From: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
To: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, cl@gentwo.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mhocko@suse.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, will@kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, srivatsa@csail.mit.edu, haowenchao22@gmail.com,
hughd@google.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, peterx@redhat.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
jglisse@google.com, surenb@google.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com,
zokeefe@google.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, raquini@redhat.com, dev.jain@arm.com,
sunnanyong@huawei.com, usamaarif642@gmail.com, audra@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, tiwai@suse.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/9] introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to unify khugepaged and madvise_collapse
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:24:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA1CXcA1btm3ddHzKfrCZcce8=ekVKfbo84=4SegabQSgqoeWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d1fed22-5ba8-433b-9ef9-478b337b10d5@arm.com>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 9:26 AM Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2025 00:30, Nico Pache wrote:
> > The khugepaged daemon and madvise_collapse have two different
> > implementations that do almost the same thing.
> >
> > Create khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to increase code
> > reuse and create an entry point for future khugepaged changes.
> >
> > Refactor madvise_collapse and khugepaged_scan_mm_slot to use
> > the new khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > mm/khugepaged.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 5f0be134141e..46faee67378b 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -2365,6 +2365,52 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Try to collapse a single PMD starting at a PMD aligned addr, and return
> > + * the results.
> > + */
> > +static int khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd(unsigned long addr, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma, bool *mmap_locked,
> > + struct collapse_control *cc)
>
> nit: given the vma links to the mm is it really neccessary to pass both? Why not
> just pass vma?
Ah good point!
>
> > +{
> > + int result = SCAN_FAIL;
> > + unsigned long tva_flags = cc->is_khugepaged ? TVA_ENFORCE_SYSFS : 0;
> > +
> > + if (!*mmap_locked) {
> > + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > + *mmap_locked = true;
> > + }
>
> AFAICT, the read lock is always held when khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd() is
> called. Perhaps VM_WARN_ON(!*mmap_locked) would be more appropriate?
Hmm, I'm actually not sure why that's there. Its probably left over
from a previous change I was trying a while back.
>
> > +
> > + if (thp_vma_allowable_order(vma, vma->vm_flags,
> > + tva_flags, PMD_ORDER)) {
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHMEM) && !vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
>
> I guess it was like this before, but what's the relevance of CONFIG_SHMEM?
> Surely this should work for any file if CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS is enabled?
Yeah I think David brought up a similar point during one of our
meetings. I'm just combining the collapse users, so I'll leave it for
now.
>
> > + struct file *file = get_file(vma->vm_file);
> > + pgoff_t pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, addr);
> > +
> > + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > + *mmap_locked = false;
> > + result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm, addr, file, pgoff,
> > + cc);
> > + fput(file);
> > + if (result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
> > + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > + if (hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm))
> > + goto end;
> > + result = collapse_pte_mapped_thp(mm, addr,
> > + !cc->is_khugepaged);
> > + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > + }
> > + } else {
> > + result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,
> > + mmap_locked, cc);
> > + }
> > + if (result == SCAN_SUCCEED || result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
> > + ++khugepaged_pages_collapsed;
>
> Looks like this counter was previously only incremented for the scan path, not
> for the madvise_collapse path. Not sure if that's a problem?
Yep! Usama noted that too, already fixed in the next version :)
Thanks!
