From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Yakui Zhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:06:56 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinxTojeckJpfLh9eMM4odK61-VzE2A0G9E3nRuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100713154025.7c60c76b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:40 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:04:00 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> > 2. This can't be help for a case where a section has multiple small holes.
>> >>
>> >> I agree. But this(not punched hole but not filled section problem)
>> >> isn't such case. But it would be better to handle it altogether. :)
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Then, my proposal for HOLES_IN_MEMMAP sparsemem is below.
>> >> > ==
>> >> > Some architectures unmap memmap[] for memory holes even with SPARSEMEM.
>> >> > To handle that, pfn_valid() should check there are really memmap or not.
>> >> > For that purpose, __get_user() can be used.
>> >>
>> >> Look at free_unused_memmap. We don't unmap pte of hole memmap.
>> >> Is __get_use effective, still?
>> >>
>> > __get_user() works with TLB and page table, the vaddr is really mapped or not.
>> > If you got SEGV, __get_user() returns -EFAULT. It works per page granule.
>>
>> I mean following as.
>> For example, there is a struct page in on 0x20000000.
>>
>> int pfn_valid_mapped(unsigned long pfn)
>> {
>> struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); /* hole page is 0x2000000 */
>> char *lastbyte = (char *)(page+1)-1; /* lastbyte is 0x2000001f */
>> char byte;
>>
>> /* We pass this test since free_unused_memmap doesn't unmap pte */
>> if(__get_user(byte, page) != 0)
>> return 0;
>
> why ? When the page size is 4096 byte.
>
> 0x1ffff000 - 0x1ffffffff
> 0x20000000 - 0x200000fff are on the same page. And memory is mapped per page.
sizeof(struct page) is 32 byte.
So lastbyte is address of struct page + 32 byte - 1.
> What we access by above __get_user() is a byte at [0x20000000, 0x20000001)
Right.
> and it's unmapped if 0x20000000 is unmapped.
free_unused_memmap doesn't unmap pte although it returns the page to
free list of buddy.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-13 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-12 15:53 [RFC] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem Minchan Kim
2010-07-12 23:59 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-13 3:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 4:11 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 6:04 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 6:40 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 8:06 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2010-07-13 8:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 7:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 7:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 7:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 8:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 18:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 20:46 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-13 9:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-07-13 15:43 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-13 16:35 ` Dave Hansen
2010-07-13 16:44 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-14 0:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14 6:44 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-14 7:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14 7:35 ` Minchan Kim
2010-07-14 7:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-14 7:50 ` Kukjin Kim
2010-07-14 8:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-07-13 9:37 ` Mel Gorman
2010-07-13 9:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-13 10:00 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTinxTojeckJpfLh9eMM4odK61-VzE2A0G9E3nRuQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).