Re: [PATCH 3/7] memcg: add memory.scan_stat

[Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>]

On Sunday, June 19, 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:41:23 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:04:18 -0700
>> Ying Han <yinghan@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:53 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
>> > <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > > From e08990dd9ada13cf236bec1ef44b207436434b8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> > > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:11:01 +0900
>> > > Subject: [PATCH 3/7] memcg: add memory.scan_stat
>> > >
>> > > commit log of commit 0ae5e89 " memcg: count the soft_limit reclaim in..."
>> > > says it adds scanning stats to memory.stat file. But it doesn't because
>> > > we considered we needed to make a concensus for such new APIs.
>> > >
>> > > This patch is a trial to add memory.scan_stat. This shows
>> > >  - the number of scanned pages
>> > >  - the number of recleimed pages
>> > >  - the number of elaplsed time (including sleep/pause time)
>> > >  for both of direct/soft reclaim and shrinking caused by changing limit
>> > >  or force_empty.
>> > >
>> > > The biggest difference with oringinal Ying's one is that this file
>> > > can be reset by some write, as
>> > >
>> > >  # echo 0 ...../memory.scan_stat
>> > >
>> > > [kamezawa@bluextal ~]$ cat /cgroup/memory/A/memory.scan_stat
>> > > scanned_pages_by_limit 358470
>> > > freed_pages_by_limit 180795
>> > > elapsed_ns_by_limit 21629927
>> > > scanned_pages_by_system 0
>> > > freed_pages_by_system 0
>> > > elapsed_ns_by_system 0
>> > > scanned_pages_by_shrink 76646
>> > > freed_pages_by_shrink 38355
>> > > elappsed_ns_by_shrink 31990670
>> > > total_scanned_pages_by_limit 358470
>> > > total_freed_pages_by_limit 180795
>> > > total_elapsed_ns_by_hierarchical 216299275
>> > > total_scanned_pages_by_system 0
>> > > total_freed_pages_by_system 0
>> > > total_elapsed_ns_by_system 0
>> > > total_scanned_pages_by_shrink 76646
>> > > total_freed_pages_by_shrink 38355
>> > > total_elapsed_ns_by_shrink 31990670
>> > >
>> > > total_xxxx is for hierarchy management.
>> > >
>> > > This will be useful for further memcg developments and need to be
>> > > developped before we do some complicated rework on LRU/softlimit
>> > > management.
>> >
>> > Agreed. Actually we are also looking into adding a per-memcg API for
>> > adding visibility of
>> > page reclaim path. It would be helpful for us to settle w/ the API first.
>> >
>> > I am not a fan of names, but how about
>> > "/dev/cgroup/memory/memory.reclaim_stat" ?
>> >
>>
>> Hm, ok, I have no favorite.
>>
>>
>
> If I rename, I'll just rename file name as "reclaim_stat" but doesn't
> rename internal structures because there is already "struct reclaim_stat".
>
> Hm, to be honest, I don't like the name "reclaim_stat".
> (Because in most case, the pages are not freed for reclaim, but for
>  hitting limit.)
>
> memory.vmscan_info ?

No objection on the name. I will look into the other part of the patch

Thanks

--ying
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>