* [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I)
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table Kairui Song
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
This is the first phase of the bigger series implementing basic
infrastructures for the Swap Table idea proposed at the LSF/MM/BPF
topic "Integrate swap cache, swap maps with swap allocator" [1].
To give credit where it is due, this is based on Chris Li's
idea and a prototype of using cluster size atomic arrays to
implement swap cache.
This phase I contains 15 patches, introduces the swap table infrastructure
and uses it as the swap cache backend. By doing so, we have up to ~5-20%
performance gain in throughput, RPS or build time for benchmark and
workload tests. The speed up is due to less contention on the swap
cache access and shallower swap cache lookup path. The cluster size
is much finer-grained than the 64M address space split, which is removed
in this phase I. It also unifies and cleans up the swap code base.
Each swap cluster will dynamically allocate the swap table, which is an
atomic array to cover every swap slot in the cluster. It replaces the swap
cache backed by XArray. In phase I, the static allocated swap_map still
co-exists with the swap table. The memory usage is about the same as the
original on average. A few exception test cases show about 1% higher in
memory usage. In the following phases of the series, swap_map will merge
into the swap table without additional memory allocation. It will result
in net memory reduction compared to the original swap cache.
Testing has shown that phase I has a significant performance improvement
from 8c/1G ARM machine to 48c96t/128G x86_64 servers in many practical
workloads.
The full picture with a summary can be found at [2]. An older bigger
series of 28 patches is posted at [3].
vm-scability test:
==================
Test with:
usemem --init-time -O -y -x -n 31 1G (4G memcg, PMEM as swap)
Before: After:
System time: 219.12s 158.16s (-27.82%)
Sum Throughput: 4767.13 MB/s 6128.59 MB/s (+28.55%)
Single process Throughput: 150.21 MB/s 196.52 MB/s (+30.83%)
Free latency: 175047.58 us 131411.87 us (-24.92%)
usemem --init-time -O -y -x -n 32 1536M (16G memory, global pressure,
PMEM as swap)
Before: After:
System time: 356.16s 284.68s (-20.06%)
Sum Throughput: 4648.35 MB/s 5453.52 MB/s (+17.32%)
Single process Throughput: 141.63 MB/s 168.35 MB/s (+18.86%)
Free latency: 499907.71 us 484977.03 us (-2.99%)
This shows an improvement of more than 20% improvement in most readings.
Build kernel test:
==================
The following result matrix is from building kernel with defconfig on
tmpfs with ZSWAP / ZRAM, using different memory pressure and setups.
Measuring sys and real time in seconds, less is better
(user time is almost identical as expected):
-j<NR> / Mem | Sys before / after | Real before / after
Using 16G ZRAM with memcg limit:
6 / 192M | 9686 / 9472 -2.21% | 2130 / 2096 -1.59%
12 / 256M | 6610 / 6451 -2.41% | 827 / 812 -1.81%
24 / 384M | 5938 / 5701 -3.37% | 414 / 405 -2.17%
48 / 768M | 4696 / 4409 -6.11% | 188 / 182 -3.19%
With 64k folio:
24 / 512M | 4222 / 4162 -1.42% | 326 / 321 -1.53%
48 / 1G | 3688 / 3622 -1.79% | 151 / 149 -1.32%
With ZSWAP with 3G memcg (using higher limit due to kmem account):
48 / 3G | 603 / 581 -3.65% | 81 / 80 -1.23%
Testing extremely high global memory and schedule pressure: Using ZSWAP
with 32G NVMEs in a 48c VM that has 4G memory, no memcg limit, system
components take up about 1.5G already, using make -j48 to build
defconfig:
Before: sys time: 2069.53s real time: 135.76s
After: sys time: 2021.13s (-2.34%) real time: 134.23s (-1.12%)
On another 48c 4G memory VM, using 16G ZRAM as swap, testing make
-j48 with same config:
Before: sys time: 1756.96s real time: 111.01s
After: sys time: 1715.90s (-2.34%) real time: 109.51s (-1.35%)
All cases are more or less faster, and no regression even under
extremely heavy global memory pressure.
Redis / Valkey bench:
=====================
The test machine is a ARM64 VM with 1536M memory 12 cores, Redis
is set to use 2500M memory, and ZRAM swap size is set to 5G:
Testing with:
redis-benchmark -r 2000000 -n 2000000 -d 1024 -c 12 -P 32 -t get
no BGSAVE with BGSAVE
Before: 487576.06 RPS 280016.02 RPS
After: 487541.76 RPS (-0.01%) 300155.32 RPS (+7.19%)
Testing with:
redis-benchmark -r 2500000 -n 2500000 -d 1024 -c 12 -P 32 -t get
no BGSAVE with BGSAVE
Before: 466789.59 RPS 281213.92 RPS
After: 466402.89 RPS (-0.08%) 298411.84 RPS (+6.12%)
With BGSAVE enabled, most Redis memory will have a swap count > 1 so
swap cache is heavily in use. We can see a about 6% performance gain.
No BGSAVE is very slightly slower (<0.1%) due to the higher memory
pressure of the co-existence of swap_map and swap table. This will be
optimzed into a net gain and up to 20% gain in BGSAVE case in the
following phases.
HDD swap is also ~40% faster with usemem because we removed an old
contention workaround.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/CAMgjq7BvQ0ZXvyLGp2YP96+i+6COCBBJCYmjXHGBnfisCAb8VA@mail.gmail.com [1]
Link: https://github.com/ryncsn/linux/tree/kasong/devel/swap-table [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250514201729.48420-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/ [3]
Suggested-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
---
V4 changes:
- Patch 14: fix potential cluster leak when attemp a sleep allocation of
swap table: Just remove the logic that check and return the percpu
cluster, it was trying to avoid fragmentation, which wasn't very
successfully and may not work at all if there are multiple devices.
The fragmentation is not a serious issue and given the chance of
hitting that race is extremely low, let's just ignore that [ Chris Meson ].
- Patch 8 & 9: move some changes from Patch 9 to Patch 8 to avoid build
error, no code change. [ Baolin Wang ]
- Patch 9: Fix locking section issue, should protect the shmem statistic
update with spin lock irq. Also fix an warn on condition.
Link to V3:
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250910160833.3464-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/
V3 changes:
There is basically no code change, mostly clean up and comment changes.
- Renames a few variable and functions [ David Hildenbrand, Chris Li ]
- Move the folio_matches_swap_entry check under unuse_pte in patch 5
[ David Hildenbrand ].
- Remove two redundant function params for the folio replace helper in
patch 10, and add comment about folio setup [ David Hildenbrand ].
- Move the shmem clean up patch after the API rename patch to fix build
error, no code change. [ Baolin Wang ]
- Fix build error with !SWAP and !SHMEM config. [ Klara Modin, SeongJae Park ]
- Fix a few typo and blank lines [ David Hildenbrand ]
- Minor code style change [ Chris Li ].
- Fix documentation warning from bot. [ Chris Li ]
Link to V2:
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250905191357.78298-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/
V2 main updates:
- Added some more non-debug atomic sanity checks, which very slightly
slow down the performance by a bit compared to V1 for some tests. But
let's be more cautious in phase I, in case there is any hidden bug in
swap, since it has a rather complex historical baggage. And phase I is
a critical step for follow up swap table series [ Chris Li ].
These sanity checks can be removed very easily later or wrapped with
a DEBUG_VM_SWAP as more swap table features land in.
- The code is basically same as V1, except one missing shmem statistic
fixed thanks to [ Baolin Wang ]
- Added a lot of kernel docs, and more constify of sturct folio
arguments, and better function names, thanks to [ David Hildenbrand ]
and [ Chris Li ].
- Removed the arguable readahead change thanks to [ Chris Li ].
- Add an IRQ sanity check, have been testing with this check on for a
long time but forgot to include it in V1.
Other updates:
- One VM_WARN_ON_ONCE to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO and minor adjust [ Barry Song ]
- Split out 4 patches from the old patches. The end result is still
the same but should be easier to review [ Chris Li, David Hildenbrand ]
- Avoid some trivial blank line or variable name changes and comment fix
[ Baoquan He, Chris Li, David Hildenbrand ]
- Added HDD test benchmark result [ Chris Li ]
- Rename and simplified folio_matches_swap_entry a little bit.
Link to V1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250822192023.13477-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/
Chris Li (1):
docs/mm: add document for swap table
Kairui Song (14):
mm, swap: use unified helper for swap cache look up
mm, swap: fix swap cache index error when retrying reclaim
mm, swap: check page poison flag after locking it
mm, swap: always lock and check the swap cache folio before use
mm, swap: rename and move some swap cluster definition and helpers
mm, swap: tidy up swap device and cluster info helpers
mm, swap: cleanup swap cache API and add kerneldoc
mm/shmem, swap: remove redundant error handling for replacing folio
mm, swap: wrap swap cache replacement with a helper
mm, swap: use the swap table for the swap cache and switch API
mm, swap: mark swap address space ro and add context debug check
mm, swap: remove contention workaround for swap cache
mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table
mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits
Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst | 72 +++++
MAINTAINERS | 2 +
include/linux/swap.h | 42 ---
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
mm/huge_memory.c | 15 +-
mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 27 +-
mm/migrate.c | 28 +-
mm/mincore.c | 3 +-
mm/page_io.c | 12 +-
mm/shmem.c | 59 ++---
mm/swap.h | 311 +++++++++++++++++++---
mm/swap_state.c | 450 ++++++++++++++++---------------
mm/swap_table.h | 130 +++++++++
mm/swapfile.c | 451 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
mm/userfaultfd.c | 5 +-
mm/vmscan.c | 20 +-
mm/zswap.c | 9 +-
19 files changed, 1106 insertions(+), 535 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
create mode 100644 mm/swap_table.h
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 21:59 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 16:14 ` SeongJae Park
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mm, swap: use unified helper for swap cache look up Kairui Song
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 2 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Swap table is the new swap cache.
Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
---
Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 +
Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
index fb45acba16ac..828ad9b019b3 100644
--- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose.
page_table_check
remap_file_pages
split_page_table_lock
+ swap-table
transhuge
unevictable-lru
vmalloced-kernel-stacks
diff --git a/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..acae6ceb4f7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+:Author: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
+
+==========
+Swap Table
+==========
+
+Swap table implements swap cache as a per-cluster swap cache value array.
+
+Swap Entry
+----------
+
+A swap entry contains the information required to serve the anonymous page
+fault.
+
+Swap entry is encoded as two parts: swap type and swap offset.
+
+The swap type indicates which swap device to use.
+The swap offset is the offset of the swap file to read the page data from.
+
+Swap Cache
+----------
+
+Swap cache is a map to look up folios using swap entry as the key. The result
+value can have three possible types depending on which stage of this swap entry
+was in.
+
+1. NULL: This swap entry is not used.
+
+2. folio: A folio has been allocated and bound to this swap entry. This is
+ the transient state of swap out or swap in. The folio data can be in
+ the folio or swap file, or both.
+
+3. shadow: The shadow contains the working set information of the swapped
+ out folio. This is the normal state for a swapped out page.
+
+Swap Table Internals
+--------------------
+
+The previous swap cache is implemented by XArray. The XArray is a tree
+structure. Each lookup will go through multiple nodes. Can we do better?
+
+Notice that most of the time when we look up the swap cache, we are either
+in a swap in or swap out path. We should already have the swap cluster,
+which contains the swap entry.
+
+If we have a per-cluster array to store swap cache value in the cluster.
+Swap cache lookup within the cluster can be a very simple array lookup.
+
+We give such a per-cluster swap cache value array a name: the swap table.
+
+Each swap cluster contains 512 entries, so a swap table stores one cluster
+worth of swap cache values, which is exactly one page. This is not
+coincidental because the cluster size is determined by the huge page size.
+The swap table is holding an array of pointers. The pointer has the same
+size as the PTE. The size of the swap table should match to the second
+last level of the page table page, exactly one page.
+
+With swap table, swap cache lookup can achieve great locality, simpler,
+and faster.
+
+Locking
+-------
+
+Swap table modification requires taking the cluster lock. If a folio
+is being added to or removed from the swap table, the folio must be
+locked prior to the cluster lock. After adding or removing is done, the
+folio shall be unlocked.
+
+Swap table lookup is protected by RCU and atomic read. If the lookup
+returns a folio, the user must lock the folio before use.
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 68d29f0220fc..3d113bfc3c82 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -16225,6 +16225,7 @@ R: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
R: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
L: linux-mm@kvack.org
S: Maintained
+F: Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
F: include/linux/swap.h
F: include/linux/swapfile.h
F: include/linux/swapops.h
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 02/15] mm, swap: use unified helper for swap cache look up
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] mm, swap: fix swap cache index error when retrying reclaim Kairui Song
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
The swap cache lookup helper swap_cache_get_folio currently does
readahead updates as well, so callers that are not doing swapin from any
VMA or mapping are forced to reuse filemap helpers instead, and have to
access the swap cache space directly.
So decouple readahead update with swap cache lookup. Move the readahead
update part into a standalone helper. Let the caller call the readahead
update helper if they do readahead. And convert all swap cache lookups
to use swap_cache_get_folio.
After this commit, there are only three special cases for accessing swap
cache space now: huge memory splitting, migration, and shmem replacing,
because they need to lock the XArray. The following commits will wrap
their accesses to the swap cache too, with special helpers.
And worth noting, currently dropbehind is not supported for anon folio,
and we will never see a dropbehind folio in swap cache. The unified
helper can be updated later to handle that.
While at it, add proper kernedoc for touched helpers.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 6 ++-
mm/mincore.c | 3 +-
mm/shmem.c | 4 +-
mm/swap.h | 13 ++++--
mm/swap_state.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
mm/swapfile.c | 11 +++--
mm/userfaultfd.c | 5 +--
7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index d9de6c056179..10ef528a5f44 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4660,9 +4660,11 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (unlikely(!si))
goto out;
- folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry, vma, vmf->address);
- if (folio)
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
+ if (folio) {
+ swap_update_readahead(folio, vma, vmf->address);
page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
+ }
swapcache = folio;
if (!folio) {
diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
index 2f3e1816a30d..8ec4719370e1 100644
--- a/mm/mincore.c
+++ b/mm/mincore.c
@@ -76,8 +76,7 @@ static unsigned char mincore_swap(swp_entry_t entry, bool shmem)
if (!si)
return 0;
}
- folio = filemap_get_entry(swap_address_space(entry),
- swap_cache_index(entry));
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
if (shmem)
put_swap_device(si);
/* The swap cache space contains either folio, shadow or NULL */
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 29e1eb690125..410f27bc4752 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
}
/* Look it up and read it in.. */
- folio = swap_cache_get_folio(swap, NULL, 0);
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(swap);
if (!folio) {
if (data_race(si->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO)) {
/* Direct swapin skipping swap cache & readahead */
@@ -2342,6 +2342,8 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
count_vm_event(PGMAJFAULT);
count_memcg_event_mm(fault_mm, PGMAJFAULT);
}
+ } else {
+ swap_update_readahead(folio, NULL, 0);
}
if (order > folio_order(folio)) {
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index 1ae44d4193b1..efb6d7ff9f30 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -62,8 +62,7 @@ void delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio);
void clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(int type, unsigned long begin,
unsigned long end);
void swapcache_clear(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry, int nr);
-struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry,
- struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr);
+struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
struct folio *read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
struct swap_iocb **plug);
@@ -74,6 +73,8 @@ struct folio *swap_cluster_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t flag,
struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx);
struct folio *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t flag,
struct vm_fault *vmf);
+void swap_update_readahead(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr);
static inline unsigned int folio_swap_flags(struct folio *folio)
{
@@ -159,6 +160,11 @@ static inline struct folio *swapin_readahead(swp_entry_t swp, gfp_t gfp_mask,
return NULL;
}
+static inline void swap_update_readahead(struct folio *folio,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
+{
+}
+
static inline int swap_writeout(struct folio *folio,
struct swap_iocb **swap_plug)
{
@@ -169,8 +175,7 @@ static inline void swapcache_clear(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entr
{
}
-static inline struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry,
- struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
+static inline struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
{
return NULL;
}
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 99513b74b5d8..68ec531d0f2b 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -69,6 +69,27 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
printk("Total swap = %lukB\n", K(total_swap_pages));
}
+/**
+ * swap_cache_get_folio - Looks up a folio in the swap cache.
+ * @entry: swap entry used for the lookup.
+ *
+ * A found folio will be returned unlocked and with its refcount increased.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure @entry is valid and protect the swap device
+ * with reference count or locks.
+ * Return: Returns the found folio on success, NULL otherwise. The caller
+ * must lock and check if the folio still matches the swap entry before
+ * use.
+ */
+struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ struct folio *folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry),
+ swap_cache_index(entry));
+ if (IS_ERR(folio))
+ return NULL;
+ return folio;
+}
+
void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
{
struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
@@ -272,55 +293,43 @@ static inline bool swap_use_vma_readahead(void)
return READ_ONCE(enable_vma_readahead) && !atomic_read(&nr_rotate_swap);
}
-/*
- * Lookup a swap entry in the swap cache. A found folio will be returned
- * unlocked and with its refcount incremented - we rely on the kernel
- * lock getting page table operations atomic even if we drop the folio
- * lock before returning.
