From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@kpanic.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org, mingo@elte.hu,
hpa@zytor.com, rick@vanrein.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@google.com>, Michael Ditto <mditto@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:06:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimPMnuoBRT9897hc-qBttyRZn46+A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110622110034.89ee399c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:>
> I have a couple of thoughts here:
>
> - If this patchset is merged and a major user such as google is
> unable to use it and has to continue to carry a separate patch then
> that's a regrettable situation for the upstream kernel.
>
> - Google's is, afaik, the largest use case we know of: zillions of
> machines for a number of years. And this real-world experience tells
> us that the badram patchset has shortcomings. Shortcomings which we
> can expect other users to experience.
>
> So. What are your thoughts on these issues?
Has Google submitted patches for their implementation?
josh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 11:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Add string parsing function get_next_ulong Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Add documentation and credits for BadRAM Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 18:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 18:06 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2011-06-22 18:09 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-06-22 18:11 ` Nancy Yuen
2011-06-22 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 19:01 ` Nancy Yuen
2011-06-22 19:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 18:24 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 18:38 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 18:56 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 19:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 19:15 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 20:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 20:28 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-22 19:46 ` [PATCH] x86: e820: Eliminate bubble sort from sanitize_e820_map Mike Ditto
2011-06-22 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) Stefan Assmann
2011-06-23 10:33 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-23 10:49 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-23 10:10 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-22 18:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-22 20:30 ` Stefan Assmann
2011-06-22 20:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-23 13:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-23 14:08 ` Stefan Assmann
2011-06-23 14:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-06-23 15:37 ` Stefan Assmann
2011-06-23 16:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-24 0:59 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-23 17:00 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-23 17:12 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-24 1:03 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-24 1:08 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-24 1:22 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-24 8:05 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-24 14:34 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-24 16:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-06-24 16:40 ` Luck, Tony
2011-06-24 16:56 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-24 17:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] <fa.fHPNPTsllvyE/7DxrKwiwgVbVww@ifi.uio.no>
2011-06-24 21:10 ` Shane Nay
2011-06-28 2:33 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-29 8:08 ` Rick van Rein
2011-06-29 15:28 ` craig lkml
2011-06-29 16:06 ` Craig Bergstrom
2011-06-29 21:24 ` Tony Luck
2011-06-30 14:32 ` Jody Belka
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-21 9:23 Stefan Assmann
2011-06-21 22:02 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 11:11 ` Stefan Assmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimPMnuoBRT9897hc-qBttyRZn46+A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mditto@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rick@vanrein.org \
--cc=sassmann@kpanic.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=yuenn@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).