From: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
Roger Wang <runanwang@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
jmattson@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 18/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO writes test
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:03:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhR5DHxMYWsBzs=FrjGdBjygEeohz8hMpBAiOJvu6tDKJCGrg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZebeuMoz8izs/SoG@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 3:28 AM Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:46:33PM -0800, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> > The test verifies MMIO writes of various sizes from the guest to the host.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h | 2 +
> > .../selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c | 14 +++
> > .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> > index 13ce60df5684..502b670ea699 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/tdx/tdx.h
> > @@ -25,5 +25,7 @@ uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_wrmsr(uint64_t index, uint64_t value);
> > uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_instruction_hlt(uint64_t interrupt_blocked_flag);
> > uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_read(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
> > uint64_t *data_out);
> > +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
> > + uint64_t data_in);
> >
> > #endif // SELFTEST_TDX_TDX_H
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> > index b19f07ebc0e7..f4afa09f7e3d 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx/tdx.c
> > @@ -143,3 +143,17 @@ uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_read(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > +
> > +uint64_t tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(uint64_t address, uint64_t size,
> > + uint64_t data_in)
> > +{
> > + struct tdx_hypercall_args args = {
> > + .r11 = TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO,
> > + .r12 = size,
> > + .r13 = TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE,
> > + .r14 = address,
> > + .r15 = data_in,
> > + };
> > +
> > + return __tdx_hypercall(&args, 0);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> > index 48902b69d13e..5e28ba828a92 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
> > @@ -885,6 +885,90 @@ void verify_mmio_reads(void)
> > printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> > }
> >
> > +void guest_mmio_writes(void)
> > +{
> > + uint64_t ret;
> > +
> > + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 1, 0x12);
> > + if (ret)
> > + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> > +
> > + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 2, 0x1234);
> > + if (ret)
> > + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> > +
> > + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 4, 0x12345678);
> > + if (ret)
> > + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> > +
> > + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 8, 0x1234567890ABCDEF);
> > + if (ret)
> > + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> > +
> > + // Write across page boundary.
> > + ret = tdg_vp_vmcall_ve_request_mmio_write(PAGE_SIZE - 1, 8, 0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + tdx_test_fatal(ret);
> > +
> > + tdx_test_success();
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Varifies guest MMIO writes.
> > + */
> > +void verify_mmio_writes(void)
> > +{
> > + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> > +
> > + uint8_t byte_1;
> > + uint16_t byte_2;
> > + uint32_t byte_4;
> > + uint64_t byte_8;
> > +
> > + vm = td_create();
> > + td_initialize(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS, 0);
> > + vcpu = td_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_mmio_writes);
> > + td_finalize(vm);
> > +
> > + printf("Verifying TD MMIO writes:\n");
> > +
> > + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 1, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> > + byte_1 = *(uint8_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> > +
> > + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 2, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> > + byte_2 = *(uint16_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> > +
> > + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 4, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> > + byte_4 = *(uint32_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> > +
> > + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_CHECK_GUEST_FAILURE(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_MMIO(vcpu, TDX_MMIO_TEST_ADDR, 8, TDG_VP_VMCALL_VE_REQUEST_MMIO_WRITE);
> > + byte_8 = *(uint64_t *)(vcpu->run->mmio.data);
> > +
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_1, 0x12);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_2, 0x1234);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_4, 0x12345678);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(byte_8, 0x1234567890ABCDEF);
> > +
> > + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->exit_reason, KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT);
> > + TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->system_event.data[1], TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND);
> Is it possible that this event is caused by an failure of the last 8 byte write?
> i.e. though MMIO exit to host with correct value 0x1234567890ABCDEF, but guest
> sees ret as TDG_VP_VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND.
>
> And if, coincidently, guest gets a ret=0 in the next across page boundary write,
> the selftest will show "PASSED", which is not right.
>
We can add another tdx_test_report_to_user_space to synchronize
between guest and host execution making sure that the guest is done
with all the valid writes before testing the negative case.