- *
- * Caller must lock the swap device or hold a reference to keep it valid.
+/**
+ * swap_update_readahead - Update the readahead statistics of VMA or globally.
+ * @folio: the swap cache folio that just got hit.
+ * @vma: the VMA that should be updated, could be NULL for global update.
+ * @addr: the addr that triggered the swapin, ignored if @vma is NULL.
*/
-struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry,
- struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
+void swap_update_readahead(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr)
{
- struct folio *folio;
-
- folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), swap_cache_index(entry));
- if (!IS_ERR(folio)) {
- bool vma_ra = swap_use_vma_readahead();
- bool readahead;
+ bool readahead, vma_ra = swap_use_vma_readahead();
- /*
- * At the moment, we don't support PG_readahead for anon THP
- * so let's bail out rather than confusing the readahead stat.
- */
- if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio)))
- return folio;
-
- readahead = folio_test_clear_readahead(folio);
- if (vma && vma_ra) {
- unsigned long ra_val;
- int win, hits;
-
- ra_val = GET_SWAP_RA_VAL(vma);
- win = SWAP_RA_WIN(ra_val);
- hits = SWAP_RA_HITS(ra_val);
- if (readahead)
- hits = min_t(int, hits + 1, SWAP_RA_HITS_MAX);
- atomic_long_set(&vma->swap_readahead_info,
- SWAP_RA_VAL(addr, win, hits));
- }
-
- if (readahead) {
- count_vm_event(SWAP_RA_HIT);
- if (!vma || !vma_ra)
- atomic_inc(&swapin_readahead_hits);
- }
- } else {
- folio = NULL;
+ /*
+ * At the moment, we don't support PG_readahead for anon THP
+ * so let's bail out rather than confusing the readahead stat.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(folio_test_large(folio)))
+ return;
+
+ readahead = folio_test_clear_readahead(folio);
+ if (vma && vma_ra) {
+ unsigned long ra_val;
+ int win, hits;
+
+ ra_val = GET_SWAP_RA_VAL(vma);
+ win = SWAP_RA_WIN(ra_val);
+ hits = SWAP_RA_HITS(ra_val);
+ if (readahead)
+ hits = min_t(int, hits + 1, SWAP_RA_HITS_MAX);
+ atomic_long_set(&vma->swap_readahead_info,
+ SWAP_RA_VAL(addr, win, hits));
}
- return folio;
+ if (readahead) {
+ count_vm_event(SWAP_RA_HIT);
+ if (!vma || !vma_ra)
+ atomic_inc(&swapin_readahead_hits);
+ }
}
struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
@@ -336,14 +345,10 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
*new_page_allocated = false;
for (;;) {
int err;
- /*
- * First check the swap cache. Since this is normally
- * called after swap_cache_get_folio() failed, re-calling
- * that would confuse statistics.
- */
- folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry),
- swap_cache_index(entry));
- if (!IS_ERR(folio))
+
+ /* Check the swap cache in case the folio is already there */
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
+ if (folio)
goto got_folio;
/*
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index a7ffabbe65ef..4b8ab2cb49ca 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -213,15 +213,14 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned long offset, unsigned long flags)
{
swp_entry_t entry = swp_entry(si->type, offset);
- struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
struct folio *folio;
int ret, nr_pages;
bool need_reclaim;
again:
- folio = filemap_get_folio(address_space, swap_cache_index(entry));
- if (IS_ERR(folio))
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
+ if (!folio)
return 0;
nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -2131,7 +2130,7 @@ static int unuse_pte_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
pte_unmap(pte);
pte = NULL;
- folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry, vma, addr);
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
if (!folio) {
struct vm_fault vmf = {
.vma = vma,
@@ -2357,8 +2356,8 @@ static int try_to_unuse(unsigned int type)
(i = find_next_to_unuse(si, i)) != 0) {
entry = swp_entry(type, i);
- folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), swap_cache_index(entry));
- if (IS_ERR(folio))
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
+ if (!folio)
continue;
/*
diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
index 50aaa8dcd24c..af61b95c89e4 100644
--- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1489,9 +1489,8 @@ static long move_pages_ptes(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *dst_pmd, pmd_t *src_pmd
* separately to allow proper handling.
*/
if (!src_folio)
- folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry),
- swap_cache_index(entry));
- if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(folio)) {
+ folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
+ if (folio) {
if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
ret = -EBUSY;
folio_put(folio);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 03/15] mm, swap: fix swap cache index error when retrying reclaim
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mm, swap: use unified helper for swap cache look up Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] mm, swap: check page poison flag after locking it Kairui Song
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
The allocator will reclaim cached slots while scanning. Currently, it
will try again if reclaim found a folio that is already removed from
the swap cache due to a race. But the following lookup will be using the
wrong index. It won't cause any OOB issue since the swap cache index is
truncated upon lookup, but it may lead to reclaiming of an irrelevant
folio.
This should not cause a measurable issue, but we should fix it.
Fixes: fae8595505313 ("mm, swap: avoid reclaiming irrelevant swap cache")
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 4b8ab2cb49ca..4baebd8b48f4 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static bool swap_is_last_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned long offset, unsigned long flags)
{
- swp_entry_t entry = swp_entry(si->type, offset);
+ const swp_entry_t entry = swp_entry(si->type, offset);
struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
struct folio *folio;
int ret, nr_pages;
@@ -240,13 +240,13 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
* Offset could point to the middle of a large folio, or folio
* may no longer point to the expected offset before it's locked.
*/
- entry = folio->swap;
- if (offset < swp_offset(entry) || offset >= swp_offset(entry) + nr_pages) {
+ if (offset < swp_offset(folio->swap) ||
+ offset >= swp_offset(folio->swap) + nr_pages) {
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
goto again;
}
- offset = swp_offset(entry);
+ offset = swp_offset(folio->swap);
need_reclaim = ((flags & TTRS_ANYWAY) ||
((flags & TTRS_UNMAPPED) && !folio_mapped(folio)) ||
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 04/15] mm, swap: check page poison flag after locking it
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] mm, swap: fix swap cache index error when retrying reclaim Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] mm, swap: always lock and check the swap cache folio before use Kairui Song
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Instead of checking the poison flag only in the fast swap cache lookup
path, always check the poison flags after locking a swap cache folio.
There are two reasons to do so.
The folio is unstable and could be removed from the swap cache anytime,
so it's totally possible that the folio is no longer the backing folio
of a swap entry, and could be an irrelevant poisoned folio. We might
mistakenly kill a faulting process.
And it's totally possible or even common for the slow swap in path
(swapin_readahead) to bring in a cached folio. The cache folio could be
poisoned, too. Only checking the poison flag in the fast path will miss
such folios.
The race window is tiny, so it's very unlikely to happen, though.
While at it, also add a unlikely prefix.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 10ef528a5f44..94a5928e8ace 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4661,10 +4661,8 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
goto out;
folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
- if (folio) {
+ if (folio)
swap_update_readahead(folio, vma, vmf->address);
- page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
- }
swapcache = folio;
if (!folio) {
@@ -4735,20 +4733,13 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
ret = VM_FAULT_MAJOR;
count_vm_event(PGMAJFAULT);
count_memcg_event_mm(vma->vm_mm, PGMAJFAULT);
- page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
- } else if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
- /*
- * hwpoisoned dirty swapcache pages are kept for killing
- * owner processes (which may be unknown at hwpoison time)
- */
- ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
- goto out_release;
}
ret |= folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vmf);
if (ret & VM_FAULT_RETRY)
goto out_release;
+ page = folio_file_page(folio, swp_offset(entry));
if (swapcache) {
/*
* Make sure folio_free_swap() or swapoff did not release the
@@ -4761,6 +4752,15 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
page_swap_entry(page).val != entry.val))
goto out_page;
+ if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page))) {
+ /*
+ * hwpoisoned dirty swapcache pages are kept for killing
+ * owner processes (which may be unknown at hwpoison time)
+ */
+ ret = VM_FAULT_HWPOISON;
+ goto out_page;
+ }
+
/*
* KSM sometimes has to copy on read faults, for example, if
* folio->index of non-ksm folios would be nonlinear inside the
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 05/15] mm, swap: always lock and check the swap cache folio before use
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] mm, swap: check page poison flag after locking it Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-17 23:54 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] mm, swap: rename and move some swap cluster definition and helpers Kairui Song
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Swap cache lookup only increases the reference count of the returned
folio. That's not enough to ensure a folio is stable in the swap
cache, so the folio could be removed from the swap cache at any
time. The caller should always lock and check the folio before using it.
We have just documented this in kerneldoc, now introduce a helper for swap
cache folio verification with proper sanity checks.
Also, sanitize a few current users to use this convention and the new
helper for easier debugging. They were not having observable problems
yet, only trivial issues like wasted CPU cycles on swapoff or
reclaiming. They would fail in some other way, but it is still better to
always follow this convention to make things robust and make later
commits easier to do.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
---
mm/memory.c | 3 +--
mm/swap.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/swap_state.c | 7 +++++--
mm/swapfile.c | 10 ++++++++--
4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 94a5928e8ace..5808c4ef21b3 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4748,8 +4748,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
* swapcache, we need to check that the page's swap has not
* changed.
*/
- if (unlikely(!folio_test_swapcache(folio) ||
- page_swap_entry(page).val != entry.val))
+ if (unlikely(!folio_matches_swap_entry(folio, entry)))
goto out_page;
if (unlikely(PageHWPoison(page))) {
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index efb6d7ff9f30..7d868f8de696 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -52,6 +52,28 @@ static inline pgoff_t swap_cache_index(swp_entry_t entry)
return swp_offset(entry) & SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK;
}
+/**
+ * folio_matches_swap_entry - Check if a folio matches a given swap entry.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ * @entry: The swap entry to check against.
+ *
+ * Context: The caller should have the folio locked to ensure it's stable
+ * and nothing will move it in or out of the swap cache.
+ * Return: true or false.
+ */
+static inline bool folio_matches_swap_entry(const struct folio *folio,
+ swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ swp_entry_t folio_entry = folio->swap;
+ long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+ if (!folio_test_swapcache(folio))
+ return false;
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!IS_ALIGNED(folio_entry.val, nr_pages), folio);
+ return folio_entry.val == round_down(entry.val, nr_pages);
+}
+
void show_swap_cache_info(void);
void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry);
int add_to_swap_cache(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
@@ -144,6 +166,11 @@ static inline pgoff_t swap_cache_index(swp_entry_t entry)
return 0;
}
+static inline bool folio_matches_swap_entry(const struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline void show_swap_cache_info(void)
{
}
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 68ec531d0f2b..9225d6b695ad 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
* with reference count or locks.
* Return: Returns the found folio on success, NULL otherwise. The caller
* must lock and check if the folio still matches the swap entry before
- * use.
+ * use (e.g. with folio_matches_swap_entry).
*/
struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
{
@@ -346,7 +346,10 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
for (;;) {
int err;
- /* Check the swap cache in case the folio is already there */
+ /*
+ * Check the swap cache first, if a cached folio is found,
+ * return it unlocked. The caller will lock and check it.
+ */
folio = swap_cache_get_folio(entry);
if (folio)
goto got_folio;
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 4baebd8b48f4..c3c3364cb42e 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -240,8 +240,7 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
* Offset could point to the middle of a large folio, or folio
* may no longer point to the expected offset before it's locked.
*/
- if (offset < swp_offset(folio->swap) ||
- offset >= swp_offset(folio->swap) + nr_pages) {
+ if (!folio_matches_swap_entry(folio, entry)) {
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
goto again;
@@ -2004,6 +2003,13 @@ static int unuse_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
bool hwpoisoned = false;
int ret = 1;
+ /*
+ * If the folio is removed from swap cache by others, continue to
+ * unuse other PTEs. try_to_unuse may try again if we missed this one.
+ */
+ if (!folio_matches_swap_entry(folio, entry))
+ return 0;
+
swapcache = folio;
folio = ksm_might_need_to_copy(folio, vma, addr);
if (unlikely(!folio))
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 06/15] mm, swap: rename and move some swap cluster definition and helpers
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] mm, swap: always lock and check the swap cache folio before use Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-19 22:02 ` Nhat Pham
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] mm, swap: tidy up swap device and cluster info helpers Kairui Song
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
No feature change, move cluster related definitions and helpers to
mm/swap.h, also tidy up and add a "swap_" prefix for cluster lock/unlock
helpers, so they can be used outside of swap files. And while at it, add
kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 34 ----------------
mm/swap.h | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/swapfile.c | 97 +++++++++++++-------------------------------
3 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index a2bb20841616..78cc48a65512 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -235,40 +235,6 @@ enum {
/* Special value in each swap_map continuation */
#define SWAP_CONT_MAX 0x7f /* Max count */
-/*
- * We use this to track usage of a cluster. A cluster is a block of swap disk
- * space with SWAPFILE_CLUSTER pages long and naturally aligns in disk. All
- * free clusters are organized into a list. We fetch an entry from the list to
- * get a free cluster.
- *
- * The flags field determines if a cluster is free. This is
- * protected by cluster lock.
- */
-struct swap_cluster_info {
- spinlock_t lock; /*
- * Protect swap_cluster_info fields
- * other than list, and swap_info_struct->swap_map
- * elements corresponding to the swap cluster.
- */
- u16 count;
- u8 flags;
- u8 order;
- struct list_head list;
-};
-
-/* All on-list cluster must have a non-zero flag. */
-enum swap_cluster_flags {
- CLUSTER_FLAG_NONE = 0, /* For temporary off-list cluster */
- CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE,
- CLUSTER_FLAG_NONFULL,
- CLUSTER_FLAG_FRAG,
- /* Clusters with flags above are allocatable */
- CLUSTER_FLAG_USABLE = CLUSTER_FLAG_FRAG,
- CLUSTER_FLAG_FULL,
- CLUSTER_FLAG_DISCARD,
- CLUSTER_FLAG_MAX,
-};
-
/*
* The first page in the swap file is the swap header, which is always marked
* bad to prevent it from being allocated as an entry. This also prevents the
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index 7d868f8de696..138b5197c35e 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -7,10 +7,80 @@ struct swap_iocb;
extern int page_cluster;
+#ifdef CONFIG_THP_SWAP
+#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER HPAGE_PMD_NR
+#define swap_entry_order(order) (order)
+#else
+#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 256
+#define swap_entry_order(order) 0
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * We use this to track usage of a cluster. A cluster is a block of swap disk
+ * space with SWAPFILE_CLUSTER pages long and naturally aligns in disk. All
+ * free clusters are organized into a list. We fetch an entry from the list to
+ * get a free cluster.
+ *
+ * The flags field determines if a cluster is free. This is
+ * protected by cluster lock.
+ */
+struct swap_cluster_info {
+ spinlock_t lock; /*
+ * Protect swap_cluster_info fields
+ * other than list, and swap_info_struct->swap_map
+ * elements corresponding to the swap cluster.
+ */
+ u16 count;
+ u8 flags;
+ u8 order;
+ struct list_head list;
+};
+
+/* All on-list cluster must have a non-zero flag. */
+enum swap_cluster_flags {
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_NONE = 0, /* For temporary off-list cluster */
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE,
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_NONFULL,
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_FRAG,
+ /* Clusters with flags above are allocatable */
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_USABLE = CLUSTER_FLAG_FRAG,
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_FULL,
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_DISCARD,
+ CLUSTER_FLAG_MAX,
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
#include <linux/swapops.h> /* for swp_offset */
#include <linux/blk_types.h> /* for bio_end_io_t */
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swp_offset_cluster(
+ struct swap_info_struct *si, pgoff_t offset)
+{
+ return &si->cluster_info[offset / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER];
+}
+
+/**
+ * swap_cluster_lock - Lock and return the swap cluster of given offset.
+ * @si: swap device the cluster belongs to.
+ * @offset: the swap entry offset, pointing to a valid slot.
+ *
+ * Context: The caller must ensure the offset is in the valid range and
+ * protect the swap device with reference count or locks.
+ */
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_lock(
+ struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset)
+{
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = swp_offset_cluster(si, offset);
+
+ spin_lock(&ci->lock);
+ return ci;
+}
+
+static inline void swap_cluster_unlock(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+{
+ spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
+}
+
/* linux/mm/page_io.c */
int sio_pool_init(void);
struct swap_iocb;
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index c3c3364cb42e..700e07cb1cbd 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
static void swap_range_alloc(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned int nr_entries);
static bool folio_swapcache_freeable(struct folio *folio);
-static struct swap_cluster_info *lock_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
- unsigned long offset);
-static inline void unlock_cluster(struct swap_cluster_info *ci);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_lock);
static unsigned int nr_swapfiles;
@@ -258,9 +255,9 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
* swap_map is HAS_CACHE only, which means the slots have no page table
* reference or pending writeback, and can't be allocated to others.
