linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Per Forlin <per.forlin@linaro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: mmc blkqueue is empty even if there are pending reads in do_generic_file_read()
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 20:54:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=74Mp1vWBt2F-sqqqkeNfP69+9vg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201105031516.28907.arnd@arndb.de>

On 3 May 2011 15:16, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 April 2011, Per Forlin wrote:
>
>> For reads on the other hand it look like this
>> root@(none):/ dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/null bs=4k count=256
>> 256+0 records in
>> 256+0 records out
>> root@(none):/ dmesg
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req d954cec0 blocks 32
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req d954cec0 blocks 64
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req d954cde8 blocks 128
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req d954cec0 blocks 256
>> [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>
>> There are never more than one read request in the mmc block queue. All
>> the mmc request preparations will be serialized and the cost for this
>> is roughly 10% lower bandwidth (verified on ARM platforms ux500 and
>> Pandaboard).
>
> After some offline discussions, I went back to look at your mail, and I think
> the explanation is much simpler than you expected:
>
> You have only a single process reading blocks synchronously, so the round
> trip goes all the way to user space. The block layer does some readahead,
> so it will start reading 32 blocks instead of just 8 (4KB) for the first
> read, but then the user process just sits waiting for data. After the
> mmc driver has finished reading the entire 32 blocks, the user needs a
> little time to read them from the page cache in 4 KB chunks (8 syscalls),
> during which the block layer has no clue about what the user wants to do
> next.
>
> The readahead scales up to 256 blocks, but there is still only one reader,
> so you never have additional requests in the queue.
>
> Try running multiple readers in parallel, e.g.
>
> for i in 1 2 3 4 5 ; do
>        dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 bs=16k count=256 iflag=direct skip=$[$i * 1024] &
> done
Yes you are right about this. If I run with multiple read threads
there are multiple request waiting in the mmc block queue.

>> page_not_up_to_date:
>> /* Get exclusive access to the page ... */
>> error = lock_page_killable(page);
> I looked at the code in do_generic_file_read(). lock_page_killable
> waits until the current read ahead is completed.
> Is it possible to configure the read ahead to push multiple read
> request to the block device queue?add
When I first looked at this I used dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=4
If bs is larger than read ahead, this will make the execution loop in
do_generic_file_read() reading 512 until 1M is read. The second time
in this loop it will wait on lock_page_killable.

If bs=16k the execution wont stuck at lock_page_killable.


>
>
>        Arnd
>
Thanks,
Per

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-03 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-28 18:39 mmc blkqueue is empty even if there are pending reads in do_generic_file_read() Per Forlin
2011-05-03 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-03 18:54   ` Per Forlin [this message]
2011-05-03 20:02     ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-03 20:11       ` Per Forlin
2011-05-04 13:01         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-04 19:13       ` Per Forlin
2011-05-07 10:45         ` Per Forlin
2011-05-08 15:09           ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-05-08 16:23             ` Per Forlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTi=74Mp1vWBt2F-sqqqkeNfP69+9vg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=per.forlin@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).