From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon_vma->lock to mutex
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:47:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinptaydNvK4ZvGvy0KVLnRmmza7tA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308255972.17300.450.camel@schen9-DESK>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> I ran exim with different kernel versions. Using 2.6.39-vanilla
> kernel as a baseline, the results are as follow:
>
> Throughput
> 2.6.39(vanilla) 100.0%
> 2.6.39+ra-patch 166.7% (+66.7%) (note: tmpfs readahead patchset is merged in 3.0-rc2)
> 3.0-rc2(vanilla) 68.0% (-32%)
> 3.0-rc2+linus 115.7% (+15.7%)
> 3.0-rc2+linus+softirq 86.2% (-17.3%)
Ok, so batching the semaphore operations makes more of a difference
than I would have expected.
I guess I'll cook up an improved patch that does it for the vma exit
case too, and see if that just makes the semaphores be a non-issue.
> I also notice that the run to run variations have increased quite a bit for 3.0-rc2.
> I'm using 6 runs per kernel. Perhaps a side effect of converting the anon_vma->lock to mutex?
So the thing about using the mutexes is that heavy contention on a
spinlock is very stable: it may be *slow*, but it's reliable, nicely
queued, and has very few surprises.
On a mutex, heavy contention results in very subtle behavior, with the
adaptive spinning often - but certainly not always - making the mutex
act as a spinlock, but once you have lots of contention the adaptive
spinning breaks down. And then you have lots of random interactions
with the scheduler and 'need_resched' etc.
The only valid answer to lock contention is invariably always just
"don't do that then". We've been pretty good at getting rid of
problematic locks, but this one clearly isn't one of the ones we've
fixed ;)
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-16 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 0:29 REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon_vma->lock to mutex Tim Chen
2011-06-15 0:36 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-17 19:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-15 1:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-15 3:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-15 1:26 ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-15 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 12:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 16:18 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-15 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 16:47 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-15 18:43 ` Tim Chen
2011-06-15 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 20:57 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-15 21:12 ` Tim Chen
2011-06-15 21:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 21:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-15 22:19 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-16 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-16 20:14 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-16 20:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 0:24 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-17 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-15 22:15 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-16 1:08 ` Tim Chen
2011-06-16 1:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-16 20:26 ` Tim Chen
2011-06-16 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2011-06-16 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-16 21:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-16 21:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 3:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 16:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 17:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-17 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 18:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 18:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 20:19 ` Tim Chen
2011-06-17 22:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-06-18 4:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 19:53 ` [PATCH] mm, memory-failure: Fix spinlock vs mutex order Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-17 20:04 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-17 16:46 ` REGRESSION: Performance regressions from switching anon_vma->lock to mutex Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-17 19:40 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-18 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-17 18:22 ` Tim Chen
2011-06-17 19:05 ` Ray Lee
2011-06-16 22:00 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-15 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-15 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-15 19:24 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-15 20:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-15 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-15 20:12 ` [GIT PULL] " Ingo Molnar
2011-06-15 20:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-15 20:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-15 20:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-15 21:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-15 21:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-15 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-16 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 17:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-16 20:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 21:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-16 23:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-17 15:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-16 21:02 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-16 22:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-16 22:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-16 22:47 ` Andi Kleen
2011-06-16 22:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-17 0:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-17 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-17 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-16 23:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-15 20:13 ` Tim Chen
2011-06-15 20:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-15 20:21 ` Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTinptaydNvK4ZvGvy0KVLnRmmza7tA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).