*/
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
need_reclaim = swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, nr_pages);
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
if (!need_reclaim)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -385,19 +382,6 @@ static void discard_swap_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_THP_SWAP
-#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER HPAGE_PMD_NR
-
-#define swap_entry_order(order) (order)
-#else
-#define SWAPFILE_CLUSTER 256
-
-/*
- * Define swap_entry_order() as constant to let compiler to optimize
- * out some code if !CONFIG_THP_SWAP
- */
-#define swap_entry_order(order) 0
-#endif
#define LATENCY_LIMIT 256
static inline bool cluster_is_empty(struct swap_cluster_info *info)
@@ -425,34 +409,12 @@ static inline unsigned int cluster_index(struct swap_info_struct *si,
return ci - si->cluster_info;
}
-static inline struct swap_cluster_info *offset_to_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
- unsigned long offset)
-{
- return &si->cluster_info[offset / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER];
-}
-
static inline unsigned int cluster_offset(struct swap_info_struct *si,
struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
{
return cluster_index(si, ci) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
}
-static inline struct swap_cluster_info *lock_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
- unsigned long offset)
-{
- struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
-
- ci = offset_to_cluster(si, offset);
- spin_lock(&ci->lock);
-
- return ci;
-}
-
-static inline void unlock_cluster(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
-{
- spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
-}
-
static void move_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
struct swap_cluster_info *ci, struct list_head *list,
enum swap_cluster_flags new_flags)
@@ -808,7 +770,7 @@ static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
}
out:
relocate_cluster(si, ci);
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
if (si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE) {
this_cpu_write(percpu_swap_cluster.offset[order], next);
this_cpu_write(percpu_swap_cluster.si[order], si);
@@ -875,7 +837,7 @@ static void swap_reclaim_full_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si, bool force)
if (ci->flags == CLUSTER_FLAG_NONE)
relocate_cluster(si, ci);
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
if (to_scan <= 0)
break;
}
@@ -914,7 +876,7 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
if (offset == SWAP_ENTRY_INVALID)
goto new_cluster;
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
/* Cluster could have been used by another order */
if (cluster_is_usable(ci, order)) {
if (cluster_is_empty(ci))
@@ -922,7 +884,7 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
found = alloc_swap_scan_cluster(si, ci, offset,
order, usage);
} else {
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
}
if (found)
goto done;
@@ -1203,7 +1165,7 @@ static bool swap_alloc_fast(swp_entry_t *entry,
if (!si || !offset || !get_swap_device_info(si))
return false;
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
if (cluster_is_usable(ci, order)) {
if (cluster_is_empty(ci))
offset = cluster_offset(si, ci);
@@ -1211,7 +1173,7 @@ static bool swap_alloc_fast(swp_entry_t *entry,
if (found)
*entry = swp_entry(si->type, found);
} else {
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
}
put_swap_device(si);
@@ -1479,14 +1441,14 @@ static void swap_entries_put_cache(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned long offset = swp_offset(entry);
struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
- if (swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, nr))
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
+ if (swap_only_has_cache(si, offset, nr)) {
swap_entries_free(si, ci, entry, nr);
- else {
+ } else {
for (int i = 0; i < nr; i++, entry.val++)
swap_entry_put_locked(si, ci, entry, SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
}
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
}
static bool swap_entries_put_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
@@ -1504,7 +1466,7 @@ static bool swap_entries_put_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
if (count != 1 && count != SWAP_MAP_SHMEM)
goto fallback;
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
if (!swap_is_last_map(si, offset, nr, &has_cache)) {
goto locked_fallback;
}
@@ -1513,21 +1475,20 @@ static bool swap_entries_put_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
else
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
WRITE_ONCE(si->swap_map[offset + i], SWAP_HAS_CACHE);
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
return has_cache;
fallback:
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
locked_fallback:
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++, entry.val++) {
count = swap_entry_put_locked(si, ci, entry, 1);
if (count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE)
has_cache = true;
}
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
return has_cache;
-
}
/*
@@ -1577,7 +1538,7 @@ static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned char *map_end = map + nr_pages;
/* It should never free entries across different clusters */
- VM_BUG_ON(ci != offset_to_cluster(si, offset + nr_pages - 1));
+ VM_BUG_ON(ci != swp_offset_cluster(si, offset + nr_pages - 1));
VM_BUG_ON(cluster_is_empty(ci));
VM_BUG_ON(ci->count < nr_pages);
@@ -1652,9 +1613,9 @@ bool swap_entry_swapped(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry)
struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
int count;
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
count = swap_count(si->swap_map[offset]);
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
return !!count;
}
@@ -1677,7 +1638,7 @@ int swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry)
offset = swp_offset(entry);
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
count = swap_count(si->swap_map[offset]);
if (!(count & COUNT_CONTINUED))
@@ -1700,7 +1661,7 @@ int swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry)
n *= (SWAP_CONT_MAX + 1);
} while (tmp_count & COUNT_CONTINUED);
out:
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
return count;
}
@@ -1715,7 +1676,7 @@ static bool swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(struct swap_info_struct *si,
int i;
bool ret = false;
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
if (nr_pages == 1) {
if (swap_count(map[roffset]))
ret = true;
@@ -1728,7 +1689,7 @@ static bool swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(struct swap_info_struct *si,
}
}
unlock_out:
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
return ret;
}
@@ -2662,8 +2623,8 @@ static void wait_for_allocation(struct swap_info_struct *si)
BUG_ON(si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK);
for (offset = 0; offset < end; offset += SWAPFILE_CLUSTER) {
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
}
}
@@ -3579,7 +3540,7 @@ static int __swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned char usage, int nr)
offset = swp_offset(entry);
VM_WARN_ON(nr > SWAPFILE_CLUSTER - offset % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
VM_WARN_ON(usage == 1 && nr > 1);
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
err = 0;
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
@@ -3634,7 +3595,7 @@ static int __swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned char usage, int nr)
}
unlock_out:
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
return err;
}
@@ -3733,7 +3694,7 @@ int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask)
offset = swp_offset(entry);
- ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(si, offset);
count = swap_count(si->swap_map[offset]);
@@ -3793,7 +3754,7 @@ int add_swap_count_continuation(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask)
out_unlock_cont:
spin_unlock(&si->cont_lock);
out:
- unlock_cluster(ci);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
put_swap_device(si);
outer:
if (page)
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 07/15] mm, swap: tidy up swap device and cluster info helpers
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] mm, swap: rename and move some swap cluster definition and helpers Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] mm, swap: cleanup swap cache API and add kerneldoc Kairui Song
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
swp_swap_info is the most commonly used helper for retrieving swap info.
It has an internal check that may lead to a NULL return value, but
almost none of its caller checks the return value, making the internal
check pointless. In fact, most of these callers already ensured the
entry is valid and never expect a NULL value.
Tidy this up and improve the function names. If the caller can make sure
the swap entry/type is valid and the device is pinned, use the new
introduced __swap_entry_to_info/__swap_type_to_info instead. They have
more debug sanity checks and lower overhead as they are inlined.
Callers that may expect a NULL value should use
swap_entry_to_info/swap_type_to_info instead.
No feature change. The rearranged codes should have had no effect, or
they should have been hitting NULL de-ref bugs already. Only some new
sanity checks are added so potential issues may show up in debug build.
The new helpers will be frequently used with swap table later when working
with swap cache folios. A locked swap cache folio ensures the entries are
valid and stable so these helpers are very helpful.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/swap.h | 6 ------
mm/page_io.c | 12 ++++++------
mm/swap.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
mm/swap_state.c | 4 ++--
mm/swapfile.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 78cc48a65512..762f8db0e811 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -479,7 +479,6 @@ extern sector_t swapdev_block(int, pgoff_t);
extern int __swap_count(swp_entry_t entry);
extern bool swap_entry_swapped(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry);
extern int swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry);
-struct swap_info_struct *swp_swap_info(swp_entry_t entry);
struct backing_dev_info;
extern int init_swap_address_space(unsigned int type, unsigned long nr_pages);
extern void exit_swap_address_space(unsigned int type);
@@ -492,11 +491,6 @@ static inline void put_swap_device(struct swap_info_struct *si)
}
#else /* CONFIG_SWAP */
-static inline struct swap_info_struct *swp_swap_info(swp_entry_t entry)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
static inline struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_device(swp_entry_t entry)
{
return NULL;
diff --git a/mm/page_io.c b/mm/page_io.c
index a2056a5ecb13..3c342db77ce3 100644
--- a/mm/page_io.c
+++ b/mm/page_io.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static bool is_folio_zero_filled(struct folio *folio)
static void swap_zeromap_folio_set(struct folio *folio)
{
struct obj_cgroup *objcg = get_obj_cgroup_from_folio(folio);
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap);
int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
swp_entry_t entry;
unsigned int i;
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void swap_zeromap_folio_set(struct folio *folio)
static void swap_zeromap_folio_clear(struct folio *folio)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap);
swp_entry_t entry;
unsigned int i;
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static void sio_write_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, long ret)
static void swap_writepage_fs(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **swap_plug)
{
struct swap_iocb *sio = swap_plug ? *swap_plug : NULL;
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap);
struct file *swap_file = sis->swap_file;
loff_t pos = swap_dev_pos(folio->swap);
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static void swap_writepage_bdev_async(struct folio *folio,
void __swap_writepage(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **swap_plug)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap);
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
/*
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static bool swap_read_folio_zeromap(struct folio *folio)
static void swap_read_folio_fs(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **plug)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap);
struct swap_iocb *sio = NULL;
loff_t pos = swap_dev_pos(folio->swap);
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ static void swap_read_folio_bdev_async(struct folio *folio,
void swap_read_folio(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **plug)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap);
bool synchronous = sis->flags & SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO;
bool workingset = folio_test_workingset(folio);
unsigned long pflags;
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index 138b5197c35e..30b1039c27fe 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ extern int page_cluster;
#define swap_entry_order(order) 0
#endif
+extern struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[];
+
/*
* We use this to track usage of a cluster. A cluster is a block of swap disk
* space with SWAPFILE_CLUSTER pages long and naturally aligns in disk. All
@@ -53,9 +55,29 @@ enum swap_cluster_flags {
#include <linux/swapops.h> /* for swp_offset */
#include <linux/blk_types.h> /* for bio_end_io_t */
-static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swp_offset_cluster(
+/*
+ * Callers of all helpers below must ensure the entry, type, or offset is
+ * valid, and protect the swap device with reference count or locks.
+ */
+static inline struct swap_info_struct *__swap_type_to_info(int type)
+{
+ struct swap_info_struct *si;
+
+ si = READ_ONCE(swap_info[type]); /* rcu_dereference() */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(percpu_ref_is_zero(&si->users)); /* race with swapoff */
+ return si;
+}
+
+static inline struct swap_info_struct *__swap_entry_to_info(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return __swap_type_to_info(swp_type(entry));
+}
+
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *__swap_offset_to_cluster(
struct swap_info_struct *si, pgoff_t offset)
{
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(percpu_ref_is_zero(&si->users)); /* race with swapoff */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(offset >= si->max);
return &si->cluster_info[offset / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER];
}
@@ -70,8 +92,9 @@ static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swp_offset_cluster(
static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_lock(
struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset)
{
- struct swap_cluster_info *ci = swp_offset_cluster(si, offset);
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = __swap_offset_to_cluster(si, offset);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(percpu_ref_is_zero(&si->users)); /* race with swapoff */
spin_lock(&ci->lock);
return ci;
}
@@ -170,7 +193,7 @@ void swap_update_readahead(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
static inline unsigned int folio_swap_flags(struct folio *folio)
{
- return swp_swap_info(folio->swap)->flags;
+ return __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap)->flags;
}
/*
@@ -181,7 +204,7 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_swap_flags(struct folio *folio)
static inline int swap_zeromap_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr,
bool *is_zeromap)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
unsigned long start = swp_offset(entry);
unsigned long end = start + max_nr;
bool first_bit;
@@ -200,7 +223,7 @@ static inline int swap_zeromap_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr,
static inline int non_swapcache_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *si = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ struct swap_info_struct *si = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(entry);
int i;
@@ -219,6 +242,11 @@ static inline int non_swapcache_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr)
#else /* CONFIG_SWAP */
struct swap_iocb;
+static inline struct swap_info_struct *__swap_entry_to_info(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static inline void swap_read_folio(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **plug)
{
}
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 9225d6b695ad..0ad4f3b41f1b 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct mempolicy *mpol, pgoff_t ilx, bool *new_page_allocated,
bool skip_if_exists)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *si = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ struct swap_info_struct *si = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
struct folio *folio;
struct folio *new_folio = NULL;
struct folio *result = NULL;
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ struct folio *swap_cluster_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
unsigned long offset = entry_offset;
unsigned long start_offset, end_offset;
unsigned long mask;
- struct swap_info_struct *si = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ struct swap_info_struct *si = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
struct blk_plug plug;
struct swap_iocb *splug = NULL;
bool page_allocated;
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 700e07cb1cbd..6f7a8c98d14d 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static PLIST_HEAD(swap_active_head);
static struct plist_head *swap_avail_heads;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_avail_lock);
-static struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
+struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
static DEFINE_MUTEX(swapon_mutex);
@@ -124,14 +124,20 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct percpu_swap_cluster, percpu_swap_cluster) = {
.lock = INIT_LOCAL_LOCK(),
};
-static struct swap_info_struct *swap_type_to_swap_info(int type)
+/* May return NULL on invalid type, caller must check for NULL return */
+static struct swap_info_struct *swap_type_to_info(int type)
{
if (type >= MAX_SWAPFILES)
return NULL;
-
return READ_ONCE(swap_info[type]); /* rcu_dereference() */
}
+/* May return NULL on invalid entry, caller must check for NULL return */
+static struct swap_info_struct *swap_entry_to_info(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return swap_type_to_info(swp_type(entry));
+}
+
static inline unsigned char swap_count(unsigned char ent)
{
return ent & ~SWAP_HAS_CACHE; /* may include COUNT_CONTINUED flag */
@@ -342,7 +348,7 @@ offset_to_swap_extent(struct swap_info_struct *sis, unsigned long offset)
sector_t swap_folio_sector(struct folio *folio)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *sis = swp_swap_info(folio->swap);
+ struct swap_info_struct *sis = __swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap);
struct swap_extent *se;
sector_t sector;
pgoff_t offset;
@@ -1300,7 +1306,7 @@ static struct swap_info_struct *_swap_info_get(swp_entry_t entry)
if (!entry.val)
goto out;
- si = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ si = swap_entry_to_info(entry);
if (!si)
goto bad_nofile;
if (data_race(!(si->flags & SWP_USED)))
@@ -1415,7 +1421,7 @@ struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_device(swp_entry_t entry)
if (!entry.val)
goto out;
- si = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ si = swap_entry_to_info(entry);
if (!si)
goto bad_nofile;
if (!get_swap_device_info(si))
@@ -1538,7 +1544,7 @@ static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned char *map_end = map + nr_pages;
/* It should never free entries across different clusters */
- VM_BUG_ON(ci != swp_offset_cluster(si, offset + nr_pages - 1));
+ VM_BUG_ON(ci != __swap_offset_to_cluster(si, offset + nr_pages - 1));
VM_BUG_ON(cluster_is_empty(ci));
VM_BUG_ON(ci->count < nr_pages);
@@ -1596,7 +1602,7 @@ void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
int __swap_count(swp_entry_t entry)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *si = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ struct swap_info_struct *si = __swap_entry_to_info(entry);
pgoff_t offset = swp_offset(entry);
return swap_count(si->swap_map[offset]);
@@ -1827,7 +1833,7 @@ void free_swap_and_cache_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr)
swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int type)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *si = swap_type_to_swap_info(type);
+ struct swap_info_struct *si = swap_type_to_info(type);
unsigned long offset;
swp_entry_t entry = {0};
@@ -1908,7 +1914,7 @@ int find_first_swap(dev_t *device)
*/
sector_t swapdev_block(int type, pgoff_t offset)
{
- struct swap_info_struct *si = swap_type_to_swap_info(type);
+ struct swap_info_struct *si = swap_type_to_info(type);
struct swap_extent *se;
if (!si || !(si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK))
@@ -2837,7 +2843,7 @@ static void *swap_start(struct seq_file *swap, loff_t *pos)
if (!l)
return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
- for (type = 0; (si = swap_type_to_swap_info(type)); type++) {
+ for (type = 0; (si = swap_type_to_info(type)); type++) {
if (!(si->flags & SWP_USED) || !si->swap_map)
continue;
if (!--l)
@@ -2858,7 +2864,7 @@ static void *swap_next(struct seq_file *swap, void *v, loff_t *pos)
type = si->type + 1;
++(*pos);
- for (; (si = swap_type_to_swap_info(type)); type++) {
+ for (; (si = swap_type_to_info(type)); type++) {
if (!(si->flags & SWP_USED) || !si->swap_map)
continue;
return si;
@@ -3531,7 +3537,7 @@ static int __swap_duplicate(swp_entry_t entry, unsigned char usage, int nr)
unsigned char has_cache;
int err, i;
- si = swp_swap_info(entry);
+ si = swap_entry_to_info(entry);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!si)) {
pr_err("%s%08lx\n", Bad_file, entry.val);
return -EINVAL;
@@ -3646,11 +3652,6 @@ void swapcache_clear(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry, int nr)
swap_entries_put_cache(si, entry, nr);
}
-struct swap_info_struct *swp_swap_info(swp_entry_t entry)
-{
- return swap_type_to_swap_info(swp_type(entry));
-}
-
/*
* add_swap_count_continuation - called when a swap count is duplicated
* beyond SWAP_MAP_MAX, it allocates a new page and links that to the entry's
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 08/15] mm, swap: cleanup swap cache API and add kerneldoc
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] mm, swap: tidy up swap device and cluster info helpers Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] mm/shmem, swap: remove redundant error handling for replacing folio Kairui Song
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
In preparation for replacing the swap cache backend with the swap table,
clean up and add proper kernel doc for all swap cache APIs. Now all swap
cache APIs are well-defined with consistent names.
