linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 10/10] memcg : reclaim statistics
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:13:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimL6cx2yfQ4azKMYq8WiTOttqyhzQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110526143631.adc2c911.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 11017 bytes --]

Hi Kame:

I applied the patch on top of mmotm-2011-05-12-15-52. After boot up, i keep
getting the following crash by reading the
/dev/cgroup/memory/memory.reclaim_stat

[  200.776366] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
[  200.781591] Pid: 7535, comm: cat Tainted: G      D W   2.6.39-mcg-DEV
#130
[  200.788463] Call Trace:
[  200.790916]  [<ffffffff81405a75>] panic+0x91/0x194
[  200.797096]  [<ffffffff81408ac8>] oops_end+0xae/0xbe
[  200.803450]  [<ffffffff810398d3>] die+0x5a/0x63
[  200.809366]  [<ffffffff81408561>] do_trap+0x121/0x130
[  200.814427]  [<ffffffff81037fe6>] do_divide_error+0x90/0x99
[#1] SMP
[  200.821395]  [<ffffffff81112bcb>] ?
mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read+0x28/0xf0
[  200.829624]  [<ffffffff81104509>] ? page_add_new_anon_rmap+0x7e/0x90
[  200.837372]  [<ffffffff810fb7f8>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x28a/0x775
[  200.844773]  [<ffffffff8140f0f5>] divide_error+0x15/0x20
[  200.851471]  [<ffffffff81112bcb>] ?
mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read+0x28/0xf0
[  200.859729]  [<ffffffff810a4a01>] cgroup_seqfile_show+0x38/0x46
[  200.867036]  [<ffffffff810a4d72>] ? cgroup_lock+0x17/0x17
[  200.872444]  [<ffffffff81133f2c>] seq_read+0x182/0x361
[  200.878984]  [<ffffffff8111a0c4>] vfs_read+0xab/0x107
[  200.885403]  [<ffffffff8111a1e0>] sys_read+0x4a/0x6e
[  200.891764]  [<ffffffff8140f469>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x27

I will debug it, but like to post here in case i missed some patches in
between.

--Ying

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:36 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

