From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com (mail6.bemta12.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.247]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF61900194 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:22:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kpbe13.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe13.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p5O1MJE0025146 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:22:20 -0700 Received: from gxk9 (gxk9.prod.google.com [10.202.11.9]) by kpbe13.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p5O1MIOg032401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:22:18 -0700 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so1229872gxk.12 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:22:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110624010835.GQ3263@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1308741534-6846-1-git-send-email-sassmann@kpanic.de> <20110623133950.GB28333@srcf.ucam.org> <4E0348E0.7050808@kpanic.de> <20110623141222.GA30003@srcf.ucam.org> <4E035DD1.1030603@kpanic.de> <20110623170014.GN3263@one.firstfloor.org> <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D5301E938F2FD@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> <20110624010835.GQ3263@one.firstfloor.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:22:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) From: Craig Bergstrom Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andi Kleen Cc: "Luck, Tony" , Stefan Assmann , Matthew Garrett , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mingo@elte.hu" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "rick@vanrein.org" , "rdunlap@xenotime.net" On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> We (Google) are working on a data-driven answer for this question. =A0I = know >> that there has been some analysis on this topic on the past, but I don't >> want to speculate until we've had some time to put all the pieces togeth= er. >> =A0Stay tuned for specifics. > > It would be also good if you posted your kernel patches. > > It's highly unusual -- to say the least -- to let someone's openly > developed and posted patchkit compete with someone's else secret > internal solution for review purposes. Hi Andi, This is quite hard to argue with. Let me see what I can do. Cheers, CraigB > -Andi > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org