No feature change, only renaming and documenting.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
mm/shmem.c | 10 +++---
mm/swap.h | 48 ++++++++++++++-----------
mm/swap_state.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
mm/swapfile.c | 8 ++---
mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
mm/zswap.c | 2 +-
9 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 8d078aa2738a..2a05b1fdd445 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -4525,7 +4525,7 @@ static void filemap_cachestat(struct address_space *mapping,
* invalidation, so there might not be
* a shadow in the swapcache (yet).
*/
- shadow = get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp);
+ shadow = swap_cache_get_shadow(swp);
if (!shadow)
goto resched;
}
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index 6d9134e3d115..3edebb0cda30 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static int me_swapcache_clean(struct page_state *ps, struct page *p)
struct folio *folio = page_folio(p);
int ret;
- delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
+ swap_cache_del_folio(folio);
ret = delete_from_lru_cache(folio) ? MF_FAILED : MF_RECOVERED;
folio_unlock(folio);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 5808c4ef21b3..41e641823558 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4699,7 +4699,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
memcg1_swapin(entry, nr_pages);
- shadow = get_shadow_from_swap_cache(entry);
+ shadow = swap_cache_get_shadow(entry);
if (shadow)
workingset_refault(folio, shadow);
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 410f27bc4752..077744a9e9da 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1661,13 +1661,13 @@ int shmem_writeout(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **plug,
}
/*
- * The delete_from_swap_cache() below could be left for
+ * The swap_cache_del_folio() below could be left for
* shrink_folio_list()'s folio_free_swap() to dispose of;
* but I'm a little nervous about letting this folio out of
* shmem_writeout() in a hybrid half-tmpfs-half-swap state
* e.g. folio_mapping(folio) might give an unexpected answer.
*/
- delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
+ swap_cache_del_folio(folio);
goto redirty;
}
if (nr_pages > 1)
@@ -2045,7 +2045,7 @@ static struct folio *shmem_swap_alloc_folio(struct inode *inode,
new->swap = entry;
memcg1_swapin(entry, nr_pages);
- shadow = get_shadow_from_swap_cache(entry);
+ shadow = swap_cache_get_shadow(entry);
if (shadow)
workingset_refault(new, shadow);
folio_add_lru(new);
@@ -2183,7 +2183,7 @@ static void shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
folio_wait_writeback(folio);
if (!skip_swapcache)
- delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
+ swap_cache_del_folio(folio);
/*
* Don't treat swapin error folio as alloced. Otherwise inode->i_blocks
* won't be 0 when inode is released and thus trigger WARN_ON(i_blocks)
@@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
folio->swap.val = 0;
swapcache_clear(si, swap, nr_pages);
} else {
- delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
+ swap_cache_del_folio(folio);
}
folio_mark_dirty(folio);
swap_free_nr(swap, nr_pages);
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index 30b1039c27fe..6c4acb549bec 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -167,17 +167,29 @@ static inline bool folio_matches_swap_entry(const struct folio *folio,
return folio_entry.val == round_down(entry.val, nr_pages);
}
+/*
+ * All swap cache helpers below require the caller to ensure the swap entries
+ * used are valid and stablize the device by any of the following ways:
+ * - Hold a reference by get_swap_device(): this ensures a single entry is
+ * valid and increases the swap device's refcount.
+ * - Locking a folio in the swap cache: this ensures the folio's swap entries
+ * are valid and pinned, also implies reference to the device.
+ * - Locking anything referencing the swap entry: e.g. PTL that protects
+ * swap entries in the page table, similar to locking swap cache folio.
+ * - See the comment of get_swap_device() for more complex usage.
+ */
+struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
+void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry);
+int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
+ gfp_t gfp, void **shadow);
+void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio);
+void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio,
+ swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow);
+void swap_cache_clear_shadow(int type, unsigned long begin,
+ unsigned long end);
+
void show_swap_cache_info(void);
-void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry);
-int add_to_swap_cache(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
- gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp);
-void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio,
- swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow);
-void delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio);
-void clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(int type, unsigned long begin,
- unsigned long end);
void swapcache_clear(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry, int nr);
-struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
struct folio *read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
struct swap_iocb **plug);
@@ -305,28 +317,22 @@ static inline struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
return NULL;
}
-static inline void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
+static inline void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
{
return NULL;
}
-static inline int add_to_swap_cache(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
- gfp_t gfp_mask, void **shadowp)
-{
- return -1;
-}
-
-static inline void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio,
- swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow)
+static inline int swap_cache_add_folio(swp_entry_t entry, struct folio *folio,
+ gfp_t gfp, void **shadow)
{
+ return -EINVAL;
}
-static inline void delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio)
+static inline void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
}
-static inline void clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(int type, unsigned long begin,
- unsigned long end)
+static inline void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow)
{
}
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 0ad4f3b41f1b..f3a32a06a950 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
* Context: Caller must ensure @entry is valid and protect the swap device
* with reference count or locks.
* Return: Returns the found folio on success, NULL otherwise. The caller
- * must lock and check if the folio still matches the swap entry before
- * use (e.g. with folio_matches_swap_entry).
+ * must lock nd check if the folio still matches the swap entry before
+ * use (e.g., folio_matches_swap_entry).
*/
struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
{
@@ -90,7 +90,15 @@ struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
return folio;
}
-void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
+/**
+ * swap_cache_get_shadow - Looks up a shadow in the swap cache.
+ * @entry: swap entry used for the lookup.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure @entry is valid and protect the swap device
+ * with reference count or locks.
+ * Return: Returns either NULL or an XA_VALUE (shadow).
+ */
+void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
{
struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
@@ -102,12 +110,21 @@ void *get_shadow_from_swap_cache(swp_entry_t entry)
return NULL;
}
-/*
- * add_to_swap_cache resembles filemap_add_folio on swapper_space,
- * but sets SwapCache flag and 'swap' instead of mapping and index.
+/**
+ * swap_cache_add_folio - Add a folio into the swap cache.
+ * @folio: The folio to be added.
+ * @entry: The swap entry corresponding to the folio.
+ * @gfp: gfp_mask for XArray node allocation.
+ * @shadowp: If a shadow is found, return the shadow.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure @entry is valid and protect the swap device
+ * with reference count or locks.
+ * The caller also needs to mark the corresponding swap_map slots with
+ * SWAP_HAS_CACHE to avoid race or conflict.
+ * Return: Returns 0 on success, error code otherwise.
*/
-int add_to_swap_cache(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
- gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
+int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
+ gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
{
struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
@@ -155,12 +172,20 @@ int add_to_swap_cache(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
return xas_error(&xas);
}
-/*
- * This must be called only on folios that have
- * been verified to be in the swap cache.
+/**
+ * __swap_cache_del_folio - Removes a folio from the swap cache.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ * @entry: The first swap entry that the folio corresponds to.
+ * @shadow: shadow value to be filled in the swap cache.
+ *
+ * Removes a folio from the swap cache and fills a shadow in place.
+ * This won't put the folio's refcount. The caller has to do that.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must hold the xa_lock, ensure the folio is
+ * locked and in the swap cache, using the index of @entry.
*/
-void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio,
- swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow)
+void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio,
+ swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow)
{
struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
int i;
@@ -186,27 +211,40 @@ void __delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio,
__lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, -nr);
}
-/*
- * This must be called only on folios that have
- * been verified to be in the swap cache and locked.
- * It will never put the folio into the free list,
- * the caller has a reference on the folio.
+/**
+ * swap_cache_del_folio - Removes a folio from the swap cache.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ *
+ * Same as __swap_cache_del_folio, but handles lock and refcount. The
+ * caller must ensure the folio is either clean or has a swap count
+ * equal to zero, or it may cause data loss.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure the folio is locked and in the swap cache.
*/
-void delete_from_swap_cache(struct folio *folio)
+void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
swp_entry_t entry = folio->swap;
struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
xa_lock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
- __delete_from_swap_cache(folio, entry, NULL);
+ __swap_cache_del_folio(folio, entry, NULL);
xa_unlock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
put_swap_folio(folio, entry);
folio_ref_sub(folio, folio_nr_pages(folio));
}
-void clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(int type, unsigned long begin,
- unsigned long end)
+/**
+ * swap_cache_clear_shadow - Clears a set of shadows in the swap cache.
+ * @type: Indicates the swap device.
+ * @begin: Beginning offset of the range.
+ * @end: Ending offset of the range.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure the range is valid and hold a reference to
+ * the swap device.
+ */
+void swap_cache_clear_shadow(int type, unsigned long begin,
+ unsigned long end)
{
unsigned long curr = begin;
void *old;
@@ -393,7 +431,7 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
goto put_and_return;
/*
- * We might race against __delete_from_swap_cache(), and
+ * We might race against __swap_cache_del_folio(), and
* stumble across a swap_map entry whose SWAP_HAS_CACHE
* has not yet been cleared. Or race against another
* __read_swap_cache_async(), which has set SWAP_HAS_CACHE
@@ -412,7 +450,7 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
goto fail_unlock;
/* May fail (-ENOMEM) if XArray node allocation failed. */
- if (add_to_swap_cache(new_folio, entry, gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK, &shadow))
+ if (swap_cache_add_folio(new_folio, entry, gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK, &shadow))
goto fail_unlock;
memcg1_swapin(entry, 1);
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 6f7a8c98d14d..51f781c43537 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
if (!need_reclaim)
goto out_unlock;
- delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
+ swap_cache_del_folio(folio);
folio_set_dirty(folio);
ret = nr_pages;
out_unlock:
@@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ static void swap_range_free(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset,
swap_slot_free_notify(si->bdev, offset);
offset++;
}
- clear_shadow_from_swap_cache(si->type, begin, end);
+ swap_cache_clear_shadow(si->type, begin, end);
/*
* Make sure that try_to_unuse() observes si->inuse_pages reaching 0
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ int folio_alloc_swap(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp)
* TODO: this could cause a theoretical memory reclaim
* deadlock in the swap out path.
*/
- if (add_to_swap_cache(folio, entry, gfp | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC, NULL))
+ if (swap_cache_add_folio(folio, entry, gfp | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC, NULL))
goto out_free;
return 0;
@@ -1759,7 +1759,7 @@ bool folio_free_swap(struct folio *folio)
if (folio_swapped(folio))
return false;
- delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
+ swap_cache_del_folio(folio);
folio_set_dirty(folio);
return true;
}
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index ca9e1cd3cd68..c79c6806560b 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio,
if (reclaimed && !mapping_exiting(mapping))
shadow = workingset_eviction(folio, target_memcg);
- __delete_from_swap_cache(folio, swap, shadow);
+ __swap_cache_del_folio(folio, swap, shadow);
memcg1_swapout(folio, swap);
xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
put_swap_folio(folio, swap);
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 63045e3fb1f5..1b1edecde6a7 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zswap_entry *entry,
out:
if (ret && ret != -EEXIST) {
- delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
+ swap_cache_del_folio(folio);
folio_unlock(folio);
}
folio_put(folio);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 09/15] mm/shmem, swap: remove redundant error handling for replacing folio
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] mm, swap: cleanup swap cache API and add kerneldoc Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-24 21:55 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] mm, swap: wrap swap cache replacement with a helper Kairui Song
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Shmem may replace a folio in the swap cache if the cached one doesn't
fit the swapin's GFP zone. When doing so, shmem has already double
checked that the swap cache folio is locked, still has the swap cache
flag set, and contains the wanted swap entry. So it is impossible to
fail due to an XArray mismatch. There is even a comment for that.
Delete the defensive error handling path, and add a WARN_ON instead:
if that happened, something has broken the basic principle of how the
swap cache works, we should catch and fix that.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
mm/shmem.c | 32 +++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index 077744a9e9da..dc17717e5631 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2121,35 +2121,17 @@ static int shmem_replace_folio(struct folio **foliop, gfp_t gfp,
/* Swap cache still stores N entries instead of a high-order entry */
xa_lock_irq(&swap_mapping->i_pages);
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
- void *item = xas_load(&xas);
-
- if (item != old) {
- error = -ENOENT;
- break;
- }
-
- xas_store(&xas, new);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(xas_store(&xas, new) != old);
xas_next(&xas);
}
- if (!error) {
- mem_cgroup_replace_folio(old, new);
- shmem_update_stats(new, nr_pages);
- shmem_update_stats(old, -nr_pages);
- }
+
+ mem_cgroup_replace_folio(old, new);
+ shmem_update_stats(new, nr_pages);
+ shmem_update_stats(old, -nr_pages);
xa_unlock_irq(&swap_mapping->i_pages);
- if (unlikely(error)) {
- /*
- * Is this possible? I think not, now that our callers
- * check both the swapcache flag and folio->private
- * after getting the folio lock; but be defensive.
- * Reverse old to newpage for clear and free.
- */
- old = new;
- } else {
- folio_add_lru(new);
- *foliop = new;
- }
+ folio_add_lru(new);
+ *foliop = new;
folio_clear_swapcache(old);
old->private = NULL;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 10/15] mm, swap: wrap swap cache replacement with a helper
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] mm/shmem, swap: remove redundant error handling for replacing folio Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] mm, swap: use the swap table for the swap cache and switch API Kairui Song
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
There are currently three swap cache users that are trying to replace an
existing folio with a new one: huge memory splitting, migration, and
shmem replacement. What they are doing is quite similar.
Introduce a common helper for this. In later commits, this can be easily
switched to use the swap table by updating this helper.
The newly added helper also makes the swap cache API better defined, and
make debugging easier by adding a few more debug checks.
Migration and shmem replace are meant to clone the folio, including
content, swap entry value, and flags. And splitting will adjust each
sub folio's swap entry according to order, which could be non-uniform in
the future. So document it clearly that it's the caller's responsibility
to set up the new folio's swap entries and flags before calling the helper.
The helper will just follow the new folio's entry value.
This also prepares for replacing high-order folios in the swap cache.
Currently, only splitting to order 0 is allowed for swap cache folios.
Using the new helper, we can handle high-order folio splitting better.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 4 +---
mm/migrate.c | 11 +++--------
mm/shmem.c | 11 ++---------
mm/swap.h | 5 +++++
mm/swap_state.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 26cedfcd7418..4c66e358685b 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3798,9 +3798,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
* NOTE: shmem in swap cache is not supported yet.
*/
if (swap_cache) {
- __xa_store(&swap_cache->i_pages,
- swap_cache_index(new_folio->swap),
- new_folio, 0);
+ __swap_cache_replace_folio(folio, new_folio);
continue;
}
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 8e435a078fc3..c69cc13db692 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -566,7 +566,6 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
struct zone *oldzone, *newzone;
int dirty;
long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
- long entries, i;
if (!mapping) {
/* Take off deferred split queue while frozen and memcg set */
@@ -615,9 +614,6 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
folio_set_swapcache(newfolio);
newfolio->private = folio_get_private(folio);
- entries = nr;
- } else {
- entries = 1;
}
/* Move dirty while folio refs frozen and newfolio not yet exposed */
@@ -627,11 +623,10 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
folio_set_dirty(newfolio);
}
- /* Swap cache still stores N entries instead of a high-order entry */
- for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
+ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
+ __swap_cache_replace_folio(folio, newfolio);
+ else
xas_store(&xas, newfolio);
- xas_next(&xas);
- }
/*
* Drop cache reference from old folio by unfreezing
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index dc17717e5631..bbfbbc1bc4d6 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2086,10 +2086,8 @@ static int shmem_replace_folio(struct folio **foliop, gfp_t gfp,
struct folio *new, *old = *foliop;
swp_entry_t entry = old->swap;
struct address_space *swap_mapping = swap_address_space(entry);
- pgoff_t swap_index = swap_cache_index(entry);
- XA_STATE(xas, &swap_mapping->i_pages, swap_index);
int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(old);
- int error = 0, i;
+ int error = 0;
/*
* We have arrived here because our zones are constrained, so don't
@@ -2118,13 +2116,8 @@ static int shmem_replace_folio(struct folio **foliop, gfp_t gfp,
new->swap = entry;
folio_set_swapcache(new);
- /* Swap cache still stores N entries instead of a high-order entry */
xa_lock_irq(&swap_mapping->i_pages);
- for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(xas_store(&xas, new) != old);
- xas_next(&xas);
- }
-
+ __swap_cache_replace_folio(old, new);
mem_cgroup_replace_folio(old, new);
shmem_update_stats(new, nr_pages);
shmem_update_stats(old, -nr_pages);
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index 6c4acb549bec..fe579c81c6c4 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio);
void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio,
swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow);
+void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new);
void swap_cache_clear_shadow(int type, unsigned long begin,
unsigned long end);
@@ -336,6 +337,10 @@ static inline void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry
{
}
+static inline void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
+{
+}
+
static inline unsigned int folio_swap_flags(struct folio *folio)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index f3a32a06a950..d1f5b8fa52fc 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -234,6 +234,39 @@ void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio)
folio_ref_sub(folio, folio_nr_pages(folio));
}
+/**
+ * __swap_cache_replace_folio - Replace a folio in the swap cache.
