From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B128D0040 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:45:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by wwi36 with SMTP id 36so641496wwi.26 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 06:45:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20110324182240.5fe56de2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110324105222.GA2625@barrios-desktop> <20110325090411.56c5e5b2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110325115453.82a9736d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:45:15 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] forkbomb killer From: Colin Walters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "rientjes@google.com" , Andrey Vagin , KOSAKI Motohiro , Hugh Dickins , Johannes Weiner , Rik van Riel Is there anything here that couldn't be solved with a proper cgroups configuration? In fact, wasn't this type of problem the original cgroups motivation? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org