>
> This patch adds a file memory.reclaim_stat.
>
> This file shows following.
> ==
> recent_scan_success_ratio  12 # recent reclaim/scan ratio.
> limit_scan_pages 671          # scan caused by hitting limit.
> limit_freed_pages 538         # freed pages by limit_scan
> limit_elapsed_ns 518555076    # elapsed time in LRU scanning by limit.
> soft_scan_pages 0             # scan caused by softlimit.
> soft_freed_pages 0            # freed pages by soft_scan.
> soft_elapsed_ns 0             # elapsed time in LRU scanning by softlimit.
> margin_scan_pages 16744221    # scan caused by auto-keep-margin
> margin_freed_pages 565943     # freed pages by auto-keep-margin.
> margin_elapsed_ns 5545388791  # elapsed time in LRU scanning by
> auto-keep-margin
>
> This patch adds a new file rather than adding more stats to memory.stat. By
> it,
> this support "reset" accounting by
>
>  # echo 0 > .../memory.reclaim_stat
>
> This is good for debug and tuning.
>
> TODO:
>  - add Documentaion.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |   87
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: memcg_async/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- memcg_async.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ memcg_async/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -216,6 +216,13 @@ static void mem_cgroup_update_margin_to_
>  static void mem_cgroup_may_async_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
>  static void mem_cgroup_reflesh_scan_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem);
>
> +enum scan_type {
> +       LIMIT_SCAN,     /* scan memory because memcg hits limit */
> +       SOFT_SCAN,      /* scan memory because of soft limit */
> +       MARGIN_SCAN,    /* scan memory for making margin to limit */
> +       NR_SCAN_TYPES,
> +};
> +
>  /*
>  * The memory controller data structure. The memory controller controls
> both
>  * page cache and RSS per cgroup. We would eventually like to provide
> @@ -300,6 +307,13 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>        unsigned long   scanned;
>        unsigned long   reclaimed;
>        unsigned long   next_scanratio_update;
> +       /* For statistics */
> +       struct {
> +               unsigned long nr_scanned_pages;
> +               unsigned long nr_reclaimed_pages;
> +               unsigned long elapsed_ns;
> +       } scan_stat[NR_SCAN_TYPES];
> +
>        /*
>         * percpu counter.
>         */
> @@ -1426,7 +1440,9 @@ unsigned int mem_cgroup_swappiness(struc
>
>  static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>                                unsigned long scanned,
> -                               unsigned long reclaimed)
> +                               unsigned long reclaimed,
> +                               unsigned long elapsed,
> +                               enum scan_type type)
>  {
>        unsigned long limit;
>
> @@ -1439,6 +1455,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_rat
>                mem->scanned /= 2;
>                mem->reclaimed /= 2;
>        }
> +       mem->scan_stat[type].nr_scanned_pages += scanned;
> +       mem->scan_stat[type].nr_reclaimed_pages += reclaimed;
> +       mem->scan_stat[type].elapsed_ns += elapsed;
>        spin_unlock(&mem->scan_stat_lock);
>  }
>
> @@ -1448,6 +1467,8 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_rat
>  * @root : root memcg of hierarchy walk.
>  * @scanned : scanned pages
>  * @reclaimed: reclaimed pages.
> + * @elapsed: used time for memory reclaim
> + * @type : scan type as LIMIT_SCAN, SOFT_SCAN, MARGIN_SCAN.
>  *
>  * record scan/reclaim ratio to the memcg both to a child and it's root
>  * mem cgroup, which is a reclaim target. This value is used for
> @@ -1457,11 +1478,14 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_update_scan_rat
>  static void mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(struct mem_cgroup *mem,
>                                  struct mem_cgroup *root,
>                                unsigned long scanned,
> -                               unsigned long reclaimed)
> +                               unsigned long reclaimed,
> +                               unsigned long elapsed,
> +                               int type)
>  {
> -       __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(mem, scanned, reclaimed);
> +       __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(mem, scanned, reclaimed, elapsed,
> type);
>        if (mem != root)
> -               __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(root, scanned, reclaimed);
> +               __mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(root, scanned, reclaimed,
> +                                       elapsed, type);
>
>  }
>
> @@ -1906,6 +1930,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
>        bool is_kswapd = false;
>        unsigned long excess;
>        unsigned long nr_scanned;
> +       unsigned long start, end, elapsed;
>
>        excess = res_counter_soft_limit_excess(&root_mem->res) >>
> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> @@ -1947,18 +1972,24 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_recla
>                }
>                /* we use swappiness of local cgroup */
>                if (check_soft) {
> +                       start = sched_clock();
>                        ret = mem_cgroup_shrink_node_zone(victim, gfp_mask,
>                                noswap, zone, &nr_scanned);
> +                       end = sched_clock();
> +                       elapsed = end - start;
>                        *total_scanned += nr_scanned;
>                        mem_cgroup_soft_steal(victim, is_kswapd, ret);
>                        mem_cgroup_soft_scan(victim, is_kswapd, nr_scanned);
>                        mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim,
> -                                       root_mem, nr_scanned, ret);
> +                               root_mem, nr_scanned, ret, elapsed,
> SOFT_SCAN);
>                } else {
> +                       start = sched_clock();
>                        ret = try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(victim, gfp_mask,
>                                        noswap, &nr_scanned);
> +                       end = sched_clock();
> +                       elapsed = end - start;
>                        mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim,
> -                                       root_mem, nr_scanned, ret);
> +                               root_mem, nr_scanned, ret, elapsed,
> LIMIT_SCAN);