+ * @old: The old folio to be replaced.
+ * @new: The new folio.
+ *
+ * Replace an existing folio in the swap cache with a new folio. The
+ * caller is responsible for setting up the new folio's flag and swap
+ * entries. Replacement will take the new folio's swap entry value as
+ * the starting offset to override all slots covered by the new folio.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure both folios are locked, also lock the
+ * swap address_space that holds the old folio to avoid races.
+ */
+void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
+{
+ swp_entry_t entry = new->swap;
+ unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(new);
+ unsigned long offset = swap_cache_index(entry);
+ unsigned long end = offset + nr_pages;
+
+ XA_STATE(xas, &swap_address_space(entry)->i_pages, offset);
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_swapcache(old) || !folio_test_swapcache(new));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(old) || !folio_test_locked(new));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry.val);
+
+ /* Swap cache still stores N entries instead of a high-order entry */
+ do {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(xas_store(&xas, new) != old);
+ xas_next(&xas);
+ } while (++offset < end);
+}
+
/**
* swap_cache_clear_shadow - Clears a set of shadows in the swap cache.
* @type: Indicates the swap device.
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 11/15] mm, swap: use the swap table for the swap cache and switch API
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] mm, swap: wrap swap cache replacement with a helper Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] mm, swap: mark swap address space ro and add context debug check Kairui Song
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Introduce basic swap table infrastructures, which are now just a
fixed-sized flat array inside each swap cluster, with access wrappers.
Each cluster contains a swap table of 512 entries. Each table entry is
an opaque atomic long. It could be in 3 types: a shadow type (XA_VALUE),
a folio type (pointer), or NULL.
In this first step, it only supports storing a folio or shadow, and it
is a drop-in replacement for the current swap cache. Convert all swap
cache users to use the new sets of APIs. Chris Li has been suggesting
using a new infrastructure for swap cache for better performance, and
that idea combined well with the swap table as the new backing
structure. Now the lock contention range is reduced to 2M clusters,
which is much smaller than the 64M address_space. And we can also drop
the multiple address_space design.
All the internal works are done with swap_cache_get_* helpers. Swap
cache lookup is still lock-less like before, and the helper's contexts
are same with original swap cache helpers. They still require a pin
on the swap device to prevent the backing data from being freed.
Swap cache updates are now protected by the swap cluster lock
instead of the XArray lock. This is mostly handled internally, but new
__swap_cache_* helpers require the caller to lock the cluster. So, a
few new cluster access and locking helpers are also introduced.
A fully cluster-based unified swap table can be implemented on top
of this to take care of all count tracking and synchronization work,
with dynamic allocation. It should reduce the memory usage while
making the performance even better.
Co-developed-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
include/linux/swap.h | 2 -
mm/huge_memory.c | 13 +-
mm/migrate.c | 19 ++-
mm/shmem.c | 8 +-
mm/swap.h | 154 +++++++++++++++++------
mm/swap_state.c | 293 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
mm/swap_table.h | 97 ++++++++++++++
mm/swapfile.c | 100 +++++++++++----
mm/vmscan.c | 20 ++-
10 files changed, 459 insertions(+), 248 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 mm/swap_table.h
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 3d113bfc3c82..4c8bbf70a3c7 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -16232,6 +16232,7 @@ F: include/linux/swapops.h
F: mm/page_io.c
F: mm/swap.c
F: mm/swap.h
+F: mm/swap_table.h
F: mm/swap_state.c
F: mm/swapfile.c
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 762f8db0e811..e818fbade1e2 100644
--- a/include/linux/swap.h
+++ b/include/linux/swap.h
@@ -480,8 +480,6 @@ extern int __swap_count(swp_entry_t entry);
extern bool swap_entry_swapped(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry);
extern int swp_swapcount(swp_entry_t entry);
struct backing_dev_info;
-extern int init_swap_address_space(unsigned int type, unsigned long nr_pages);
-extern void exit_swap_address_space(unsigned int type);
extern struct swap_info_struct *get_swap_device(swp_entry_t entry);
sector_t swap_folio_sector(struct folio *folio);
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 4c66e358685b..a9fc7a09167a 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3720,7 +3720,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
/* Prevent deferred_split_scan() touching ->_refcount */
spin_lock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
if (folio_ref_freeze(folio, 1 + extra_pins)) {
- struct address_space *swap_cache = NULL;
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = NULL;
struct lruvec *lruvec;
int expected_refs;
@@ -3764,8 +3764,7 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
goto fail;
}
- swap_cache = swap_address_space(folio->swap);
- xa_lock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
+ ci = swap_cluster_get_and_lock(folio);
}
/* lock lru list/PageCompound, ref frozen by page_ref_freeze */
@@ -3797,8 +3796,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
* Anonymous folio with swap cache.
* NOTE: shmem in swap cache is not supported yet.
*/
- if (swap_cache) {
- __swap_cache_replace_folio(folio, new_folio);
+ if (ci) {
+ __swap_cache_replace_folio(ci, folio, new_folio);
continue;
}
@@ -3833,8 +3832,8 @@ static int __folio_split(struct folio *folio, unsigned int new_order,
unlock_page_lruvec(lruvec);
- if (swap_cache)
- xa_unlock(&swap_cache->i_pages);
+ if (ci)
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
} else {
spin_unlock(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
ret = -EAGAIN;
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index c69cc13db692..aee61a980374 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio, int expected_count)
{
XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, folio_index(folio));
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = NULL;
struct zone *oldzone, *newzone;
int dirty;
long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -591,9 +592,16 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
oldzone = folio_zone(folio);
newzone = folio_zone(newfolio);
- xas_lock_irq(&xas);
+ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
+ ci = swap_cluster_get_and_lock_irq(folio);
+ else
+ xas_lock_irq(&xas);
+
if (!folio_ref_freeze(folio, expected_count)) {
- xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
+ if (ci)
+ swap_cluster_unlock_irq(ci);
+ else
+ xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
return -EAGAIN;
}
@@ -624,7 +632,7 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
}
if (folio_test_swapcache(folio))
- __swap_cache_replace_folio(folio, newfolio);
+ __swap_cache_replace_folio(ci, folio, newfolio);
else
xas_store(&xas, newfolio);
@@ -635,8 +643,11 @@ static int __folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
*/
folio_ref_unfreeze(folio, expected_count - nr);
- xas_unlock(&xas);
/* Leave irq disabled to prevent preemption while updating stats */
+ if (ci)
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
+ else
+ xas_unlock(&xas);
/*
* If moved to a different zone then also account
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index bbfbbc1bc4d6..cf0171a72e47 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -2083,9 +2083,9 @@ static int shmem_replace_folio(struct folio **foliop, gfp_t gfp,
struct shmem_inode_info *info, pgoff_t index,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
struct folio *new, *old = *foliop;
swp_entry_t entry = old->swap;
- struct address_space *swap_mapping = swap_address_space(entry);
int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(old);
int error = 0;
@@ -2116,12 +2116,12 @@ static int shmem_replace_folio(struct folio **foliop, gfp_t gfp,
new->swap = entry;
folio_set_swapcache(new);
- xa_lock_irq(&swap_mapping->i_pages);
- __swap_cache_replace_folio(old, new);
+ ci = swap_cluster_get_and_lock_irq(old);
+ __swap_cache_replace_folio(ci, old, new);
mem_cgroup_replace_folio(old, new);
shmem_update_stats(new, nr_pages);
shmem_update_stats(old, -nr_pages);
- xa_unlock_irq(&swap_mapping->i_pages);
+ swap_cluster_unlock_irq(ci);
folio_add_lru(new);
*foliop = new;
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index fe579c81c6c4..742db4d46d23 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#ifndef _MM_SWAP_H
#define _MM_SWAP_H
+#include <linux/atomic.h> /* for atomic_long_t */
struct mempolicy;
struct swap_iocb;
@@ -35,6 +36,7 @@ struct swap_cluster_info {
u16 count;
u8 flags;
u8 order;
+ atomic_long_t *table; /* Swap table entries, see mm/swap_table.h */
struct list_head list;
};
@@ -55,6 +57,11 @@ enum swap_cluster_flags {
#include <linux/swapops.h> /* for swp_offset */
#include <linux/blk_types.h> /* for bio_end_io_t */
+static inline unsigned int swp_cluster_offset(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return swp_offset(entry) % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
+}
+
/*
* Callers of all helpers below must ensure the entry, type, or offset is
* valid, and protect the swap device with reference count or locks.
@@ -81,6 +88,25 @@ static inline struct swap_cluster_info *__swap_offset_to_cluster(
return &si->cluster_info[offset / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER];
}
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *__swap_entry_to_cluster(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return __swap_offset_to_cluster(__swap_entry_to_info(entry),
+ swp_offset(entry));
+}
+
+static __always_inline struct swap_cluster_info *__swap_cluster_lock(
+ struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset, bool irq)
+{
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = __swap_offset_to_cluster(si, offset);
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(percpu_ref_is_zero(&si->users)); /* race with swapoff */
+ if (irq)
+ spin_lock_irq(&ci->lock);
+ else
+ spin_lock(&ci->lock);
+ return ci;
+}
+
/**
* swap_cluster_lock - Lock and return the swap cluster of given offset.
* @si: swap device the cluster belongs to.
@@ -92,11 +118,49 @@ static inline struct swap_cluster_info *__swap_offset_to_cluster(
static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_lock(
struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset)
{
- struct swap_cluster_info *ci = __swap_offset_to_cluster(si, offset);
+ return __swap_cluster_lock(si, offset, false);
+}
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(percpu_ref_is_zero(&si->users)); /* race with swapoff */
- spin_lock(&ci->lock);
- return ci;
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *__swap_cluster_get_and_lock(
+ const struct folio *folio, bool irq)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
+ return __swap_cluster_lock(__swap_entry_to_info(folio->swap),
+ swp_offset(folio->swap), irq);
+}
+
+/*
+ * swap_cluster_get_and_lock - Locks the cluster that holds a folio's entries.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ *
+ * This locks and returns the swap cluster that contains a folio's swap
+ * entries. The swap entries of a folio are always in one single cluster.
+ * The folio has to be locked so its swap entries won't change and the
+ * cluster won't be freed.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure the folio is locked and in the swap cache.
+ * Return: Pointer to the swap cluster.
+ */
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_get_and_lock(
+ const struct folio *folio)
+{
+ return __swap_cluster_get_and_lock(folio, false);
+}
+
+/*
+ * swap_cluster_get_and_lock_irq - Locks the cluster that holds a folio's entries.
+ * @folio: The folio.
+ *
+ * Same as swap_cluster_get_and_lock but also disable IRQ.
+ *
+ * Context: Caller must ensure the folio is locked and in the swap cache.
+ * Return: Pointer to the swap cluster.
+ */
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_get_and_lock_irq(
+ const struct folio *folio)
+{
+ return __swap_cluster_get_and_lock(folio, true);
}
static inline void swap_cluster_unlock(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
@@ -104,6 +168,11 @@ static inline void swap_cluster_unlock(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
}
+static inline void swap_cluster_unlock_irq(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+{
+ spin_unlock_irq(&ci->lock);
+}
+
/* linux/mm/page_io.c */
int sio_pool_init(void);
struct swap_iocb;
@@ -123,10 +192,11 @@ void __swap_writepage(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **swap_plug);
#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT 14
#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES (1 << SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT)
#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK (SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES - 1)
-extern struct address_space *swapper_spaces[];
-#define swap_address_space(entry) \
- (&swapper_spaces[swp_type(entry)][swp_offset(entry) \
- >> SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT])
+extern struct address_space swap_space;
+static inline struct address_space *swap_address_space(swp_entry_t entry)
+{
+ return &swap_space;
+}
/*
* Return the swap device position of the swap entry.
@@ -136,15 +206,6 @@ static inline loff_t swap_dev_pos(swp_entry_t entry)
return ((loff_t)swp_offset(entry)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
}
-/*
- * Return the swap cache index of the swap entry.
- */
-static inline pgoff_t swap_cache_index(swp_entry_t entry)
-{
- BUILD_BUG_ON((SWP_OFFSET_MASK | SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK) != SWP_OFFSET_MASK);
- return swp_offset(entry) & SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK;
-}
-
/**
* folio_matches_swap_entry - Check if a folio matches a given swap entry.
* @folio: The folio.
@@ -180,14 +241,14 @@ static inline bool folio_matches_swap_entry(const struct folio *folio,
*/
struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry);
void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry);
-int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
- gfp_t gfp, void **shadow);
+void swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void **shadow);
void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio);
-void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio,
- swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow);
-void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new);
-void swap_cache_clear_shadow(int type, unsigned long begin,
- unsigned long end);
+/* Below helpers require the caller to lock and pass in the swap cluster. */
+void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow);
+void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ struct folio *old, struct folio *new);
+void __swap_cache_clear_shadow(swp_entry_t entry, int nr_ents);
void show_swap_cache_info(void);
void swapcache_clear(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry, int nr);
@@ -255,6 +316,32 @@ static inline int non_swapcache_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr)
#else /* CONFIG_SWAP */
struct swap_iocb;
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_lock(
+ struct swap_info_struct *si, pgoff_t offset, bool irq)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_get_and_lock(
+ struct folio *folio)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline struct swap_cluster_info *swap_cluster_get_and_lock_irq(
+ struct folio *folio)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static inline void swap_cluster_unlock(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void swap_cluster_unlock_irq(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+{
+}
+
static inline struct swap_info_struct *__swap_entry_to_info(swp_entry_t entry)
{
return NULL;
@@ -272,11 +359,6 @@ static inline struct address_space *swap_address_space(swp_entry_t entry)
return NULL;
}
-static inline pgoff_t swap_cache_index(swp_entry_t entry)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static inline bool folio_matches_swap_entry(const struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
{
return false;
@@ -323,21 +405,21 @@ static inline void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
return NULL;
}
-static inline int swap_cache_add_folio(swp_entry_t entry, struct folio *folio,
- gfp_t gfp, void **shadow)
+static inline void swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void **shadow)
{
- return -EINVAL;
}
static inline void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
}
-static inline void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow)
+static inline void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow)
{
}
-static inline void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
+static inline void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
{
}
@@ -371,8 +453,10 @@ static inline int non_swapcache_batch(swp_entry_t entry, int max_nr)
*/
static inline pgoff_t folio_index(struct folio *folio)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
if (unlikely(folio_test_swapcache(folio)))
- return swap_cache_index(folio->swap);
+ return swp_offset(folio->swap);
+#endif
return folio->index;
}
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index d1f5b8fa52fc..2558a648d671 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/huge_mm.h>
#include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
#include "internal.h"
+#include "swap_table.h"
#include "swap.h"
/*
@@ -36,8 +37,10 @@ static const struct address_space_operations swap_aops = {
#endif
};
-struct address_space *swapper_spaces[MAX_SWAPFILES] __read_mostly;
-static unsigned int nr_swapper_spaces[MAX_SWAPFILES] __read_mostly;
+struct address_space swap_space __read_mostly = {
+ .a_ops = &swap_aops,
+};
+
static bool enable_vma_readahead __read_mostly = true;
#define SWAP_RA_ORDER_CEILING 5
@@ -83,11 +86,20 @@ void show_swap_cache_info(void)
*/
struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
{
- struct folio *folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry),
- swap_cache_index(entry));
- if (IS_ERR(folio))
- return NULL;
- return folio;
+ unsigned long swp_tb;
+ struct folio *folio;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ swp_tb = __swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
+ swp_cluster_offset(entry));
+ if (!swp_tb_is_folio(swp_tb))
+ return NULL;
+ folio = swp_tb_to_folio(swp_tb);
+ if (likely(folio_try_get(folio)))
+ return folio;
+ }
+
+ return NULL;
}
/**
@@ -100,13 +112,13 @@ struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
*/
void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
{
- struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
- pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
- void *shadow;
+ unsigned long swp_tb;
+
+ swp_tb = __swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
+ swp_cluster_offset(entry));
+ if (swp_tb_is_shadow(swp_tb))
+ return swp_tb_to_shadow(swp_tb);
- shadow = xa_load(&address_space->i_pages, idx);
- if (xa_is_value(shadow))
- return shadow;
return NULL;
}
@@ -119,61 +131,48 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
*
* Context: Caller must ensure @entry is valid and protect the swap device
* with reference count or locks.
- * The caller also needs to mark the corresponding swap_map slots with
- * SWAP_HAS_CACHE to avoid race or conflict.
- * Return: Returns 0 on success, error code otherwise.
