linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Cc: shy828301@gmail.com, tongtiangen@huawei.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	 naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mm/khugepaged: recover from poisoned anonymous memory
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 11:28:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACw3F50LHFe=DOnX+y16evogOnB-npZvPF46mgF8TCBRUVByRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221011235918.hvefriya4m3qdhr2@box.shutemov.name>

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 4:59 PM Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:01:41AM -0700, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
> > Make __collapse_huge_page_copy return whether
> > collapsing/copying anonymous pages succeeded,
> > and make collapse_huge_page handle the return status.
> >
> > Break existing PTE scan loop into two for-loops.
> > The first loop copies source pages into target huge page,
> > and can fail gracefully when running into memory errors in
> > source pages. If copying all pages succeeds, the second loop
> > releases and clears up these normal pages.
> > Otherwise, the second loop does the following to
> > roll back the page table and page states:
> > 1) re-establish the original PTEs-to-PMD connection.
> > 2) release source pages back to their LRU list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/highmem.h            |  19 +++++
> >  include/trace/events/huge_memory.h |   3 +-
> >  mm/khugepaged.c                    | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
> > index 25679035ca283..91a65bdabcb33 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/highmem.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
> > @@ -332,6 +332,25 @@ static inline void copy_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from)
> >
> >  #endif
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Machine check exception handled version of copy_highpage.
> > + * Return true if copying page content failed; otherwise false.
> > + * Note handling #MC requires arch opt-in.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool copy_highpage_mc(struct page *to, struct page *from)
> > +{
> > +     char *vfrom, *vto;
> > +     unsigned long ret;
> > +
> > +     vfrom = kmap_local_page(from);
> > +     vto = kmap_local_page(to);
> > +     ret = copy_mc_to_kernel(vto, vfrom, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +     kunmap_local(vto);
> > +     kunmap_local(vfrom);
> > +
> > +     return ret > 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static inline void memcpy_page(struct page *dst_page, size_t dst_off,
> >                              struct page *src_page, size_t src_off,
> >                              size_t len)
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h
> > index d651f3437367d..756e991366639 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h
> > @@ -33,7 +33,8 @@
> >       EM( SCAN_ALLOC_HUGE_PAGE_FAIL,  "alloc_huge_page_failed")       \
> >       EM( SCAN_CGROUP_CHARGE_FAIL,    "ccgroup_charge_failed")        \
> >       EM( SCAN_TRUNCATED,             "truncated")                    \
> > -     EMe(SCAN_PAGE_HAS_PRIVATE,      "page_has_private")             \
> > +     EM( SCAN_PAGE_HAS_PRIVATE,      "page_has_private")             \
> > +     EMe(SCAN_COPY_MC,               "copy_poisoned_page")           \
> >
> >  #undef EM
> >  #undef EMe
> > diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > index 70b7ac66411c0..552e7cb4c8b42 100644
> > --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> > +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ enum scan_result {
> >       SCAN_CGROUP_CHARGE_FAIL,
> >       SCAN_TRUNCATED,
> >       SCAN_PAGE_HAS_PRIVATE,
> > +     SCAN_COPY_MC,
> >  };
> >
> >  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> > @@ -673,44 +674,99 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static void __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte_t *pte, struct page *page,
> > -                                   struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > -                                   unsigned long address,
> > -                                   spinlock_t *ptl,
> > -                                   struct list_head *compound_pagelist)
> > +/*
> > + * __collapse_huge_page_copy - attempts to copy memory contents from normal
> > + * pages to a hugepage. Cleanup the normal pages if copying succeeds;
> > + * otherwise restore the original page table and release isolated normal pages.
> > + * Returns true if copying succeeds, otherwise returns false.
> > + *
> > + * @pte: starting of the PTEs to copy from
> > + * @page: the new hugepage to copy contents to
> > + * @pmd: pointer to the new hugepage's PMD
> > + * @rollback: the original normal pages' PMD
> > + * @vma: the original normal pages' virtual memory area
> > + * @address: starting address to copy
> > + * @pte_ptl: lock on normal pages' PTEs
> > + * @compound_pagelist: list that stores compound pages
> > + */
> > +static bool __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte_t *pte,
> > +                             struct page *page,
> > +                             pmd_t *pmd,
> > +                             pmd_t rollback,
> > +                             struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                             unsigned long address,
> > +                             spinlock_t *pte_ptl,
> > +                             struct list_head *compound_pagelist)
> >  {
> >       struct page *src_page, *tmp;
> >       pte_t *_pte;
> > -     for (_pte = pte; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > -                             _pte++, page++, address += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > -             pte_t pteval = *_pte;
> > +     pte_t pteval;
> > +     unsigned long _address;
> > +     spinlock_t *pmd_ptl;
> > +     bool copy_succeeded = true;
> >
> > +     /*
> > +      * Copying pages' contents is subject to memory poison at any iteration.
> > +      */
> > +     for (_pte = pte, _address = address;
> > +                     _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > +                     _pte++, page++, _address += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +             pteval = *_pte;
> > +
> > +             if (pte_none(pteval) || is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval)))
> > +                     clear_user_highpage(page, _address);
> > +             else {
> > +                     src_page = pte_page(pteval);
> > +                     if (copy_highpage_mc(page, src_page)) {
> > +                             copy_succeeded = false;
> > +                             break;
> > +                     }
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (!copy_succeeded) {
> > +             /*
> > +              * Copying failed, re-establish the regular PMD that points to
> > +              * the regular page table. Restoring PMD needs to be done prior
> > +              * to releasing pages. Since pages are still isolated and locked
> > +              * here, acquiring anon_vma_lock_write is unnecessary.
> > +              */
> > +             pmd_ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd);
> > +             pmd_populate(vma->vm_mm, pmd, pmd_pgtable(rollback));
> > +             spin_unlock(pmd_ptl);
> > +     }
>
> Initially I expected return here, but you handle copy_succeeded below. Hm.