>
> > + td_vcpu_run(vcpu);
> > + TDX_TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(vcpu);
> > +
> > + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> > + printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > setbuf(stdout, NULL);
> > @@ -905,6 +989,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_msr_reads);
> > run_in_new_process(&verify_guest_hlt);
> > run_in_new_process(&verify_mmio_reads);
> > + run_in_new_process(&verify_mmio_writes);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-30 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-12 20:46 [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/29] KVM: selftests: Add function to allow one-to-one GVA to GPA mappings Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 1:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 19:55 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-21 22:29 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-07-23 19:56 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/29] KVM: selftests: Expose function that sets up sregs based on VM's mode Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:18 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/29] KVM: selftests: Store initial stack address in struct kvm_vcpu Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 2:29 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/29] KVM: selftests: Refactor steps in vCPU descriptor table initialization Sagi Shahar
2024-02-21 5:43 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-23 21:25 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/29] KVM: selftests: Add helper functions to create TDX VMs Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:24 ` Yan Zhao
2024-02-28 16:19 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-21 22:54 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 5:34 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Use KVM_TDX_CAPABILITIES to validate TDs' attribute configuration Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 8:31 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Update load_td_memory_region for VM memory backed by guest memfd Sagi Shahar
2024-02-22 9:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-24 16:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-07-25 18:19 ` Ackerley Tng
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX lifecycle test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-23 1:55 ` Chen Yu
2024-03-01 4:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-01 7:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:20 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2024-04-12 4:42 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-03-22 21:33 ` Chen, Zide
2024-07-25 19:52 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add report_fatal_error test Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 12:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 6:52 ` Binbin Wu
2024-07-25 20:37 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-12 4:56 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-12 11:57 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-15 8:05 ` Ackerley Tng
2024-04-15 10:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-16 18:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-17 22:41 ` Yan Zhao
2024-04-22 21:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-07-28 11:16 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Adding test case for TDX port IO Sagi Shahar
2024-02-29 13:20 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04 2:19 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-04 9:16 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-04 9:18 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-25 22:35 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic TDX CPUID test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add basic get_td_vmcall_info test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:03 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 6:55 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX IO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 8:22 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MSR read/write tests Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:00 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-01 12:09 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 0:22 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:40 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX HLT exit test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:31 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 5:40 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-27 23:23 ` Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO reads test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 7:09 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-21 23:45 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX MMIO writes test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-02 7:58 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-05 8:58 ` Yan Zhao
2024-07-30 19:03 ` Sagi Shahar [this message]
2024-03-21 23:46 ` Zhang, Dongsheng X
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX CPUID TDVMCALL test Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Verify the behavior when host consumes a TD private memory Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 21/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDG.VP.INFO test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-06 4:50 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 22/29] KVM: selftests: Add functions to allow mapping as shared Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 11:09 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886BD37E5E56DAB9A0087A3F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 23/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add shared memory test Sagi Shahar
2024-03-01 12:02 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:36 ` Yan Zhao
2024-03-06 1:20 ` Yan Zhao
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB7886AA5F8A19CDFCB5566B0EF6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-16 6:24 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 24/29] KVM: selftests: Expose _vm_vaddr_alloc Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 9:55 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06 1:49 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 25/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.MEM.PAGE.ACCEPT Sagi Shahar
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 26/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add support for TDG.VP.VEINFO.GET Sagi Shahar
2024-03-04 13:56 ` Binbin Wu
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 27/29] KVM: selftests: Propagate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT to userspace Sagi Shahar
[not found] ` <DS7PR11MB78860170A5FD77253573BC09F6292@DS7PR11MB7886.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2024-03-14 21:46 ` Chen, Zide
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 28/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftest Sagi Shahar
2024-03-05 4:57 ` Binbin Wu
2024-03-06 8:54 ` Yan Zhao
2023-12-12 20:46 ` [RFC PATCH v5 29/29] KVM: selftests: TDX: Add TDX UPM selftests for implicit conversion Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:10 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:15 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:18 ` Verma, Vishal L
2024-06-05 20:42 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 20:56 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-05 21:34 ` Sagi Shahar
2024-06-05 21:44 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 2:51 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2024-06-21 20:52 ` Sagi Shahar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAhR5DHxMYWsBzs=FrjGdBjygEeohz8hMpBAiOJvu6tDKJCGrg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sagis@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=afranji@google.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=erdemaktas@google.com \
--cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=runanwang@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).