Re: [PATCH 1/1] kexec: Use %pe format specifier for error pointer printing

[Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1245 bytes --]

Sure. Will include it

On Fri, Oct 31, 2025, 4:09 PM Yanjun.Zhu <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev> wrote:

> Hi, Pasha
>
> I noticed that you are moving kexec_handover.c from the kernel/ directory
> to kernel/liveupdate/.
>
> Several developers suggested that I resend my patch after your patch
> series is merged upstream.
> Therefore, I’d like to ask if you could include my patch in your series.
> This would help avoid extra work on my side to resend the commit later.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yanjun.Zhu
> On 10/21/25 2:41 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 08:03:20PM +0000, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>
> Make pr_xxx() call to use the %pe format specifier instead of %d.
> The %pe specifier prints a symbolic error string (e.g., -ENOMEM,
> -EINVAL) when given an error pointer created with ERR_PTR(err).
>
> This change enhances the clarity and diagnostic value of the error
> message by showing a descriptive error name rather than a numeric
> error code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev> <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> This looks good to me, even though I note that this file
> has moved in linux-next.
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> <horms@kernel.org>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1940 bytes --]