From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid@gonehiking.org>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: SPARC version of arch_validate_prot() looks broken (UAF read)
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:14:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez3YsfTfOFKa-Po58e4PNp7FK54MFbkK3aUPSRt3LWtxQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
From what I can tell from looking at the code:
SPARC's arch_validate_prot() looks up the VMA and peeks at it; that's
not permitted though. do_mprotect_pkey() calls arch_validate_prot()
before taking the mmap lock, so we can hit use-after-free reads if
someone concurrently deletes a VMA we're looking at.
Additionally, arch_validate_prot() currently only accepts the start
address as a parameter, but the SPARC code probably should be checking
the entire given range, which might consist of multiple VMAs?
I'm not sure what the best fix is here; it kinda seems like what SPARC
really wants is a separate hook that is called from inside the loop in
do_mprotect_pkey() that iterates over the VMAs? So maybe commit
9035cf9a97e4 ("mm: Add address parameter to arch_validate_prot()")
should be reverted, and a separate hook should be created?
(Luckily the ordering of the vmacache operations works out such that
AFAICS, despite calling find_vma() without holding the mmap_sem, we
can never end up establishing a vmacache entry with a dangling pointer
that might be considered valid on a subsequent call. So this should be
limited to a rather boring UAF data read, and not be exploitable for a
UAF write or UAF function pointer read.)
next reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-28 12:14 Jann Horn [this message]
2020-09-29 17:30 ` SPARC version of arch_validate_prot() looks broken (UAF read) Khalid Aziz
2020-10-07 0:45 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-07 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-10-07 6:31 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAG48ez3YsfTfOFKa-Po58e4PNp7FK54MFbkK3aUPSRt3LWtxQA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anthony.yznaga@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=khalid@gonehiking.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).