the fact that both cgroup_attach()
and the cpuset.mems write paths take cgroup_mutex. I might prefer to
leave the allocated nodemask here and wrap callback_mutex around the
places in cpuset_attach() where we're reading from a cpuset's
mems_allowed - that would remove the implicit synchronization via
cgroup_mutex and leave the code a little more understandable.
> ---
> kernel/cpuset.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index f13ff2e..70c9ca2 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -1438,10 +1438,9 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> struct cpuset *cs = cgroup_cs(cont);
> struct cpuset *oldcs = cgroup_cs(oldcont);
> - NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, from, GFP_KERNEL);
> NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, to, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> - if (from == NULL || to == NULL)
> + if (to == NULL)
> goto alloc_fail;
>
> if (cs == &top_cpuset) {
> @@ -1463,18 +1462,16 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont,
> }
>
> /* change mm; only needs to be done once even if threadgroup */
> - *from = oldcs->mems_allowed;
> *to = cs->mems_allowed;
> mm = get_task_mm(tsk);
> if (mm) {
> mpol_rebind_mm(mm, to);
> if (is_memory_migrate(cs))
> - cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, from, to);
> + cpuset_migrate_mm(mm, &oldcs->mems_allowed, to);
> mmput(mm);
> }
>
> alloc_fail:
> - NODEMASK_FREE(from);
> NODEMASK_FREE(to);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-17 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-17 1:49 [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 1:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_attch() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:46 ` Paul Menage [this message]
2011-02-18 2:37 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 1:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Fix unchecked calls to NODEMASK_ALLOC() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 22:46 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-17 23:50 ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18 2:47 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-19 2:28 ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-21 3:20 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-21 5:30 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22 0:25 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-22 2:15 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 1:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuset: Hold callback_mutex in cpuset_clone() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:51 ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 23:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Paul Menage
2011-02-18 2:22 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTimRH=LVRLnajbtL3a8FwKkbEfLspAHXXeQLUY8=@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).