From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f72.google.com (mail-wm0-f72.google.com [74.125.82.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C3D828E2 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:21:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f72.google.com with SMTP id c82so19982194wme.2 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10si4523026lfd.348.2016.07.01.07.21.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id l188so78291395lfe.2 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 07:21:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57767BCA.8010305@virtuozzo.com> References: <1467381733-18314-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> <57767BCA.8010305@virtuozzo.com> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 16:20:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kasan/quarantine: fix bugs on qlist_move_cache() Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Alexander Potapenko , kasan-dev , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML , Joonsoo Kim On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > > > On 07/01/2016 05:15 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >>> 2016-07-01 23:03 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Vyukov : > >>>>> + >>>>> + if (obj_cache == cache) >>>>> + qlist_put(to, qlink, cache->size); >>>>> + else >>>>> + qlist_put(from, qlink, cache->size); >>>> >>>> This line is wrong. If obj_cache != cache, object size != cache->size. >>>> Quarantine contains objects of different sizes. >>> >>> You're right. 11 pm is not good time to work. :/ >>> If it is fixed, the patch looks correct to you? >>> I will fix it and send v4 on next week. >> >> >> I don't see anything else wrong. But I need to see how you fix the size issue. >> Performance of this operation is not particularly critical, so the >> simpler the better. > > Is there any other way besides obvious: s/cache->size/obj_cache->size ? We can remember the original bytes, then subtract num_objects_moved*cache->size from it and assign to from->bytes. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org