linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc patch 1/6] memcg: remove unused retry signal from reclaim
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:22:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinJB0=bcVH9vvNz6_ONy17nBAJbQg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DCBF67A.3060700@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 668 bytes --]

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 05/12/2011 10:53 AM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
>> If the memcg reclaim code detects the target memcg below its limit it
>> exits and returns a guaranteed non-zero value so that the charge is
>> retried.
>>
>> Nowadays, the charge side checks the memcg limit itself and does not
>> rely on this non-zero return value trick.
>>
>> This patch removes it.  The reclaim code will now always return the
>> true number of pages it reclaimed on its own.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner<hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>>
>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>
>

Acked-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1327 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-12 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-12 14:53 [rfc patch 0/6] mm: memcg naturalization Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 14:53 ` [rfc patch 1/6] memcg: remove unused retry signal from reclaim Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 15:02   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-12 17:22     ` Ying Han [this message]
2011-05-12 23:44   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-13  9:23   ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-12 14:53 ` [rfc patch 2/6] vmscan: make distinction between memcg reclaim and LRU list selection Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 15:33   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-12 16:03     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-17  6:38       ` Ying Han
2011-05-17  8:25         ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 23:50   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-13  6:58     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-16 22:36       ` Andrew Morton
2011-05-12 14:53 ` [rfc patch 3/6] mm: memcg-aware global reclaim Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 16:04   ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-12 19:19   ` Ying Han
2011-05-13  7:08     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-13  0:04   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-13  7:18     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-13  0:40   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-05-13  6:54     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-13  9:53   ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-13 10:28     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-13 11:02       ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-12 14:53 ` [rfc patch 4/6] memcg: reclaim statistics Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 19:33   ` Ying Han
2011-05-16 23:10     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-17  0:20       ` Ying Han
2011-05-17  7:42         ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-17 13:55           ` Rik van Riel
2011-05-12 14:53 ` [rfc patch 5/6] memcg: remove global LRU list Johannes Weiner
2011-05-13  9:53   ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-13 10:36     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-13 11:01       ` Michal Hocko
2011-05-12 14:53 ` [rfc patch 6/6] memcg: rework soft limit reclaim Johannes Weiner
2011-05-12 18:41   ` Ying Han
2011-05-12 18:53 ` [rfc patch 0/6] mm: memcg naturalization Ying Han
2011-05-13  7:20   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-17  0:53     ` Ying Han
2011-05-17  8:11       ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-17 14:45         ` Ying Han
2011-05-16 10:30 ` Balbir Singh
2011-05-16 10:57   ` Johannes Weiner
2011-05-17  6:32     ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTinJB0=bcVH9vvNz6_ONy17nBAJbQg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).