If !copy_succeeded, after re-populate PMD, I believe the remaining
rollback operation is to undo 3 things in
__collapse_huge_page_isolate(). Please see my next 2 replies for
details.

>
> > +
> > +     for (_pte = pte, _address = address; _pte < pte + HPAGE_PMD_NR;
> > +                     _pte++, _address += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > +             pteval = *_pte;
> >               if (pte_none(pteval) || is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval))) {
> > -                     clear_user_highpage(page, address);
> > -                     add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES, 1);
> > -                     if (is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval))) {
> > -                             /*
> > -                              * ptl mostly unnecessary.
> > -                              */
> > -                             spin_lock(ptl);
> > -                             ptep_clear(vma->vm_mm, address, _pte);
> > -                             spin_unlock(ptl);
> > +                     if (copy_succeeded) {
> > +                             add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES, 1);
> > +                             if (is_zero_pfn(pte_pfn(pteval))) {
> > +                                     /*
> > +                                      * pte_ptl mostly unnecessary.
> > +                                      */
> > +                                     spin_lock(pte_ptl);
> > +                                     pte_clear(vma->vm_mm, _address, _pte);
> > +                                     spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
> > +                             }
> >                       }
>
> So this branch is NOP if !copy_succeeded, right?

Yes, if (pte_none || zero_pfn) we don't need any rollback operations,
because the 1st loop doesn't add_mm_counter() and doesn't
ptep_clear().

>
> >               } else {
> >                       src_page = pte_page(pteval);
> > -                     copy_user_highpage(page, src_page, address, vma);
> >                       if (!PageCompound(src_page))
> >                               release_pte_page(src_page);
>
> And this branch only calls release_pte_page() (Which I believe would screw
> up statistic).

Elsewise (!pte_none && !zero_pfn), rollback needs to do these things
if !copy_succeeded:
1. unlock_page(src_page), which is locked in __collapse_huge_page_isolate
2. putback_lru_page(src_page), which is isolated in __collapse_huge_page_isolate
3. decrease compound_nr(src_page), which is increased in
__collapse_huge_page_isolate

For compound pages, these rollback operations are done in the
list_for_each_entry_safe loop before return.
For non-compound pages, release_pte_page() does 1-3.

>
> Looks very broken. Or just hard to follow. Or both.