+ * The caller also needs to update the corresponding swap_map slots with
+ * SWAP_HAS_CACHE bit to avoid race or conflict.
*/
-int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
- gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
+void swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry, void **shadowp)
{
- struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
- pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
- XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &address_space->i_pages, idx, folio_order(folio));
- unsigned long i, nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
- void *old;
-
- xas_set_update(&xas, workingset_update_node);
-
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
+ void *shadow = NULL;
+ unsigned long old_tb, new_tb;
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
+ unsigned int ci_start, ci_off, ci_end;
+ unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
+
+ new_tb = folio_to_swp_tb(folio);
+ ci_start = swp_cluster_offset(entry);
+ ci_end = ci_start + nr_pages;
+ ci_off = ci_start;
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(__swap_entry_to_info(entry), swp_offset(entry));
+ do {
+ old_tb = __swap_table_xchg(ci, ci_off, new_tb);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(swp_tb_is_folio(old_tb));
+ if (swp_tb_is_shadow(old_tb))
+ shadow = swp_tb_to_shadow(old_tb);
+ } while (++ci_off < ci_end);
- folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
+ folio_ref_add(folio, nr_pages);
folio_set_swapcache(folio);
folio->swap = entry;
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
- do {
- xas_lock_irq(&xas);
- xas_create_range(&xas);
- if (xas_error(&xas))
- goto unlock;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(xas.xa_index != idx + i, folio);
- if (shadowp) {
- old = xas_load(&xas);
- if (xa_is_value(old))
- *shadowp = old;
- }
- xas_store(&xas, folio);
- xas_next(&xas);
- }
- address_space->nrpages += nr;
- __node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, nr);
- __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, nr);
-unlock:
- xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
- } while (xas_nomem(&xas, gfp));
-
- if (!xas_error(&xas))
- return 0;
+ node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, nr_pages);
+ lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, nr_pages);
- folio_clear_swapcache(folio);
- folio_ref_sub(folio, nr);
- return xas_error(&xas);
+ if (shadowp)
+ *shadowp = shadow;
}
/**
* __swap_cache_del_folio - Removes a folio from the swap cache.
+ * @ci: The locked swap cluster.
* @folio: The folio.
* @entry: The first swap entry that the folio corresponds to.
* @shadow: shadow value to be filled in the swap cache.
@@ -181,34 +180,36 @@ int swap_cache_add_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry,
* Removes a folio from the swap cache and fills a shadow in place.
* This won't put the folio's refcount. The caller has to do that.
*
- * Context: Caller must hold the xa_lock, ensure the folio is
- * locked and in the swap cache, using the index of @entry.
+ * Context: Caller must ensure the folio is locked and in the swap cache
+ * using the index of @entry, and lock the cluster that holds the entries.
*/
-void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio,
+void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci, struct folio *folio,
swp_entry_t entry, void *shadow)
{
- struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
- int i;
- long nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
- pgoff_t idx = swap_cache_index(entry);
- XA_STATE(xas, &address_space->i_pages, idx);
-
- xas_set_update(&xas, workingset_update_node);
-
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
- VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_writeback(folio), folio);
-
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
- void *entry = xas_store(&xas, shadow);
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(entry != folio, entry);
- xas_next(&xas);
- }
+ unsigned long old_tb, new_tb;
+ unsigned int ci_start, ci_off, ci_end;
+ unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
+
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry) != ci);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(!folio_test_swapcache(folio), folio);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_test_writeback(folio), folio);
+
+ new_tb = shadow_swp_to_tb(shadow);
+ ci_start = swp_cluster_offset(entry);
+ ci_end = ci_start + nr_pages;
+ ci_off = ci_start;
+ do {
+ /* If shadow is NULL, we sets an empty shadow */
+ old_tb = __swap_table_xchg(ci, ci_off, new_tb);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!swp_tb_is_folio(old_tb) ||
+ swp_tb_to_folio(old_tb) != folio);
+ } while (++ci_off < ci_end);
+
folio->swap.val = 0;
folio_clear_swapcache(folio);
- address_space->nrpages -= nr;
- __node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, -nr);
- __lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, -nr);
+ node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FILE_PAGES, -nr_pages);
+ lruvec_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_SWAPCACHE, -nr_pages);
}
/**
@@ -223,12 +224,12 @@ void __swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio,
*/
void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
swp_entry_t entry = folio->swap;
- struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
- xa_lock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
- __swap_cache_del_folio(folio, entry, NULL);
- xa_unlock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
+ ci = swap_cluster_lock(__swap_entry_to_info(entry), swp_offset(entry));
+ __swap_cache_del_folio(ci, folio, entry, NULL);
+ swap_cluster_unlock(ci);
put_swap_folio(folio, entry);
folio_ref_sub(folio, folio_nr_pages(folio));
@@ -236,6 +237,7 @@ void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio)
/**
* __swap_cache_replace_folio - Replace a folio in the swap cache.
+ * @ci: The locked swap cluster.
* @old: The old folio to be replaced.
* @new: The new folio.
*
@@ -244,65 +246,62 @@ void swap_cache_del_folio(struct folio *folio)
* entries. Replacement will take the new folio's swap entry value as
* the starting offset to override all slots covered by the new folio.
*
- * Context: Caller must ensure both folios are locked, also lock the
- * swap address_space that holds the old folio to avoid races.
+ * Context: Caller must ensure both folios are locked, and lock the
+ * cluster that holds the old folio to be replaced.
*/
-void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
+void __swap_cache_replace_folio(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
{
swp_entry_t entry = new->swap;
unsigned long nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(new);
- unsigned long offset = swap_cache_index(entry);
- unsigned long end = offset + nr_pages;
-
- XA_STATE(xas, &swap_address_space(entry)->i_pages, offset);
+ unsigned int ci_off = swp_cluster_offset(entry);
+ unsigned int ci_end = ci_off + nr_pages;
+ unsigned long old_tb, new_tb;
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_swapcache(old) || !folio_test_swapcache(new));
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(old) || !folio_test_locked(new));
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry.val);
/* Swap cache still stores N entries instead of a high-order entry */
+ new_tb = folio_to_swp_tb(new);
do {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(xas_store(&xas, new) != old);
- xas_next(&xas);
- } while (++offset < end);
+ old_tb = __swap_table_xchg(ci, ci_off, new_tb);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!swp_tb_is_folio(old_tb) || swp_tb_to_folio(old_tb) != old);
+ } while (++ci_off < ci_end);
+
+ /*
+ * If the old folio is partially replaced (e.g., splitting a large
+ * folio, the old folio is shrunk, and new split sub folios replace
+ * the shrunk part), ensure the new folio doesn't overlap it.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) &&
+ folio_order(old) != folio_order(new)) {
+ ci_off = swp_cluster_offset(old->swap);
+ ci_end = ci_off + folio_nr_pages(old);
+ while (ci_off++ < ci_end)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(swp_tb_to_folio(__swap_table_get(ci, ci_off)) != old);
+ }
}
/**
* swap_cache_clear_shadow - Clears a set of shadows in the swap cache.
- * @type: Indicates the swap device.
- * @begin: Beginning offset of the range.
- * @end: Ending offset of the range.
+ * @entry: The starting index entry.
+ * @nr_ents: How many slots need to be cleared.
*
- * Context: Caller must ensure the range is valid and hold a reference to
- * the swap device.
+ * Context: Caller must ensure the range is valid, all in one single cluster,
+ * not occupied by any folio, and lock the cluster.
*/
-void swap_cache_clear_shadow(int type, unsigned long begin,
- unsigned long end)
+void __swap_cache_clear_shadow(swp_entry_t entry, int nr_ents)
{
- unsigned long curr = begin;
- void *old;
-
- for (;;) {
- swp_entry_t entry = swp_entry(type, curr);
- unsigned long index = curr & SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK;
- struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
- XA_STATE(xas, &address_space->i_pages, index);
-
- xas_set_update(&xas, workingset_update_node);
-
- xa_lock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
- xas_for_each(&xas, old, min(index + (end - curr), SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES)) {
- if (!xa_is_value(old))
- continue;
- xas_store(&xas, NULL);
- }
- xa_unlock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = __swap_entry_to_cluster(entry);
+ unsigned int ci_off = swp_cluster_offset(entry), ci_end;
+ unsigned long old;
- /* search the next swapcache until we meet end */
- curr = ALIGN((curr + 1), SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES);
- if (curr > end)
- break;
- }
+ ci_end = ci_off + nr_ents;
+ do {
+ old = __swap_table_xchg(ci, ci_off, null_to_swp_tb());
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(swp_tb_is_folio(old));
+ } while (++ci_off < ci_end);
}
/*
@@ -482,10 +481,7 @@ struct folio *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
if (mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_folio(new_folio, NULL, gfp_mask, entry))
goto fail_unlock;
- /* May fail (-ENOMEM) if XArray node allocation failed. */
- if (swap_cache_add_folio(new_folio, entry, gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK, &shadow))
- goto fail_unlock;
-
+ swap_cache_add_folio(new_folio, entry, &shadow);
memcg1_swapin(entry, 1);
if (shadow)
@@ -677,41 +673,6 @@ struct folio *swap_cluster_readahead(swp_entry_t entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
return folio;
}
-int init_swap_address_space(unsigned int type, unsigned long nr_pages)
-{
- struct address_space *spaces, *space;
- unsigned int i, nr;
-
- nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages, SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES);
- spaces = kvcalloc(nr, sizeof(struct address_space), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!spaces)
- return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
- space = spaces + i;
- xa_init_flags(&space->i_pages, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ);
- atomic_set(&space->i_mmap_writable, 0);
- space->a_ops = &swap_aops;
- /* swap cache doesn't use writeback related tags */
- mapping_set_no_writeback_tags(space);
- }
- nr_swapper_spaces[type] = nr;
- swapper_spaces[type] = spaces;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-void exit_swap_address_space(unsigned int type)
-{
- int i;
- struct address_space *spaces = swapper_spaces[type];
-
- for (i = 0; i < nr_swapper_spaces[type]; i++)
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!mapping_empty(&spaces[i]));
- kvfree(spaces);
- nr_swapper_spaces[type] = 0;
- swapper_spaces[type] = NULL;
-}
-
static int swap_vma_ra_win(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long *start,
unsigned long *end)
{
@@ -884,7 +845,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group swap_attr_group = {
.attrs = swap_attrs,
};
-static int __init swap_init_sysfs(void)
+static int __init swap_init(void)
{
int err;
struct kobject *swap_kobj;
@@ -899,11 +860,13 @@ static int __init swap_init_sysfs(void)
pr_err("failed to register swap group\n");
goto delete_obj;
}
+ /* Swap cache writeback is LRU based, no tags for it */
+ mapping_set_no_writeback_tags(&swap_space);
return 0;
delete_obj:
kobject_put(swap_kobj);
return err;
}
-subsys_initcall(swap_init_sysfs);
+subsys_initcall(swap_init);
#endif
diff --git a/mm/swap_table.h b/mm/swap_table.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e1f7cc009701
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/swap_table.h
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _MM_SWAP_TABLE_H
+#define _MM_SWAP_TABLE_H
+
+#include "swap.h"
+
+/*
+ * A swap table entry represents the status of a swap slot on a swap
+ * (physical or virtual) device. The swap table in each cluster is a
+ * 1:1 map of the swap slots in this cluster.
+ *
+ * Each swap table entry could be a pointer (folio), a XA_VALUE
+ * (shadow), or NULL.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Helpers for casting one type of info into a swap table entry.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long null_to_swp_tb(void)
+{
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned long) != sizeof(atomic_long_t));
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long folio_to_swp_tb(struct folio *folio)
+{
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(unsigned long) != sizeof(void *));
+ return (unsigned long)folio;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long shadow_swp_to_tb(void *shadow)
+{
+ BUILD_BUG_ON((BITS_PER_XA_VALUE + 1) !=
+ BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(unsigned long));
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(shadow && !xa_is_value(shadow));
+ return (unsigned long)shadow;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helpers for swap table entry type checking.
+ */
+static inline bool swp_tb_is_null(unsigned long swp_tb)
+{
+ return !swp_tb;
+}
+
+static inline bool swp_tb_is_folio(unsigned long swp_tb)
+{
+ return !xa_is_value((void *)swp_tb) && !swp_tb_is_null(swp_tb);
+}
+
+static inline bool swp_tb_is_shadow(unsigned long swp_tb)
+{
+ return xa_is_value((void *)swp_tb);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helpers for retrieving info from swap table.
+ */
+static inline struct folio *swp_tb_to_folio(unsigned long swp_tb)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON(!swp_tb_is_folio(swp_tb));
+ return (void *)swp_tb;
+}
+
+static inline void *swp_tb_to_shadow(unsigned long swp_tb)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON(!swp_tb_is_shadow(swp_tb));
+ return (void *)swp_tb;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helpers for accessing or modifying the swap table of a cluster,
+ * the swap cluster must be locked.
+ */
+static inline void __swap_table_set(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ unsigned int off, unsigned long swp_tb)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
+ atomic_long_set(&ci->table[off], swp_tb);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __swap_table_xchg(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ unsigned int off, unsigned long swp_tb)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
+ /* Ordering is guaranteed by cluster lock, relax */
+ return atomic_long_xchg_relaxed(&ci->table[off], swp_tb);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long __swap_table_get(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ unsigned int off)
+{
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
+ return atomic_long_read(&ci->table[off]);
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 51f781c43537..b183e96be289 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
#include <linux/swapops.h>
#include <linux/swap_cgroup.h>
+#include "swap_table.h"
#include "internal.h"
#include "swap.h"
@@ -421,6 +422,34 @@ static inline unsigned int cluster_offset(struct swap_info_struct *si,
return cluster_index(si, ci) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
}
+static int swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+{
+ WARN_ON(ci->table);
+ ci->table = kzalloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ci->table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void swap_cluster_free_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+{
+ unsigned int ci_off;
+ unsigned long swp_tb;
+
+ if (!ci->table)
+ return;
+
+ for (ci_off = 0; ci_off < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; ci_off++) {
+ swp_tb = __swap_table_get(ci, ci_off);
+ if (!swp_tb_is_null(swp_tb))
+ pr_err_once("swap: unclean swap space on swapoff: 0x%lx",
+ swp_tb);
+ }
+
+ kfree(ci->table);
+ ci->table = NULL;
+}
+
static void move_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
struct swap_cluster_info *ci, struct list_head *list,
enum swap_cluster_flags new_flags)
@@ -703,6 +732,26 @@ static bool cluster_scan_range(struct swap_info_struct *si,
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Currently, the swap table is not used for count tracking, just
+ * do a sanity check here to ensure nothing leaked, so the swap
+ * table should be empty upon freeing.
+ */
+static void swap_cluster_assert_table_empty(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ unsigned int start, unsigned int nr)
+{
+ unsigned int ci_off = start % SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
+ unsigned int ci_end = ci_off + nr;
+ unsigned long swp_tb;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM)) {
+ do {
+ swp_tb = __swap_table_get(ci, ci_off);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!swp_tb_is_null(swp_tb));
+ } while (++ci_off < ci_end);
+ }
+}
+
static bool cluster_alloc_range(struct swap_info_struct *si, struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
unsigned int start, unsigned char usage,
unsigned int order)
@@ -722,6 +771,7 @@ static bool cluster_alloc_range(struct swap_info_struct *si, struct swap_cluster
ci->order = order;
memset(si->swap_map + start, usage, nr_pages);
+ swap_cluster_assert_table_empty(ci, start, nr_pages);
swap_range_alloc(si, nr_pages);
ci->count += nr_pages;
@@ -1124,7 +1174,7 @@ static void swap_range_free(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset,
swap_slot_free_notify(si->bdev, offset);
offset++;
}
- swap_cache_clear_shadow(si->type, begin, end);
+ __swap_cache_clear_shadow(swp_entry(si->type, begin), nr_entries);
/*
* Make sure that try_to_unuse() observes si->inuse_pages reaching 0
@@ -1281,16 +1331,7 @@ int folio_alloc_swap(struct folio *folio, gfp_t gfp)
if (!entry.val)
return -ENOMEM;
- /*
- * XArray node allocations from PF_MEMALLOC contexts could
- * completely exhaust the page allocator. __GFP_NOMEMALLOC
- * stops emergency reserves from being allocated.
- *
- * TODO: this could cause a theoretical memory reclaim
- * deadlock in the swap out path.
- */
- if (swap_cache_add_folio(folio, entry, gfp | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC, NULL))
- goto out_free;
+ swap_cache_add_folio(folio, entry, NULL);
return 0;
@@ -1556,6 +1597,7 @@ static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(entry, nr_pages);
swap_range_free(si, offset, nr_pages);
+ swap_cluster_assert_table_empty(ci, offset, nr_pages);
if (!ci->count)
free_cluster(si, ci);
@@ -2634,6 +2676,18 @@ static void wait_for_allocation(struct swap_info_struct *si)
}
}
+static void free_cluster_info(struct swap_cluster_info *cluster_info,
+ unsigned long maxpages)
+{
+ int i, nr_clusters = DIV_ROUND_UP(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
+
+ if (!cluster_info)
+ return;
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++)
+ swap_cluster_free_table(&cluster_info[i]);
+ kvfree(cluster_info);
+}
+
/*
* Called after swap device's reference count is dead, so
* neither scan nor allocation will use it.