>                }
>                css_put(&victim->css);
>                /*
> @@ -4003,7 +4034,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_async_shrink_work
>        struct delayed_work *dw = to_delayed_work(work);
>        struct mem_cgroup *mem, *victim;
>        long nr_to_reclaim;
> -       unsigned long nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed;
> +       unsigned long nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed, start, end;
>        int delay = 0;
>
>        mem = container_of(dw, struct mem_cgroup, async_work);
> @@ -4022,9 +4053,12 @@ static void mem_cgroup_async_shrink_work
>        if (!victim)
>                goto finish_scan;
>
> +       start = sched_clock();
>        nr_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_shrink_rate_limited(victim, nr_to_reclaim,
>                                        &nr_scanned);
> -       mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim, mem, nr_scanned,
> nr_reclaimed);
> +       end = sched_clock();
> +       mem_cgroup_update_scan_ratio(victim, mem, nr_scanned, nr_reclaimed,
> +                       end - start, MARGIN_SCAN);
>        css_put(&victim->css);
>
>        /* If margin is enough big, stop */
> @@ -4680,6 +4714,38 @@ static int mem_control_stat_show(struct
>        return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read(struct cgroup *cont, struct cftype
> *cft,
> +                                struct cgroup_map_cb *cb)
> +{
> +       struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont);
> +       u64 val;
> +       int i; /* for indexing scan_stat[] */
> +
> +       val = mem->reclaimed * 100 / mem->scanned;
> +       cb->fill(cb, "recent_scan_success_ratio", val);
> +       i  = LIMIT_SCAN;
> +       cb->fill(cb, "limit_scan_pages",
> mem->scan_stat[i].nr_scanned_pages);
> +       cb->fill(cb, "limit_freed_pages",
> mem->scan_stat[i].nr_reclaimed_pages);
> +       cb->fill(cb, "limit_elapsed_ns", mem->scan_stat[i].elapsed_ns);
> +       i = SOFT_SCAN;
> +       cb->fill(cb, "soft_scan_pages",
> mem->scan_stat[i].nr_scanned_pages);
> +       cb->fill(cb, "soft_freed_pages",
> mem->scan_stat[i].nr_reclaimed_pages);
> +       cb->fill(cb, "soft_elapsed_ns", mem->scan_stat[i].elapsed_ns);
> +       i = MARGIN_SCAN;
> +       cb->fill(cb, "margin_scan_pages",
> mem->scan_stat[i].nr_scanned_pages);
> +       cb->fill(cb, "margin_freed_pages",
> mem->scan_stat[i].nr_reclaimed_pages);
> +       cb->fill(cb, "margin_elapsed_ns", mem->scan_stat[i].elapsed_ns);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_reset(struct cgroup *cgrp, unsigned int
> event)
> +{
> +       struct mem_cgroup *mem = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> +       memset(mem->scan_stat, 0, sizeof(mem->scan_stat));
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
>  /*
>  * User flags for async_control is a subset of mem->async_flags. But
>  * this needs to be defined independently to hide implemation details.
> @@ -5163,6 +5229,11 @@ static struct cftype mem_cgroup_files[]
>                .open = mem_control_numa_stat_open,
>        },
>  #endif
> +       {
> +               .name = "reclaim_stat",
> +               .read_map = mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_read,
> +               .trigger = mem_cgroup_reclaim_stat_reset,
> +       }
>  };
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12695 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-27  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-26  5:10 [RFC][PATCH v3 0/10] memcg async reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:15 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 1/10] check reclaimable in hierarchy walk KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  5:47   ` Ying Han
2011-05-26  5:18 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 2/10] memcg: fix cached charge drain ratio KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:19 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 3/10] memcg: a test whether zone is reclaimable or not KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  7:21   ` Ying Han
2011-05-27  8:25     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:20 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 4/10] memcg: export swappiness KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:23 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 5/10] memcg keep margin to limit in background KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:24 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 6/10] memcg : auto keep margin in background , workqueue core KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:30 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 7/10] workqueue: add WQ_IDLEPRI KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  9:38   ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-26 10:30     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 10:50       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26 11:44         ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-26 23:41           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27 20:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26  5:32 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 8/10] memcg: scan ratio calculation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:35 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 9/10] memcg: scan limited memory reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-26  5:36 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 10/10] memcg : reclaim statistics KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  1:13   ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-05-27  1:17   ` Ying Han
2011-05-27  1:12     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  1:14     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  1:22       ` Ying Han
2011-05-27  1:49 ` [RFC][PATCH v3 0/10] memcg async reclaim Ying Han
2011-05-27  2:16   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  4:33     ` Ying Han
2011-05-27  4:34       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  4:49         ` Ying Han
2011-05-27  7:20           ` Ying Han
2011-05-31 17:04             ` Ying Han
2011-05-27  2:48   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  3:05     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-27  4:34       ` Ying Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BANLkTimL6cx2yfQ4azKMYq8WiTOttqyhzQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).