Do you think the logic looks correct (and just hard to follow) after
these explanation? Currently the rollback operations are soaked with
the copy_succeed code to minimize lines of code. But I can definitely
rewrite to something like this if you think the rollback logic is
correct:

if (copy_succeeded) {
  ...
} else {
  re-populate PMD;
  if (!pte_none && !zero_pfn && !PageCompound(src_page))
    release_pte_page(src_page);
  for(page in compound_list) {
    release_pte_page(page);
  }
}
return copy_succeeded;

>
> Please consider rework code more to streamline handling !copy_succeeded
> situation.
>
> > -                     /*
> > -                      * ptl mostly unnecessary, but preempt has to
> > -                      * be disabled to update the per-cpu stats
> > -                      * inside page_remove_rmap().
> > -                      */
> > -                     spin_lock(ptl);
> > -                     ptep_clear(vma->vm_mm, address, _pte);
> > -                     page_remove_rmap(src_page, vma, false);
> > -                     spin_unlock(ptl);
> > -                     free_page_and_swap_cache(src_page);
> > +                     if (copy_succeeded) {
> > +                             /*
> > +                              * pte_ptl mostly unnecessary, but preempt
> > +                              * has to be disabled to update the per-cpu
> > +                              * stats inside page_remove_rmap().
> > +                              */
> > +                             spin_lock(pte_ptl);
> > +                             ptep_clear(vma->vm_mm, _address, _pte);
> > +                             page_remove_rmap(src_page, vma, false);
> > +                             spin_unlock(pte_ptl);
> > +                             free_page_and_swap_cache(src_page);
> > +                     }
> >               }
> >       }
> >
> > @@ -723,6 +779,8 @@ static void __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte_t *pte, struct page *page,
> >               free_swap_cache(src_page);

I think in the case of !copy_succeed, doing free_swap_cache is not correct.
Changing to the new if-flow and just release_pte_page() on compound
pages should fix this.

> >               putback_lru_page(src_page);
> >       }
> > +
> > +     return copy_succeeded;
> >  }
> >
> >  static void khugepaged_alloc_sleep(void)
> > @@ -1009,6 +1067,7 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >       struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> >       struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> >       gfp_t gfp;
> > +     bool copied = false;
> >
> >       VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
> >
> > @@ -1121,9 +1180,13 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >        */
> >       anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma);
> >
> > -     __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte, new_page, vma, address, pte_ptl,
> > -                     &compound_pagelist);
> > +     copied = __collapse_huge_page_copy(pte, new_page, pmd, _pmd,
> > +                     vma, address, pte_ptl, &compound_pagelist);
> >       pte_unmap(pte);
> > +     if (!copied) {
> > +             result = SCAN_COPY_MC;
> > +             goto out_up_write;
> > +     }
> >       /*
> >        * spin_lock() below is not the equivalent of smp_wmb(), but
> >        * the smp_wmb() inside __SetPageUptodate() can be reused to
> > @@ -2129,6 +2192,13 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_slot(unsigned int pages,
> >                               khugepaged_scan_file(mm, file, pgoff, hpage);
> >                               fput(file);
> >                       } else {
> > +                             /*
> > +                              * mmap_read_lock is
> > +                              * 1) still held if scan failed;
> > +                              * 2) released if scan succeeded.
> > +                              * It is not affected by collapsing or copying
> > +                              * operations.
> > +                              */
> >                               ret = khugepaged_scan_pmd(mm, vma,
> >                                               khugepaged_scan.address,
> >                                               hpage);
> > --
> > 2.38.0.rc1.362.ged0d419d3c-goog
> >
> >
>
> --
>   Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-14 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-10 16:01 [PATCH v5 0/2] Memory poison recovery in khugepaged collapsing Jiaqi Yan
2022-10-10 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] mm/khugepaged: recover from poisoned anonymous memory Jiaqi Yan
2022-10-11 23:59   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-14 18:28     ` Jiaqi Yan [this message]
2022-10-31 15:31       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-10-10 16:01 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] mm/khugepaged: recover from poisoned file-backed memory Jiaqi Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACw3F50LHFe=DOnX+y16evogOnB-npZvPF46mgF8TCBRUVByRw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jiaqiyan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).