@@ -2768,12 +2822,13 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
swap_file = p->swap_file;
p->swap_file = NULL;
- p->max = 0;
swap_map = p->swap_map;
p->swap_map = NULL;
zeromap = p->zeromap;
p->zeromap = NULL;
cluster_info = p->cluster_info;
+ free_cluster_info(cluster_info, p->max);
+ p->max = 0;
p->cluster_info = NULL;
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
@@ -2784,10 +2839,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
p->global_cluster = NULL;
vfree(swap_map);
kvfree(zeromap);
- kvfree(cluster_info);
/* Destroy swap account information */
swap_cgroup_swapoff(p->type);
- exit_swap_address_space(p->type);
inode = mapping->host;
@@ -3171,8 +3224,11 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
if (!cluster_info)
goto err;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++) {
spin_lock_init(&cluster_info[i].lock);
+ if (swap_cluster_alloc_table(&cluster_info[i]))
+ goto err_free;
+ }
if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE)) {
si->global_cluster = kmalloc(sizeof(*si->global_cluster),
@@ -3233,9 +3289,8 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
}
return cluster_info;
-
err_free:
- kvfree(cluster_info);
+ free_cluster_info(cluster_info, maxpages);
err:
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
@@ -3429,13 +3484,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
}
}
- error = init_swap_address_space(si->type, maxpages);
- if (error)
- goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
-
error = zswap_swapon(si->type, maxpages);
if (error)
- goto free_swap_address_space;
+ goto bad_swap_unlock_inode;
/*
* Flush any pending IO and dirty mappings before we start using this
@@ -3470,8 +3521,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
goto out;
free_swap_zswap:
zswap_swapoff(si->type);
-free_swap_address_space:
- exit_swap_address_space(si->type);
bad_swap_unlock_inode:
inode_unlock(inode);
bad_swap:
@@ -3486,7 +3535,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(swapon, const char __user *, specialfile, int, swap_flags)
spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
vfree(swap_map);
kvfree(zeromap);
- kvfree(cluster_info);
+ if (cluster_info)
+ free_cluster_info(cluster_info, maxpages);
if (inced_nr_rotate_swap)
atomic_dec(&nr_rotate_swap);
if (swap_file)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index c79c6806560b..e170c12e2065 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -730,13 +730,18 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio,
{
int refcount;
void *shadow = NULL;
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
BUG_ON(!folio_test_locked(folio));
BUG_ON(mapping != folio_mapping(folio));
- if (!folio_test_swapcache(folio))
+ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
+ ci = swap_cluster_get_and_lock_irq(folio);
+ } else {
spin_lock(&mapping->host->i_lock);
- xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
+ xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
+ }
+
/*
* The non racy check for a busy folio.
*
@@ -776,9 +781,9 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio,
if (reclaimed && !mapping_exiting(mapping))
shadow = workingset_eviction(folio, target_memcg);
- __swap_cache_del_folio(folio, swap, shadow);
+ __swap_cache_del_folio(ci, folio, swap, shadow);
memcg1_swapout(folio, swap);
- xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
+ swap_cluster_unlock_irq(ci);
put_swap_folio(folio, swap);
} else {
void (*free_folio)(struct folio *);
@@ -816,9 +821,12 @@ static int __remove_mapping(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio,
return 1;
cannot_free:
- xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
- if (!folio_test_swapcache(folio))
+ if (folio_test_swapcache(folio)) {
+ swap_cluster_unlock_irq(ci);
+ } else {
+ xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
spin_unlock(&mapping->host->i_lock);
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 12/15] mm, swap: mark swap address space ro and add context debug check
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] mm, swap: use the swap table for the swap cache and switch API Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] mm, swap: remove contention workaround for swap cache Kairui Song
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Swap cache is now backed by swap table, and the address space is not
holding any mutable data anymore. And swap cache is now protected by
the swap cluster lock, instead of the XArray lock. All access to swap
cache are wrapped by swap cache helpers. Locking is mostly handled
internally by swap cache helpers, only a few __swap_cache_* helpers
require the caller to lock the cluster by themselves.
Worth noting that, unlike XArray, the cluster lock is not IRQ safe.
The swap cache was very different compared to filemap, and now it's
completely separated from filemap. Nothing wants to mark or change
anything or do a writeback callback in IRQ.
So explicitly document this and add a debug check to avoid further
potential misuse. And mark the swap cache space as read-only to avoid
any user wrongly mixing unexpected filemap helpers with swap cache.
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
mm/swap.h | 12 +++++++++++-
mm/swap_state.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index 742db4d46d23..adcd85fa8538 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -99,6 +99,16 @@ static __always_inline struct swap_cluster_info *__swap_cluster_lock(
{
struct swap_cluster_info *ci = __swap_offset_to_cluster(si, offset);
+ /*
+ * Nothing modifies swap cache in an IRQ context. All access to
+ * swap cache is wrapped by swap_cache_* helpers, and swap cache
+ * writeback is handled outside of IRQs. Swapin or swapout never
+ * occurs in IRQ, and neither does in-place split or replace.
+ *
+ * Besides, modifying swap cache requires synchronization with
+ * swap_map, which was never IRQ safe.
+ */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(percpu_ref_is_zero(&si->users)); /* race with swapoff */
if (irq)
spin_lock_irq(&ci->lock);
@@ -192,7 +202,7 @@ void __swap_writepage(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **swap_plug);
#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT 14
#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES (1 << SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT)
#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK (SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES - 1)
-extern struct address_space swap_space;
+extern struct address_space swap_space __ro_after_init;
static inline struct address_space *swap_address_space(swp_entry_t entry)
{
return &swap_space;
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index 2558a648d671..a1478cbff384 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ static const struct address_space_operations swap_aops = {
#endif
};
-struct address_space swap_space __read_mostly = {
+/* Set swap_space as read only as swap cache is handled by swap table */
+struct address_space swap_space __ro_after_init = {
.a_ops = &swap_aops,
};
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 13/15] mm, swap: remove contention workaround for swap cache
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] mm, swap: mark swap address space ro and add context debug check Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table Kairui Song
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song,
kernel test robot
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Swap cluster setup will try to shuffle the clusters on initialization.
It was helpful to avoid contention for the swap cache space. The cluster
size (2M) was much smaller than each swap cache space (64M), so
shuffling the cluster means the allocator will try to allocate swap
slots that are in different swap cache spaces for each CPU, reducing the
chance of two CPUs using the same swap cache space, and hence reducing
the contention.
Now, swap cache is managed by swap clusters, this shuffle is pointless.
Just remove it, and clean up related macros.
This also improves the HDD swap performance as shuffling IO is a bad
idea for HDD, and now the shuffling is gone. Test have shown a ~40%
performance gain for HDD [1]:
Doing sequential swap in of 8G data using 8 processes with usemem,
average of 3 test runs:
Before: 1270.91 KB/s per process
After: 1849.54 KB/s per process
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAMgjq7AdauQ8=X0zeih2r21QoV=-WWj1hyBxLWRzq74n-C=-Ng@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202504241621.f27743ec-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
mm/swap.h | 4 ----
mm/swapfile.c | 32 ++++++++------------------------
mm/zswap.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index adcd85fa8538..fe5c20922082 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -198,10 +198,6 @@ int swap_writeout(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **swap_plug);
void __swap_writepage(struct folio *folio, struct swap_iocb **swap_plug);
/* linux/mm/swap_state.c */
-/* One swap address space for each 64M swap space */
-#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT 14
-#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES (1 << SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT)
-#define SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_MASK (SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES - 1)
extern struct address_space swap_space __ro_after_init;
static inline struct address_space *swap_address_space(swp_entry_t entry)
{
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index b183e96be289..314c5c10d3bd 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -3204,21 +3204,14 @@ static int setup_swap_map(struct swap_info_struct *si,
return 0;
}
-#define SWAP_CLUSTER_INFO_COLS \
- DIV_ROUND_UP(L1_CACHE_BYTES, sizeof(struct swap_cluster_info))
-#define SWAP_CLUSTER_SPACE_COLS \
- DIV_ROUND_UP(SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER)
-#define SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS \
- max_t(unsigned int, SWAP_CLUSTER_INFO_COLS, SWAP_CLUSTER_SPACE_COLS)
-
static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
union swap_header *swap_header,
unsigned long maxpages)
{
unsigned long nr_clusters = DIV_ROUND_UP(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
struct swap_cluster_info *cluster_info;
- unsigned long i, j, idx;
int err = -ENOMEM;
+ unsigned long i;
cluster_info = kvcalloc(nr_clusters, sizeof(*cluster_info), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cluster_info)
@@ -3267,22 +3260,13 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->frag_clusters[i]);
}
- /*
- * Reduce false cache line sharing between cluster_info and
- * sharing same address space.
- */
- for (j = 0; j < SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS; j++) {
- for (i = 0; i < DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_clusters, SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS); i++) {
- struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
- idx = i * SWAP_CLUSTER_COLS + j;
- ci = cluster_info + idx;
- if (idx >= nr_clusters)
- continue;
- if (ci->count) {
- ci->flags = CLUSTER_FLAG_NONFULL;
- list_add_tail(&ci->list, &si->nonfull_clusters[0]);
- continue;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++) {
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = &cluster_info[i];
+
+ if (ci->count) {
+ ci->flags = CLUSTER_FLAG_NONFULL;
+ list_add_tail(&ci->list, &si->nonfull_clusters[0]);
+ } else {
ci->flags = CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE;
list_add_tail(&ci->list, &si->free_clusters);
}
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
index 1b1edecde6a7..c1af782e54ec 100644
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -225,10 +225,13 @@ static bool zswap_has_pool;
* helpers and fwd declarations
**********************************/
+/* One swap address space for each 64M swap space */
+#define ZSWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT 14
+#define ZSWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES (1 << ZSWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT)
static inline struct xarray *swap_zswap_tree(swp_entry_t swp)
{
return &zswap_trees[swp_type(swp)][swp_offset(swp)
- >> SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT];
+ >> ZSWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_SHIFT];
}
#define zswap_pool_debug(msg, p) \
@@ -1674,7 +1677,7 @@ int zswap_swapon(int type, unsigned long nr_pages)
struct xarray *trees, *tree;
unsigned int nr, i;
- nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages, SWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES);
+ nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_pages, ZSWAP_ADDRESS_SPACE_PAGES);
trees = kvcalloc(nr, sizeof(*tree), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!trees) {
pr_err("alloc failed, zswap disabled for swap type %d\n", type);
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] mm, swap: remove contention workaround for swap cache Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:00 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 22:51 ` Barry Song
2025-09-24 21:51 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits Kairui Song
2025-09-16 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Hugh Dickins
15 siblings, 2 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Now swap table is cluster based, which means free clusters can free its
table since no one should modify it.
There could be speculative readers, like swap cache look up, protect
them by making them RCU protected. All swap table should be filled with
null entries before free, so such readers will either see a NULL pointer
or a null filled table being lazy freed.
On allocation, allocate the table when a cluster is used by any order.
This way, we can reduce the memory usage of large swap device
significantly.
This idea to dynamically release unused swap cluster data was initially
suggested by Chris Li while proposing the cluster swap allocator and
it suits the swap table idea very well.
Co-developed-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
---
mm/swap.h | 2 +-
mm/swap_state.c | 9 +--
mm/swap_table.h | 37 ++++++++-
mm/swapfile.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
4 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
index fe5c20922082..8d8efdf1297a 100644
--- a/mm/swap.h
+++ b/mm/swap.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct swap_cluster_info {
u16 count;
u8 flags;
u8 order;
- atomic_long_t *table; /* Swap table entries, see mm/swap_table.h */
+ atomic_long_t __rcu *table; /* Swap table entries, see mm/swap_table.h */
struct list_head list;
};
diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
index a1478cbff384..b13e9c4baa90 100644
--- a/mm/swap_state.c
+++ b/mm/swap_state.c
@@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
struct folio *folio;
for (;;) {
- swp_tb = __swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
- swp_cluster_offset(entry));
+ swp_tb = swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
+ swp_cluster_offset(entry));
if (!swp_tb_is_folio(swp_tb))
return NULL;
folio = swp_tb_to_folio(swp_tb);
@@ -115,11 +115,10 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
{
unsigned long swp_tb;
- swp_tb = __swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
- swp_cluster_offset(entry));
+ swp_tb = swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
+ swp_cluster_offset(entry));
if (swp_tb_is_shadow(swp_tb))
return swp_tb_to_shadow(swp_tb);
-
return NULL;
}
diff --git a/mm/swap_table.h b/mm/swap_table.h
index e1f7cc009701..52254e455304 100644
--- a/mm/swap_table.h
+++ b/mm/swap_table.h
@@ -2,8 +2,15 @@
#ifndef _MM_SWAP_TABLE_H
#define _MM_SWAP_TABLE_H
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include "swap.h"
+/* A typical flat array in each cluster as swap table */
+struct swap_table {
+ atomic_long_t entries[SWAPFILE_CLUSTER];
+};
+
/*
* A swap table entry represents the status of a swap slot on a swap
* (physical or virtual) device. The swap table in each cluster is a
@@ -76,22 +83,46 @@ static inline void *swp_tb_to_shadow(unsigned long swp_tb)
static inline void __swap_table_set(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
unsigned int off, unsigned long swp_tb)
{
+ atomic_long_t *table = rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true);
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
- atomic_long_set(&ci->table[off], swp_tb);
+ atomic_long_set(&table[off], swp_tb);
}
static inline unsigned long __swap_table_xchg(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
unsigned int off, unsigned long swp_tb)
{
+ atomic_long_t *table = rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true);
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
/* Ordering is guaranteed by cluster lock, relax */
- return atomic_long_xchg_relaxed(&ci->table[off], swp_tb);
+ return atomic_long_xchg_relaxed(&table[off], swp_tb);
}
static inline unsigned long __swap_table_get(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
unsigned int off)
{
+ atomic_long_t *table;
+
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
- return atomic_long_read(&ci->table[off]);
+ table = rcu_dereference_check(ci->table, lockdep_is_held(&ci->lock));
+
+ return atomic_long_read(&table[off]);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long swap_table_get(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
+ unsigned int off)
+{
+ atomic_long_t *table;
+ unsigned long swp_tb;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ table = rcu_dereference(ci->table);
+ swp_tb = table ? atomic_long_read(&table[off]) : null_to_swp_tb();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return swp_tb;
}
#endif
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 314c5c10d3bd..094e3e75849f 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
static void swap_range_alloc(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned int nr_entries);
static bool folio_swapcache_freeable(struct folio *folio);
+static void move_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci, struct list_head *list,
+ enum swap_cluster_flags new_flags);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_lock);
static unsigned int nr_swapfiles;
@@ -105,6 +108,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_avail_lock);
struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
+static struct kmem_cache *swap_table_cachep;
+
static DEFINE_MUTEX(swapon_mutex);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(proc_poll_wait);
@@ -401,10 +406,17 @@ static inline bool cluster_is_discard(struct swap_cluster_info *info)
return info->flags == CLUSTER_FLAG_DISCARD;
}
+static inline bool cluster_table_is_alloced(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+{
+ return rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, lockdep_is_held(&ci->lock));
+}
+
static inline bool cluster_is_usable(struct swap_cluster_info *ci, int order)
{
if (unlikely(ci->flags > CLUSTER_FLAG_USABLE))
return false;
+ if (!cluster_table_is_alloced(ci))
+ return false;
if (!order)
return true;
return cluster_is_empty(ci) || order == ci->order;
@@ -422,32 +434,90 @@ static inline unsigned int cluster_offset(struct swap_info_struct *si,
return cluster_index(si, ci) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
}
-static int swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+static void swap_cluster_free_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
{
- WARN_ON(ci->table);
- ci->table = kzalloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ci->table)
- return -ENOMEM;
- return 0;
+ unsigned int ci_off;
+ struct swap_table *table;
+
+ /* Only empty cluster's table is allow to be freed */
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cluster_is_empty(ci));
+ for (ci_off = 0; ci_off < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; ci_off++)
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!swp_tb_is_null(__swap_table_get(ci, ci_off)));
+ table = (void *)rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, NULL);
+
+ kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
}
-static void swap_cluster_free_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
+/*
+ * Allocate swap table for one cluster. Attempt an atomic allocation first,
+ * then fallback to sleeping allocation.
+ */
+static struct swap_cluster_info *
+swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_info_struct *si,
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
{
- unsigned int ci_off;
- unsigned long swp_tb;
+ struct swap_table *table;
- if (!ci->table)
- return;
+ /*
+ * Only cluster isolation from the allocator does table allocation.
+ * Swap allocator uses percpu clusters and holds the local lock.
+ */
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
+ lockdep_assert_held(&this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_swap_cluster)->lock);
+
+ /* The cluster must be free and was just isolated from the free list. */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(ci->flags || !cluster_is_empty(ci));
+
+ table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep,
+ __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (table) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
+ return ci;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Try a sleep allocation. Each isolated free cluster may cause
+ * a sleep allocation, but there is a limited number of them, so
+ * the potential recursive allocation is limited.
