linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: balbi@ti.com, Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: Page allocation failure on v3.8-rc5
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:33:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVO415U1amgUUOoy_1CLjfUqw98QqD8mCVixAzNQ2_Nzqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130131154331.09d157a3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 19:53:22 +0800
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> The allocation failure is caused by the big sizeof(struct parsed_partitions),
>> which is 64K in my 32bit box,
>
> Geeze.
>
> We could fix that nicely by making parsed_partitions.parts an array of
> pointers to a single `struct parsed_partition' and allocating those
> on-demand.
>
> But given the short-lived nature of this storage and the infrequency of
> check_partition(), that isn't necessary.
>
>> could you test the blow patch to see
>> if it can fix the allocation failure?
>
> (The patch is wordwrapped)

Sorry for that, I send out it for test.

>
>> ...
>>
>> @@ -106,18 +107,43 @@ static int (*check_part[])(struct parsed_partitions *) = {
>>       NULL
>>  };
>>
>> +struct parsed_partitions *allocate_partitions(int nr)
>> +{
>> +     struct parsed_partitions *state;
>> +
>> +     state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct parsed_partitions), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> I personally prefer sizefo(*state) here.  It means the reader doesn't
> have to scroll back to check things.

OK, will use sizeof(*state).

>> +     if (!state)
>> +             return NULL;
>> +
>> +     state->parts = vzalloc(nr * sizeof(state->parts[0]));
>> +     if (!state->parts) {
>> +             kfree(state);
>> +             return NULL;
>> +     }
>
> It doesn't really need to be this complex - we could just vmalloc the
> entire `struct parsed_partitions'.  But I see that your change will

The above approach can save one 32K allocation approximately.

> cause us to allcoate much less memory in many situations, which is
> good.  It should be mentioned in the changelog!

OK, I will add the changelog later.


Thanks,
--
Ming Lei

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28  9:10 Page allocation failure on v3.8-rc5 Felipe Balbi
2013-01-30 11:53 ` Ming Lei
2013-01-31 23:43   ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-01  0:33     ` Ming Lei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACVXFVO415U1amgUUOoy_1CLjfUqw98QqD8mCVixAzNQ2_Nzqw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).