-- Nico
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> > + }
> > +end:
> > + return result;
> > +}
> > +
> > static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
> > struct collapse_control *cc)
> > __releases(&khugepaged_mm_lock)
> > @@ -2439,33 +2485,9 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages, int *result,
> > VM_BUG_ON(khugepaged_scan.address < hstart ||
> > khugepaged_scan.address + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE >
> > hend);
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHMEM) && !vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
> > - struct file *file = get_file(vma->vm_file);
> > - pgoff_t pgoff = linear_page_index(vma,
> > - khugepaged_scan.address);
> >
> > - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > - mmap_locked = false;
> > - *result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm,
> > - khugepaged_scan.address, file, pgoff, cc);
> > - fput(file);
> > - if (*result == SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE) {
> > - mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > - if (hpage_collapse_test_exit_or_disable(mm))
> > - goto breakouterloop;
> > - *result = collapse_pte_mapped_thp(mm,
> > - khugepaged_scan.address, false);
> > - if (*result == SCAN_PMD_MAPPED)
> > - *result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
> > - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > - }
> > - } else {
> > - *result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma,
> > - khugepaged_scan.address, &mmap_locked, cc);
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (*result == SCAN_SUCCEED)
> > - ++khugepaged_pages_collapsed;
> > + *result = khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd(khugepaged_scan.address,
> > + mm, vma, &mmap_locked, cc);
> >
> > /* move to next address */
> > khugepaged_scan.address += HPAGE_PMD_SIZE;
> > @@ -2785,36 +2807,18 @@ int madvise_collapse(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct **prev,
> > mmap_assert_locked(mm);
> > memset(cc->node_load, 0, sizeof(cc->node_load));
> > nodes_clear(cc->alloc_nmask);
> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHMEM) && !vma_is_anonymous(vma)) {
> > - struct file *file = get_file(vma->vm_file);
> > - pgoff_t pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, addr);
> >
> > - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > - mmap_locked = false;
> > - result = hpage_collapse_scan_file(mm, addr, file, pgoff,
> > - cc);
> > - fput(file);
> > - } else {
> > - result = hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(mm, vma, addr,
> > - &mmap_locked, cc);
> > - }
> > + result = khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd(addr, mm, vma, &mmap_locked, cc);
> > +
> > if (!mmap_locked)
> > *prev = NULL; /* Tell caller we dropped mmap_lock */
> >
> > -handle_result:
> > switch (result) {
> > case SCAN_SUCCEED:
> > case SCAN_PMD_MAPPED:
> > ++thps;
> > break;
> > case SCAN_PTE_MAPPED_HUGEPAGE:
> > - BUG_ON(mmap_locked);
> > - BUG_ON(*prev);
> > - mmap_read_lock(mm);
> > - result = collapse_pte_mapped_thp(mm, addr, true);
> > - mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> > - goto handle_result;
> > - /* Whitelisted set of results where continuing OK */
> > case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
> > case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
> > case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-18 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 0:30 [RFC v2 0/9] khugepaged: mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 1/9] introduce khugepaged_collapse_single_pmd to unify khugepaged and madvise_collapse Nico Pache
2025-02-17 17:11 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-17 19:56 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-18 22:24 ` Nico Pache [this message]
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 2/9] khugepaged: rename hpage_collapse_* to khugepaged_* Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:29 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 3/9] khugepaged: generalize hugepage_vma_revalidate for mTHP support Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 4/9] khugepaged: generalize alloc_charge_folio " Nico Pache
2025-02-19 15:29 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 5/9] khugepaged: generalize __collapse_huge_page_* " Nico Pache
2025-02-19 15:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19 16:02 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 6/9] khugepaged: introduce khugepaged_scan_bitmap " Nico Pache
2025-02-17 7:27 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:12 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-19 16:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-20 18:48 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 7/9] khugepaged: add " Nico Pache
2025-02-12 17:04 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-12 18:16 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-17 20:55 ` Usama Arif
2025-02-17 21:22 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 4:22 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-03 19:18 ` Nico Pache
2025-03-04 5:10 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-19 16:52 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-03 19:13 ` Nico Pache
2025-03-05 9:11 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-05 9:07 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-07 6:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-07 20:14 ` Nico Pache
2025-03-10 4:17 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 8/9] khugepaged: improve tracepoints for mTHP orders Nico Pache
2025-02-11 0:30 ` [RFC v2 9/9] khugepaged: skip collapsing mTHP to smaller orders Nico Pache
2025-02-19 16:57 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-11 12:49 ` [RFC v2 0/9] khugepaged: mTHP support Dev Jain
2025-02-12 16:49 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-13 8:26 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-13 11:21 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-13 19:39 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-14 2:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-15 0:52 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-15 6:38 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 8:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:19 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-17 6:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-17 19:15 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-18 16:07 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-18 22:30 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-19 9:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-20 19:12 ` Nico Pache
2025-02-21 4:57 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-19 17:00 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA1CXcA1btm3ddHzKfrCZcce8=ekVKfbo84=4SegabQSgqoeWw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=audra@redhat.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=haowenchao22@gmail.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=raquini@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vishal.moola@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).