linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  bp@alien8.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	 zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, nadav.amit@gmail.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com,  kernel-team@meta.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	 jackmanb@google.com, mhklinux@outlook.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,  Manali.Shukla@amd.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	 baolu.lu@intel.com, david.guckian@intel.com,
	damian.muszynski@intel.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] x86/mm: regression after 4a02ed8e1cc3
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 18:31:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez2ck2QaxZ6G1Qrp9p0brFecrnf+KRc7Uk8c9kMJqSOswg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLcQ3UCXXNcByW1O@gcabiddu-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 5:44 PM Giovanni Cabiddu
<giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:00:36PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Reduce code duplication by consolidating the decision point
> > for whether to do individual invalidations or a full flush
> > inside get_flush_tlb_info.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> > Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
> > Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
> > ---
> After 4a02ed8e1cc3 ("x86/mm: Consolidate full flush threshold
> decision"), we've seen data corruption in DMAd buffers when testing SVA.

If it's not too much effort, you could try to see whether bumping
/sys/kernel/debug/x86/tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling to some relatively
large value (maybe something like 262144, which is 512*512) causes you
to see the same kind of issue before commit 4a02ed8e1cc3. (Note that
increasing tlb_single_page_flush_ceiling costs performance, and
putting an overly big value in there will probably make the system
completely unresponsive.)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-02 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-26  3:00 [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Rik van Riel
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 01/13] x86/mm: consolidate full flush threshold decision Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 15:44   ` [BUG] x86/mm: regression after 4a02ed8e1cc3 Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-09-02 15:50     ` Dave Hansen
2025-09-02 16:08       ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-02 16:11         ` Dave Hansen
2025-09-03 14:00       ` Rik van Riel
2025-09-02 16:05     ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:13       ` Jann Horn
2025-09-03 14:18       ` Nadav Amit
2025-09-03 14:42         ` Jann Horn
2025-09-02 16:31     ` Jann Horn [this message]
2025-09-02 16:57       ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 02/13] x86/mm: get INVLPGB count max from CPUID Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 16:21   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 19:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 03/13] x86/mm: add INVLPGB support code Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-28 18:51   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 19:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 18:41     ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-03 19:23       ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:00         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:10           ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 16:19             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 16:57               ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 21:12                 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 04/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB for kernel TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:00   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-28 21:43   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 05/13] x86/mm: use INVLPGB in flush_tlb_all Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 19:18   ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-01 12:20     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-01 15:54       ` Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 22:20   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 06/13] x86/mm: use broadcast TLB flushing for page reclaim TLB flushing Rik van Riel
2025-02-28 18:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 07/13] x86/mm: add global ASID allocation helper functions Rik van Riel
2025-03-02  7:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 08/13] x86/mm: global ASID context switch & TLB flush handling Rik van Riel
2025-03-02  7:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 09/13] x86/mm: global ASID process exit helpers Rik van Riel
2025-03-02 12:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-02 13:53     ` Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:16       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 10/13] x86/mm: enable broadcast TLB invalidation for multi-threaded processes Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 10:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 11/13] x86/mm: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 11:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 21:47     ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:52       ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:24         ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 12:52       ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 14:11         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 15:33           ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-04 17:51             ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 12/13] x86/mm: enable AMD translation cache extensions Rik van Riel
2025-02-26  3:00 ` [PATCH v14 13/13] x86/mm: only invalidate final translations with INVLPGB Rik van Riel
2025-03-03 22:40   ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-04 11:53     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 12:42 ` [PATCH v14 00/13] AMD broadcast TLB invalidation Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 13:29   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:04 ` [PATCH] x86/mm: Always set the ASID valid bit for the INVLPGB instruction Borislav Petkov
2025-03-04 12:43   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAG48ez2ck2QaxZ6G1Qrp9p0brFecrnf+KRc7Uk8c9kMJqSOswg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=damian.muszynski@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.guckian@intel.com \
    --cc=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
    --cc=jackmanb@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).