From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Robert Święcki" <robert@swiecki.net>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix possible cause of a page_mapped BUG
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 18:18:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTik-s3Gr6GDMN4L24wX2BK9n3okzQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim_QtaQLa9GV5hMZyCmW_WAz_Ucvg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> A more conservative alternative could
>> be to enable the guard page special case under an new GUP flag, but
>> this loses much of the elegance of your original proposal...
>
> How about only doing that only for FOLL_MLOCK?
Sounds reasonable.
> Also, looking at mm/mlock.c, why _do_ we call get_user_pages() even if
> the vma isn't mlocked? That looks bogus. Since we have dropped the
> mm_semaphore, an unlock may have happened, and afaik we should *not*
> try to bring those pages back in at all. There's this whole comment
> about that in the caller ("__mlock_vma_pages_range() double checks the
> vma flags, so that it won't mlock pages if the vma was already
> munlocked."), but despite that it would actually call
> __get_user_pages() even if the VM_LOCKED bit had been cleared (it just
> wouldn't call it with the FOLL_MLOCK flag).
There are two reasons VM_LOCKED might be cleared in
__mlock_vma_pages_range(). It could be that one of the VM_SPECIAL
flags were set on the VMA, in which case mlock() won't set VM_LOCKED
but it still must make the pages present. Or, there is an munlock()
executing concurrently with mlock() - in that case, the conservative
thing to do is to give the same results as if the mlock() had
completed before the munlock(). That is, the mlock() would have broken
COW / made the pages present and the munlock() would have cleared the
VM_LOCKED and PageMlocked flags.
> UNTESTED! And maybe there was some really subtle reason to still call
> __get_user_pages() without that FOLL_MLOCK thing that I'm missing.
I think we want the mm/memory.c part of this proposal without the
mm/mlock.c part.
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-05 1:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 5:39 [PATCH] mm: fix possible cause of a page_mapped BUG Hugh Dickins
2011-02-28 23:35 ` Robert Święcki
2011-03-17 15:40 ` Robert Święcki
2011-03-19 5:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-01 14:34 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-01 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-01 16:21 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-01 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-02 4:01 ` Hui Zhu
2011-04-04 13:02 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-02 1:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-04 12:46 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-04 18:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-05 12:21 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-05 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-06 14:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-06 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-06 15:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-06 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-06 17:54 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-07 12:41 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-07 14:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-12 9:58 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-12 14:21 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <BANLkTik6U21r91DYiUsz9A0P--=5QcsBrA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-12 16:17 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-12 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-12 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-12 19:02 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-12 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 21:15 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-05-05 0:09 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-05-05 0:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-05 1:18 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2011-05-05 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-05 3:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-05 4:26 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-04-07 14:17 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTik-s3Gr6GDMN4L24wX2BK9n3okzQA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=walken@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=robert@swiecki.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).