From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
"M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@superonline.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:47:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimzby23QO4w0o1vSHnin9AakoG+cp9zd6a8T6FA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201009121942.53543.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:42 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Sunday, September 12, 2010, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Adnrew, Please drop my old version and merge this verstion.
>> (old : vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path.patch)
>>
>> * Changelog from v2
>> * remove inline - suggested by Andrew
>> * add function desription - suggeseted by Adnrew
>>
>> == CUT HERE ==
>
> For the record, this commit:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6715045ddc7472a22be5e49d4047d2d89b391f45
>
> is reported to fix the problem without the $subject patch (see
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/11/129). So, I'm not sure if it's still necessary
> to special case this particular situation?
I didn't follow your patch.
If your patch can fix the problem, We don't need new overhead direct
reclaim without big benefit. So I don't care of dropping this patch.
We need agreement of another author KOSAKI.
Thanks for the information, Rafael. :)
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-13 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-12 16:32 [PATCH v2] vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path Minchan Kim
2010-09-12 17:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-09-13 0:47 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTimzby23QO4w0o1vSHnin9AakoG+cp9zd6a8T6FA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bicave@superonline.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).