linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Lsf] [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:53:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimv2HWwGf=RicANRv8ouDbqazAysQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110329204550.GN12265@random.random>

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 01:35:24PM -0700, Ying Han wrote:
>> In page reclaim, I would like to discuss on the magic "8" *
>> high_wmark() in balance_pgdat(). I recently found the discussion on
>> thread "too big min_free_kbytes", where I didn't find where we proved
>> it is still a problem or not. This might not need reserve time slot,
>> but something I want to learn more on.
>
> That is merged in 2.6.39-rc1. It's hopefully working good enough. We
> still use high+balance_gap but the balance_gap isn't high*8 anymore. I
> still think the balance_gap may as well be zero but the gap now is
> small enough (not 600M on 4G machine anymore) that it's ok and this
> was a safer change.
>
> This is an LRU ordering issue to try to keep the lru balance across
> the zones and not just rotate a lot a single one. I think it can be
> covered in the LRU ordering topic too. But we could also expand it to
> a different slot if we expect too many issues to showup in that
> slot... Hugh what's your opinion?

Yes, that is what I got from the thread discussion and thank you for
confirming that. Guess my question is :

Do we need to do balance across zones by giving the fact that each
zone does its own balancing?
What is the problem we saw without doing the cross-zone balancing?

I don't have data to back-up either way, and that is something I am
interested too :)

--Ying


>
> The subtopics that comes to mind for that topic so far would be:
>
> - reclaim latency
> - compaction issues (Mel)
> - lru ordering altered by compaction/migrate/khugepaged or other
>  features requiring lru page isolation (Minchan)
> - lru rotation balance across zones in kswapd (balance_gap) (Ying)
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-29 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-03-29 15:35 ` [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency Rik van Riel
2011-03-29 19:05   ` [Lsf] " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:35     ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:39       ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:45       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:53         ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-03-29 21:22     ` Rik van Riel
2011-03-29 22:38       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 22:13     ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-29 23:12       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-30 16:17       ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-30 16:49         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31  0:42           ` Hugh Dickins
2011-03-31 15:15             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31  9:30           ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-31 16:36             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-30 16:59         ` Dan Magenheimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTimv2HWwGf=RicANRv8ouDbqazAysQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).