From: "Robert Święcki" <robert@swiecki.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix possible cause of a page_mapped BUG
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:41:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim-hyXpLj537asC__8exMo3o-WCLA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim0MZfa8vFgHB3W6NsoPHp2jfirrA@mail.gmail.com>
>>> I was about to send you my own UNTESTED patch: let me append it anyway,
>>> I think it is more correct than yours (it's the offset of vm_end we need
>>> to worry about, and there's the funny old_len,new_len stuff).
>>
>> Umm. That's what my patch did too. The
>>
>> pgoff = (addr - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>
>> is the "offset of the pgoff" from the original mapping, then we do
>>
>> pgoff += vma->vm_pgoff;
>>
>> to get the pgoff of the new mapping, and then we do
>>
>> if (pgoff + (new_len >> PAGE_SHIFT) < pgoff)
>>
>> to check that the new mapping is ok.
>>
>> I think yours is equivalent, just a different (and odd - that
>> linear_page_index() thing will do lots of unnecessary shifts and
>> hugepage crap) way of writing it.
>>
>>> See what you think - sorry, I'm going out now.
>>
>> I think _yours_ is conceptually buggy, because I think that test for
>> "vma->vm_file" is wrong.
>>
>> Yes, new anonymous mappings set vm_pgoff to the virtual address, but
>> that's not true for mremap() moving them around, afaik.
>>
>> Admittedly it's really hard to get to the overflow case, because the
>> address is shifted down, so even if you start out with an anonymous
>> mmap at a high address (to get a big vm_off), and then move it down
>> and expand it (to get a big size), I doubt you can possibly overflow.
>> But I still don't think that the test for vm_file is semantically
>> sensible, even if it might not _matter_.
>>
>> But whatever. I suspect both our patches are practically doing the
>> same thing, and it would be interesting to hear if it actually fixes
>> the issue. Maybe there is some other way to mess up vm_pgoff that I
>> can't think of right now.
>
> Testing with Linus' patch. Will let you know in a few hours.
Ok, nothing happened after ~20h. The bug, usually, was triggered within 5-10h.
I can add some printk in this condition, and let it run for a few days
(I will not have access to my testing machine throughout that time),
if you think this will confirm your hypothesis.
--
Robert Święcki
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-07 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-24 5:39 [PATCH] mm: fix possible cause of a page_mapped BUG Hugh Dickins
2011-02-28 23:35 ` Robert Święcki
2011-03-17 15:40 ` Robert Święcki
2011-03-19 5:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-01 14:34 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-01 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-01 16:21 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-01 16:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-02 4:01 ` Hui Zhu
2011-04-04 13:02 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-02 1:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-04 12:46 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-04 18:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-05 12:21 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-05 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-06 14:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-06 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-06 15:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-06 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-06 17:54 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-07 12:41 ` Robert Święcki [this message]
2011-04-07 14:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-04-12 9:58 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-12 14:21 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <BANLkTik6U21r91DYiUsz9A0P--=5QcsBrA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-04-12 16:17 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-12 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-12 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-12 19:02 ` Robert Święcki
2011-04-12 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-04-18 21:15 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-05-05 0:09 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-05-05 0:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-05 1:18 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-05-05 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-05 3:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-05 4:26 ` Michel Lespinasse
2011-04-07 14:17 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTim-hyXpLj537asC__8exMo3o-WCLA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=robert@swiecki.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).