linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	kernel-team@lge.com,  Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] mm/swap: charge the page when adding to the swap cache
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:57:11 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4MWwDwqtXukHZ48g9O40DPJeidJmKdG5pMV4k9TefMfkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200417033116.GJ195132@cmpxchg.org>

2020년 4월 17일 (금) 오후 12:31, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>님이 작성:
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:38:53AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > 2020년 4월 17일 (금) 오전 1:11, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>님이 작성:
> > >
> > > Hello Joonsoo,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:40:43PM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
> > > >   * but sets SwapCache flag and private instead of mapping and index.
> > > >   */
> > > >  int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry,
> > > > -                     gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
> > > > +                     struct vm_area_struct *vma, gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
> > > >  {
> > > >       struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
> > > >       pgoff_t idx = swp_offset(entry);
> > > > @@ -120,14 +120,26 @@ int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry,
> > > >       unsigned long i, nr = compound_nr(page);
> > > >       unsigned long nrexceptional = 0;
> > > >       void *old;
> > > > +     bool compound = !!compound_order(page);
> > > > +     int error;
> > > > +     struct mm_struct *mm = vma ? vma->vm_mm : current->mm;
> > > > +     struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > > >
> > > >       VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
> > > >       VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
> > > >       VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageSwapBacked(page), page);
> > > >
> > > >       page_ref_add(page, nr);
> > > > +     /* PageSwapCache() prevent the page from being re-charged */
> > > >       SetPageSwapCache(page);
> > > >
> > > > +     error = mem_cgroup_try_charge(page, mm, gfp, &memcg, compound);
> > > > +     if (error) {
> > > > +             ClearPageSwapCache(page);
> > > > +             page_ref_sub(page, nr);
> > > > +             return error;
> > > > +     }
> > > > +
> > > >       do {
> > > >               xas_lock_irq(&xas);
> > > >               xas_create_range(&xas);
> > > > @@ -153,11 +165,16 @@ int add_to_swap_cache(struct page *page, swp_entry_t entry,
> > > >               xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
> > > >       } while (xas_nomem(&xas, gfp));
> > > >
> > > > -     if (!xas_error(&xas))
> > > > +     if (!xas_error(&xas)) {
> > > > +             mem_cgroup_commit_charge(page, memcg, false, compound);
> > >
> > > Unfortunately you cannot commit here yet because the rmap isn't set up
> > > and that will cause memcg_charge_statistics() to account the page
> > > incorrectly as file. And rmap is only set up during a page fault.
> >
> > I also found this problem a few days ago. In my investigation, what we need for
> > anonymous page to make accounting correct is a way to find the type of the page,
> > file or anon, since there is no special code to use the rmap. And, I
> > think that it
> > could be done by checking NULL mapping or something else.
>
> page->mapping is NULL for truncated file pages, file pages before they
> are inserted into the page cache, and anon pages before the rmap. It's
> not straight-forward to robustly tell those apart inside memcg.

Okay.

> But fundamentally, it's a silly problem to fix. We only need to tell
> page types apart to maintain the MEMCG_CACHE and MEMCG_RSS
> counters. But these are unnecessary duplicates of the NR_FILE_PAGES
> and NR_ANON_MAPPED vmstat counters - counters for which we already
> have accounting sites in generic code, and that already exist in the
> per-cgroup vmstat arrays. We just need to link them.
>
> So that's what I'm fixing instead: I'm adjusting the charging sequence
> slightly so that page->mem_cgroup is stable when the core VM code
> accounts pages by type. And then I'm hooking into these places with
> mod_lruvec_page_state and friends, and ditching MEMCG_CACHE/MEMCG_RSS.
>
> After that, memcg doesn't have to know about the types of pages at
> all. It can focus on maintaining page_counters and page->mem_cgroup,
> and leave the vmstat breakdown to generic VM code.
>
> Then we can charge pages right after allocation, regardless of type.
>
> [ Eventually, the memcg accounting interface shouldn't be much more
>   than GFP_ACCOUNT (with memalloc_use_memcg() for faults, swap etc.),
>   and the vmstat hooks. My patches don't quite get there, but that's
>   the direction they're pushing. ]

Thanks for explanation! It will help me understand your future patches.

> > Is there anything I missed? And, I cannot find the function,
> > memcg_charge_statistics(). Please let me know the file name of this
> > function.
>
> The correct name is mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(), my apologies.

No problem.

> > > This needs a bit of a rework of the memcg charging code that appears
> > > out of scope for your patches. I'm preparing a series right now to do
> > > just that. It'll also fix the swap ownership tracking problem when the
> > > swap controller is disabled, so we don't have to choose between
> > > charging the wrong cgroup or hampering swap readahead efficiency.
> >
> > Sound good! I also think that these patches are out of scope of my series.
> > I will wait your patches. Could you let me know when your series is submitted?
> > I'd like to plan my work schedule based on your patch schedule.
>
> I just finished the first draft of the series a few minutes ago. I'll
> polish it a bit, make sure it compiles etc. ;-), and send it out for
> review, testing and rebasing, hopefully tomorrow or early next week.

Sound good! See you again next week. :)

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-17  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-03  5:40 [PATCH v5 00/10] workingset protection/detection on the anonymous LRU list js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] mm/vmscan: make active/inactive ratio as 1:1 for anon lru js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] mm/vmscan: protect the workingset on anonymous LRU js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] mm/workingset: extend the workingset detection for anon LRU js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] mm/swapcache: support to handle the exceptional entries in swapcache js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] mm/swap: charge the page when adding to the swap cache js1304
2020-04-03 18:29   ` Yang Shi
2020-04-06  1:03     ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-04-07  0:22       ` Yang Shi
2020-04-07  1:27         ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-04-16 16:11   ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-17  1:38     ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-04-17  3:31       ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-17  3:57         ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] mm/swap: implement workingset detection for anonymous LRU js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] mm/workingset: support to remember the previous owner of the page js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] mm/swap: do not readahead if the previous owner of the swap entry isn't me js1304
2020-04-03  5:40 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] mm/vmscan: restore active/inactive ratio for anonymous LRU js1304
2020-04-03  5:45 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] mm/swap: reinforce the reclaim_stat changed by anon LRU algorithm change js1304
2020-04-06  9:18 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] mm/vmscan: protect the workingset on anonymous LRU Hillf Danton
2020-04-07  0:40   ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-04-06 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] mm/swap: charge the page when adding to the swap cache Hillf Danton
2020-04-07  0:42   ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-04-07  2:21   ` Hillf Danton
2020-04-09  0:53     ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-04-08 16:55 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] workingset protection/detection on the anonymous LRU list Vlastimil Babka
2020-04-09  0:50   ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-06-03  3:57     ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2020-06-03  5:46       ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAmzW4MWwDwqtXukHZ48g9O40DPJeidJmKdG5pMV4k9TefMfkQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).