From: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
kernel-team@android.com, aarcange@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com,
david@redhat.com, axelrasmussen@google.com, bgeffon@google.com,
willy@infradead.org, jannh@google.com, kaleshsingh@google.com,
ngeoffray@google.com, timmurray@google.com, rppt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] per-vma locks in userfaultfd
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 13:58:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EESO5dNSg1d4L37hMbhuT-poD4R3ttBoEQdPvWEy7xHjD1oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240129203904.7dcugltsjajldlea@revolver>
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:39 PM Liam R. Howlett
<Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> * Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com> [240129 14:35]:
> > Performing userfaultfd operations (like copy/move etc.) in critical
> > section of mmap_lock (read-mode) causes significant contention on the
> > lock when operations requiring the lock in write-mode are taking place
> > concurrently. We can use per-vma locks instead to significantly reduce
> > the contention issue.
>
> Is this really an issue? I'm surprised so much userfaultfd work is
> happening to create contention. Can you share some numbers and how your
> patch set changes the performance?
>
In Android we are using userfaultfd for Android Runtime's GC
compaction. mmap-lock (write-mode) operations like mmap/munmap/mlock
happening simultaneously elsewhere in the process caused significant
contention. Of course, this doesn't happen during every compaction,
but whenever it does it leads to a jittery experience for the user.
During one such reproducible scenario, we observed the following
improvements with this patch-set:
- Wall clock time of compaction phase came down from ~3s to less than 500ms
- Uninterruptible sleep time (across all threads in the process) was
~10ms (none was in mmap_lock) during compaction, instead of >20s
I will add these numbers in the cover letter in the next version of
this patchset.
> >
> > Changes since v1 [1]:
> > - rebase patches on 'mm-unstable' branch
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240126182647.2748949-1-lokeshgidra@google.com/
> >
> > Lokesh Gidra (3):
> > userfaultfd: move userfaultfd_ctx struct to header file
> > userfaultfd: protect mmap_changing with rw_sem in userfaulfd_ctx
> > userfaultfd: use per-vma locks in userfaultfd operations
> >
> > fs/userfaultfd.c | 86 ++++---------
> > include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 75 ++++++++---
> > mm/userfaultfd.c | 229 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 3 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog
> >
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 19:35 [PATCH v2 0/3] per-vma locks in userfaultfd Lokesh Gidra
2024-01-29 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] userfaultfd: move userfaultfd_ctx struct to header file Lokesh Gidra
2024-01-30 7:12 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-01-29 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] userfaultfd: protect mmap_changing with rw_sem in userfaulfd_ctx Lokesh Gidra
2024-01-29 21:00 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-29 22:35 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-01-30 3:46 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-30 8:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-01-30 17:28 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-31 2:24 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-04 10:27 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-02-05 20:53 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-07 15:27 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-02-07 20:24 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-12 8:14 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-01-30 7:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-01-29 19:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] userfaultfd: use per-vma locks in userfaultfd operations Lokesh Gidra
2024-01-29 20:36 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-29 20:52 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-01-29 21:18 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-30 0:28 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-01-30 2:58 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-31 2:49 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-01-31 21:41 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-05 21:46 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-02-05 21:54 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-05 22:00 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-05 22:24 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-06 14:35 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-06 16:26 ` Lokesh Gidra
2024-02-06 17:07 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-31 3:03 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-01-31 21:43 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-29 20:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] per-vma locks in userfaultfd Liam R. Howlett
2024-01-29 21:58 ` Lokesh Gidra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+EESO5dNSg1d4L37hMbhuT-poD4R3ttBoEQdPvWEy7xHjD1oQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lokeshgidra@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ngeoffray@google.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=timmurray@google.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).