From: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/11] mm: Add fast_only bool to test_young and clear_young MMU notifiers
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:13:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADrL8HUmQWDc-75p=Z2KZzHkyWCCh8xnX=+ZXm5MZ-drALjKTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37ae59f2-777a-4a58-ae58-4a20066364dd@redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 2:36 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 24.07.24 03:10, James Houghton wrote:
> > For implementers, the fast_only bool indicates that the age information
> > needs to be harvested such that we do not slow down other MMU operations,
> > and ideally that we are not ourselves slowed down by other MMU
> > operations. Usually this means that the implementation should be
> > lockless.
>
> But what are the semantics if "fast_only" cannot be achieved by the
> implementer?
>
> Can we add some documentation to the new functions that explain what
> this mysterious "fast_only" is and what the expected semantics are?
> Please? :)
Thanks for pointing out the missing documentation. How's this?
diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index 45c5995ebd84..c21992036dd3 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -106,6 +106,18 @@ struct mmu_notifier_ops {
* clear_young is a lightweight version of clear_flush_young. Like the
* latter, it is supposed to test-and-clear the young/accessed bitflag
* in the secondary pte, but it may omit flushing the secondary tlb.
+ *
+ * The fast_only parameter indicates that this call should not block,
+ * and this function should not cause other MMU notifier calls to
+ * block. Usually this means that the implementation should be
+ * lockless.
+ *
+ * When called with fast_only, this notifier will be a no-op unless
+ * has_fast_aging is set on the struct mmu_notifier.
+ *
+ * When fast_only is true, if the implementer cannot determine that a
+ * range is young without blocking, it should return 0 (i.e.,
+ * that the range is NOT young).
*/
int (*clear_young)(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -118,6 +130,8 @@ struct mmu_notifier_ops {
* the secondary pte. This is used to know if the page is
* frequently used without actually clearing the flag or tearing
* down the secondary mapping on the page.
+ *
+ * The fast_only parameter has the same meaning as with clear_young.
*/
int (*test_young)(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
struct mm_struct *mm,
I've also moved the commit that follows this one (the one that adds
has_fast_aging) to be before this one so that the comment makes sense.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 1:10 [PATCH v6 00/11] mm: multi-gen LRU: Walk secondary MMU page tables while aging James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] KVM: Add lockless memslot walk to KVM James Houghton
2024-07-25 16:39 ` David Matlack
2024-07-26 0:28 ` James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] KVM: x86: Relax locking for kvm_test_age_gfn and kvm_age_gfn James Houghton
2024-07-25 18:07 ` David Matlack
2024-07-26 0:34 ` James Houghton
2024-08-17 1:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 0:35 ` James Houghton
2024-08-30 3:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 12:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-30 17:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 20:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] KVM: arm64: " James Houghton
2024-07-25 21:55 ` James Houghton
2024-08-17 0:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-17 1:03 ` Yu Zhao
2024-08-19 20:41 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-19 22:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 0:33 ` James Houghton
2024-08-30 0:48 ` Oliver Upton
2024-08-30 15:33 ` David Matlack
2024-08-30 17:38 ` Oliver Upton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] mm: Add missing mmu_notifier_clear_young for !MMU_NOTIFIER James Houghton
2024-08-01 9:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] mm: Add fast_only bool to test_young and clear_young MMU notifiers James Houghton
2024-08-01 9:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-01 23:13 ` James Houghton [this message]
2024-08-02 15:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-05 16:54 ` James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] mm: Add has_fast_aging to struct mmu_notifier James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] KVM: Pass fast_only to kvm_{test_,}age_gfn James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] KVM: x86: Optimize kvm_{test_,}age_gfn a little bit James Houghton
2024-07-25 18:17 ` David Matlack
2024-08-17 1:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-08-30 0:34 ` James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] KVM: x86: Implement fast_only versions of kvm_{test_,}age_gfn James Houghton
2024-07-25 18:24 ` David Matlack
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] mm: multi-gen LRU: Have secondary MMUs participate in aging James Houghton
2024-07-24 1:10 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add multi-gen LRU aging to access_tracking_perf_test James Houghton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADrL8HUmQWDc-75p=Z2KZzHkyWCCh8xnX=+ZXm5MZ-drALjKTA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).