linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 14:39:03 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimmn_PyU0xtfnG-CKxDxd1CTKx=Aw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikRFjGtBhnTBH_n=rDe+Y6kCjt30g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 05:04:41PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 15:04 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> > Confirmed, I'm afraid ... I can trigger the problem with all three
>>> > patches under PREEMPT.  It's not a hang this time, it's just kswapd
>>> > taking 100% system time on 1 CPU and it won't calm down after I unload
>>> > the system.
>>>
>>> Just on a "if you don't know what's wrong poke about and see" basis, I
>>> sliced out all the complex logic in sleeping_prematurely() and, as far
>>> as I can tell, it cures the problem behaviour.  I've loaded up the
>>> system, and taken the tar load generator through three runs without
>>> producing a spinning kswapd (this is PREEMPT).  I'll try with a
>>> non-PREEMPT kernel shortly.
>>>
>>> What this seems to say is that there's a problem with the complex logic
>>> in sleeping_prematurely().  I'm pretty sure hacking up
>>> sleeping_prematurely() just to dump all the calculations is the wrong
>>> thing to do, but perhaps someone can see what the right thing is ...
>>
>> I think I see the problem: the boolean logic of sleeping_prematurely()
>> is odd.  If it returns true, kswapd will keep running.  So if
>> pgdat_balanced() returns true, kswapd should go to sleep.
>>
>> This?
>
> Yes. Good catch.

In addition, I see some strange thing.
The comment in pgdat_balanced says
"Only zones that meet watermarks and are in a zone allowed by the
callers classzone_idx are added to balanced_pages"

It's true in case of balance_pgdat but it's not true in sleeping_prematurely.
This?

barrios@barrios-desktop:~/linux-mmotm$ git diff mm/vmscan.c
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 292582c..d9078cf 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2322,7 +2322,8 @@ static bool sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t
*pgdat, int order, long remaining,
                                                        classzone_idx, 0))
                        all_zones_ok = false;
                else
-                       balanced += zone->present_pages;
+                       if (i <= classzone_idx)
+                               balanced += zone->present_pages;
        }

        /*
@@ -2331,7 +2332,7 @@ static bool sleeping_prematurely(pg_data_t
*pgdat, int order, long remaining,
         * must be balanced
         */
        if (order)
-               return pgdat_balanced(pgdat, balanced, classzone_idx);
+               return !pgdat_balanced(pgdat, balanced, classzone_idx);
        else
                return !all_zones_ok;
 }





-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-13  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-11 15:29 [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: slub: Do not wake kswapd for SLUBs speculative " Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: slub: Do not take expensive steps " Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 21:10     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:25       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0 Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 20:38   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 20:53     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-11 21:09     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-11 22:27       ` David Rientjes
2011-05-13 10:14         ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:36     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-16 21:03       ` David Rientjes
2011-05-17  9:48         ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-17 19:25           ` David Rientjes
2011-05-12 14:43   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 15:15     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:27       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 15:43         ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:46           ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 16:00             ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:08               ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 16:27               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:30                 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 16:48                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 17:46                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:00                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:18                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 17:06                   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:11                     ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 17:38                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:00                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-13  9:49                           ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-15 16:39                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-16  8:42                               ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 17:51                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:03                         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:09                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 18:16                             ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 18:36                       ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 17:40                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-12 15:55           ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 18:37             ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 18:46               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 19:21                 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 19:44               ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:04                 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 20:29                   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:31                     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 20:31                     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 22:04                   ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 22:15                     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 22:58                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-05-13  5:39                         ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2011-05-13  0:47                       ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13  4:12                         ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 10:55                         ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13 14:16                           ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 10:30                       ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-13  6:16                   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-13 10:05                     ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 16:01           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-05-12 16:10             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-12 17:37               ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-12 15:45         ` Dave Jones
2011-05-11 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] Reduce impact to overall system of SLUB using high-order allocations James Bottomley
2011-05-11 22:28   ` David Rientjes
2011-05-11 22:34     ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 11:13       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 13:19         ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 14:04         ` James Bottomley
2011-05-12 15:53           ` James Bottomley
2011-05-13 11:25             ` Mel Gorman
2011-05-12 18:04       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-05-13 11:24         ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTimmn_PyU0xtfnG-CKxDxd1CTKx=Aw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).