From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8BD8D0040 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:42:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.65]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p2V0gJnX004868 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:42:19 -0700 Received: from ywo32 (ywo32.prod.google.com [10.192.15.32]) by wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p2V0g58v014023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:42:18 -0700 Received: by ywo32 with SMTP id 32so984720ywo.7 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:42:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110330164906.GE12265@random.random> References: <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site> <4D91FC2D.4090602@redhat.com> <20110329190520.GJ12265@random.random> <20110330161716.GA3876@csn.ul.ie> <20110330164906.GE12265@random.random> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:42:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Lsf] [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency From: Hugh Dickins Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:17:16PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: >> I'd prefer to see OOM-related issues treated as a separate-but-related >> problem if possible so; > > I prefer it too. The OOM killing is already covered in OOM topic from > Hugh, and we can add "OOM detection latency" to it. Thanks for adjusting and updating the schedule, Andrea. I'm way behind in my mailbox and everything else, that was a real help. But last night I did remove that OOM and fork-bomb topic you mischievously added in my name ;-) Yes, I did propose an OOM topic against my name in the working list I sent you a few days ago, but by Monday had concluded that it would be pretty silly for me to get up and spout the few things I have to say about it, in the absence of every one of the people most closely involved and experienced. And on fork-bombs I've even less to say. Of course, none of these sessions are for those named facilitators to lecture the assembled company for half an hour. We can bring it back it there's demand on the day: but right now I'd prefer to keep it as an empty slot, to be decided when the time comes. After all, those FS people, they appear to thrive on empty slots! Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org