+ */
+ spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
+ if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
+ spin_unlock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
+ local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
+
+ table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep,
+ __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ /*
+ * Back to atomic context. We might have migrated to a new CPU with a
+ * usable percpu cluster. But just keep using the isolated cluster to
+ * make things easier. Migration indicates a slight change of workload
+ * so using a new free cluster might not be a bad idea, and the worst
+ * could happen with ignoring the percpu cluster is fragmentation,
+ * which is acceptable since this fallback and race is rare.
+ */
+ local_lock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
+ if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
+ spin_lock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ci->lock);
- for (ci_off = 0; ci_off < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; ci_off++) {
- swp_tb = __swap_table_get(ci, ci_off);
- if (!swp_tb_is_null(swp_tb))
- pr_err_once("swap: unclean swap space on swapoff: 0x%lx",
- swp_tb);
+ /* Nothing except this helper should touch a dangling empty cluster. */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cluster_table_is_alloced(ci))) {
+ if (table)
+ kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
+ return ci;
}
- kfree(ci->table);
- ci->table = NULL;
+ if (!table) {
+ move_cluster(si, ci, &si->free_clusters, CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE);
+ spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
+ return ci;
}
static void move_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
@@ -479,7 +549,7 @@ static void swap_cluster_schedule_discard(struct swap_info_struct *si,
static void __free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
{
- lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
+ swap_cluster_free_table(ci);
move_cluster(si, ci, &si->free_clusters, CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE);
ci->order = 0;
}
@@ -494,15 +564,11 @@ static void __free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, struct swap_cluster_info
* this returns NULL for an non-empty list.
*/
static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
- struct swap_info_struct *si, struct list_head *list)
+ struct swap_info_struct *si, struct list_head *list, int order)
{
- struct swap_cluster_info *ci, *ret = NULL;
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci, *found = NULL;
spin_lock(&si->lock);
-
- if (unlikely(!(si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK)))
- goto out;
-
list_for_each_entry(ci, list, list) {
if (!spin_trylock(&ci->lock))
continue;
@@ -514,13 +580,19 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
list_del(&ci->list);
ci->flags = CLUSTER_FLAG_NONE;
- ret = ci;
+ found = ci;
break;
}
-out:
spin_unlock(&si->lock);
- return ret;
+ if (found && !cluster_table_is_alloced(found)) {
+ /* Only an empty free cluster's swap table can be freed. */
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(list != &si->free_clusters);
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cluster_is_empty(found));
+ return swap_cluster_alloc_table(si, found);
+ }
+
+ return found;
}
/*
@@ -653,17 +725,27 @@ static void relocate_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
* added to free cluster list and its usage counter will be increased by 1.
* Only used for initialization.
*/
-static void inc_cluster_info_page(struct swap_info_struct *si,
+static int inc_cluster_info_page(struct swap_info_struct *si,
struct swap_cluster_info *cluster_info, unsigned long page_nr)
{
unsigned long idx = page_nr / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
+ struct swap_table *table;
struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
ci = cluster_info + idx;
+ if (!ci->table) {
+ table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!table)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
+ }
+
ci->count++;
VM_BUG_ON(ci->count > SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
VM_BUG_ON(ci->flags);
+
+ return 0;
}
static bool cluster_reclaim_range(struct swap_info_struct *si,
@@ -845,7 +927,7 @@ static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_list(struct swap_info_struct *si,
unsigned int found = SWAP_ENTRY_INVALID;
do {
- struct swap_cluster_info *ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, list);
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, list, order);
unsigned long offset;
if (!ci)
@@ -870,7 +952,7 @@ static void swap_reclaim_full_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si, bool force)
if (force)
to_scan = swap_usage_in_pages(si) / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
- while ((ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->full_clusters))) {
+ while ((ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->full_clusters, 0))) {
offset = cluster_offset(si, ci);
end = min(si->max, offset + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
to_scan--;
@@ -1018,6 +1100,7 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
done:
if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
spin_unlock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
+
return found;
}
@@ -1885,7 +1968,13 @@ swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int type)
/* This is called for allocating swap entry, not cache */
if (get_swap_device_info(si)) {
if (si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK) {
+ /*
+ * Grab the local lock to be complaint
+ * with swap table allocation.
+ */
+ local_lock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
offset = cluster_alloc_swap_entry(si, 0, 1);
+ local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
if (offset) {
entry = swp_entry(si->type, offset);
atomic_long_dec(&nr_swap_pages);
@@ -2679,12 +2768,21 @@ static void wait_for_allocation(struct swap_info_struct *si)
static void free_cluster_info(struct swap_cluster_info *cluster_info,
unsigned long maxpages)
{
+ struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
int i, nr_clusters = DIV_ROUND_UP(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
if (!cluster_info)
return;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++)
- swap_cluster_free_table(&cluster_info[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++) {
+ ci = cluster_info + i;
+ /* Cluster with bad marks count will have a remaining table */
+ spin_lock(&ci->lock);
+ if (rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true)) {
+ ci->count = 0;
+ swap_cluster_free_table(ci);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
+ }
kvfree(cluster_info);
}
@@ -2720,6 +2818,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
struct address_space *mapping;
struct inode *inode;
struct filename *pathname;
+ unsigned int maxpages;
int err, found = 0;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
@@ -2826,8 +2925,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
p->swap_map = NULL;
zeromap = p->zeromap;
p->zeromap = NULL;
+ maxpages = p->max;
cluster_info = p->cluster_info;
- free_cluster_info(cluster_info, p->max);
p->max = 0;
p->cluster_info = NULL;
spin_unlock(&p->lock);
@@ -2839,6 +2938,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
p->global_cluster = NULL;
vfree(swap_map);
kvfree(zeromap);
+ free_cluster_info(cluster_info, maxpages);
/* Destroy swap account information */
swap_cgroup_swapoff(p->type);
@@ -3217,11 +3317,8 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
if (!cluster_info)
goto err;
- for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++)
spin_lock_init(&cluster_info[i].lock);
- if (swap_cluster_alloc_table(&cluster_info[i]))
- goto err_free;
- }
if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE)) {
si->global_cluster = kmalloc(sizeof(*si->global_cluster),
@@ -3240,16 +3337,23 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
* See setup_swap_map(): header page, bad pages,
* and the EOF part of the last cluster.
*/
- inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, 0);
+ err = inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, 0);
+ if (err)
+ goto err;
for (i = 0; i < swap_header->info.nr_badpages; i++) {
unsigned int page_nr = swap_header->info.badpages[i];
if (page_nr >= maxpages)
continue;
- inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, page_nr);
+ err = inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, page_nr);
+ if (err)
+ goto err;
+ }
+ for (i = maxpages; i < round_up(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER); i++) {
+ err = inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, i);
+ if (err)
+ goto err;
}
- for (i = maxpages; i < round_up(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER); i++)
- inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, i);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->free_clusters);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->full_clusters);
@@ -3963,6 +4067,15 @@ static int __init swapfile_init(void)
swapfile_maximum_size = arch_max_swapfile_size();
+ /*
+ * Once a cluster is freed, it's swap table content is read
+ * only, and all swap cache readers (swap_cache_*) verifies
+ * the content before use. So it's safe to use RCU slab here.
+ */
+ swap_table_cachep = kmem_cache_create("swap_table",
+ sizeof(struct swap_table),
+ 0, SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
if (swapfile_maximum_size >= (1UL << SWP_MIG_TOTAL_BITS))
swap_migration_ad_supported = true;
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 16:01 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-16 22:30 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Hugh Dickins
15 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-16 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Cc: Kairui Song, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins,
Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
We have a cluster size of 512 slots. Each slot consumes 8 bytes in swap
table so the swap table size of each cluster is exactly one page (4K).
If that condition is true, allocate one page direct and disable the slab
cache to reduce the memory usage of swap table and avoid fragmentation.
Co-developed-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
---
mm/swap_table.h | 2 ++
mm/swapfile.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/swap_table.h b/mm/swap_table.h
index 52254e455304..ea244a57a5b7 100644
--- a/mm/swap_table.h
+++ b/mm/swap_table.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ struct swap_table {
atomic_long_t entries[SWAPFILE_CLUSTER];
};
+#define SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE (sizeof(struct swap_table) == PAGE_SIZE)
+
/*
* A swap table entry represents the status of a swap slot on a swap
* (physical or virtual) device. The swap table in each cluster is a
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 094e3e75849f..890b410d77b6 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -434,6 +434,38 @@ static inline unsigned int cluster_offset(struct swap_info_struct *si,
return cluster_index(si, ci) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
}
+static struct swap_table *swap_table_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ struct folio *folio;
+
+ if (!SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE)
+ return kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep, gfp);
+
+ folio = folio_alloc(gfp | __GFP_ZERO, 0);
+ if (folio)
+ return folio_address(folio);
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void swap_table_free_folio_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct folio *folio;
+
+ folio = page_folio(container_of(head, struct page, rcu_head));
+ folio_put(folio);
+}
+
+static void swap_table_free(struct swap_table *table)
+{
+ if (!SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE) {
+ kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ call_rcu(&(folio_page(virt_to_folio(table), 0)->rcu_head),
+ swap_table_free_folio_rcu_cb);
+}
+
static void swap_cluster_free_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
{
unsigned int ci_off;
@@ -447,7 +479,7 @@ static void swap_cluster_free_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
table = (void *)rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true);
rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, NULL);
- kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
+ swap_table_free(table);
}
/*
@@ -470,8 +502,7 @@ swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_info_struct *si,
/* The cluster must be free and was just isolated from the free list. */
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(ci->flags || !cluster_is_empty(ci));
- table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep,
- __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ table = swap_table_alloc(__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (table) {
rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
return ci;
@@ -487,8 +518,7 @@ swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_info_struct *si,
spin_unlock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
- table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep,
- __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_KERNEL);
+ table = swap_table_alloc(__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_KERNEL);
/*
* Back to atomic context. We might have migrated to a new CPU with a
@@ -506,7 +536,7 @@ swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_info_struct *si,
/* Nothing except this helper should touch a dangling empty cluster. */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cluster_table_is_alloced(ci))) {
if (table)
- kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
+ swap_table_free(table);
return ci;
}
@@ -734,7 +764,7 @@ static int inc_cluster_info_page(struct swap_info_struct *si,
ci = cluster_info + idx;
if (!ci->table) {
- table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
+ table = swap_table_alloc(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!table)
return -ENOMEM;
rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
@@ -4072,9 +4102,10 @@ static int __init swapfile_init(void)
* only, and all swap cache readers (swap_cache_*) verifies
* the content before use. So it's safe to use RCU slab here.
*/
- swap_table_cachep = kmem_cache_create("swap_table",
- sizeof(struct swap_table),
- 0, SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL);
+ if (!SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE)
+ swap_table_cachep = kmem_cache_create("swap_table",
+ sizeof(struct swap_table),
+ 0, SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL);
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
if (swapfile_maximum_size >= (1UL << SWP_MIG_TOTAL_BITS))
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I)
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 21:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2025-09-17 3:53 ` Kairui Song
15 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2025-09-16 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, 17 Sep 2025, Kairui Song wrote:
> V4 changes:
> - Patch 14: fix potential cluster leak when attemp a sleep allocation of
> swap table: Just remove the logic that check and return the percpu
> cluster, it was trying to avoid fragmentation, which wasn't very
> successfully and may not work at all if there are multiple devices.
> The fragmentation is not a serious issue and given the chance of
> hitting that race is extremely low, let's just ignore that [ Chris Meson ].
And in Patch 11 I can see that you've made an important fix to the
!folio_ref_freeze() block in __folio_migrate_mapping(): there had been a
swap_cluster_unlock(ci) which you've fixed to swap_cluster_unlock_irq(ci):
I was going to report that, with the WARNING and "BUG: sleeping function"s
it caused, but you're ahead of me.
Thanks also for fixing the shmem_replace_folio() locking and stats
update, which I'd noticed too (but never hit): looks good now.
Hugh
> - Patch 8 & 9: move some changes from Patch 9 to Patch 8 to avoid build
> error, no code change. [ Baolin Wang ]
> - Patch 9: Fix locking section issue, should protect the shmem statistic
> update with spin lock irq. Also fix an warn on condition.
> Link to V3:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250910160833.3464-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 21:59 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 22:42 ` Chris Li
2025-09-17 16:14 ` SeongJae Park
1 sibling, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-16 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:01 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
>
> Swap table is the new swap cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
> Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 +
> Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> index fb45acba16ac..828ad9b019b3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose.
> page_table_check
> remap_file_pages
> split_page_table_lock
> + swap-table
> transhuge
> unevictable-lru
> vmalloced-kernel-stacks
> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..acae6ceb4f7b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +:Author: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> +
> +==========
> +Swap Table
> +==========
> +
> +Swap table implements swap cache as a per-cluster swap cache value array.
> +
> +Swap Entry
> +----------
> +
> +A swap entry contains the information required to serve the anonymous page
> +fault.
> +
> +Swap entry is encoded as two parts: swap type and swap offset.
> +
> +The swap type indicates which swap device to use.
> +The swap offset is the offset of the swap file to read the page data from.
> +
> +Swap Cache
> +----------
> +
> +Swap cache is a map to look up folios using swap entry as the key. The result
> +value can have three possible types depending on which stage of this swap entry
> +was in.
> +
> +1. NULL: This swap entry is not used.
> +
> +2. folio: A folio has been allocated and bound to this swap entry. This is
> + the transient state of swap out or swap in. The folio data can be in
> + the folio or swap file, or both.
This doesn’t look quite right.
the folio’s data must reside within the folio itself?
The data might also be in a swap file, or not.
> +
> +3. shadow: The shadow contains the working set information of the swapped
> + out folio. This is the normal state for a swapped out page.
> +
> +Swap Table Internals
> +--------------------
> +
> +The previous swap cache is implemented by XArray. The XArray is a tree
> +structure. Each lookup will go through multiple nodes. Can we do better?
> +
> +Notice that most of the time when we look up the swap cache, we are either
> +in a swap in or swap out path. We should already have the swap cluster,
> +which contains the swap entry.
> +
> +If we have a per-cluster array to store swap cache value in the cluster.
> +Swap cache lookup within the cluster can be a very simple array lookup.
> +
> +We give such a per-cluster swap cache value array a name: the swap table.
> +
> +Each swap cluster contains 512 entries, so a swap table stores one cluster
> +worth of swap cache values, which is exactly one page. This is not
> +coincidental because the cluster size is determined by the huge page size.
> +The swap table is holding an array of pointers. The pointer has the same
> +size as the PTE. The size of the swap table should match to the second
> +last level of the page table page, exactly one page.
On a 32-bit system, I’m guessing the swap table is 2 KB, which is about
half of a page?
> +
> +With swap table, swap cache lookup can achieve great locality, simpler,
> +and faster.
> +
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 22:30 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 3:52 ` Kairui Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-16 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:02 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> We have a cluster size of 512 slots. Each slot consumes 8 bytes in swap
> table so the swap table size of each cluster is exactly one page (4K).
>
> If that condition is true, allocate one page direct and disable the slab
> cache to reduce the memory usage of swap table and avoid fragmentation.
>
> Co-developed-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
looks good to me, with just a minor nit noted below.
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
> ---
> +static void swap_table_free(struct swap_table *table)
> +{
> + if (!SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE) {
> + kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + call_rcu(&(folio_page(virt_to_folio(table), 0)->rcu_head),
> + swap_table_free_folio_rcu_cb);
> +}
Can’t it simply be:
virt_to_page(table)->rcu_head ?
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 21:59 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-16 22:42 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 23:09 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-16 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 3:00 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:01 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> >
> > Swap table is the new swap cache.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 +
> > Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > index fb45acba16ac..828ad9b019b3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose.
> > page_table_check
> > remap_file_pages
> > split_page_table_lock
> > + swap-table
> > transhuge
> > unevictable-lru
> > vmalloced-kernel-stacks
> > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..acae6ceb4f7b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +:Author: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> > +
> > +==========
> > +Swap Table
> > +==========
> > +
> > +Swap table implements swap cache as a per-cluster swap cache value array.
> > +
> > +Swap Entry
> > +----------
> > +
> > +A swap entry contains the information required to serve the anonymous page
> > +fault.
> > +
> > +Swap entry is encoded as two parts: swap type and swap offset.
> > +
> > +The swap type indicates which swap device to use.
> > +The swap offset is the offset of the swap file to read the page data from.
> > +
> > +Swap Cache
> > +----------
> > +
> > +Swap cache is a map to look up folios using swap entry as the key. The result
> > +value can have three possible types depending on which stage of this swap entry
> > +was in.
> > +
> > +1. NULL: This swap entry is not used.
> > +
> > +2. folio: A folio has been allocated and bound to this swap entry. This is
> > + the transient state of swap out or swap in. The folio data can be in
> > + the folio or swap file, or both.
>
> This doesn’t look quite right.
>
> the folio’s data must reside within the folio itself?
For swap out cases that is true. The swap in case you allocate the
folio first then read data from swap file to folio. There is a window
swap file that has the data and folio does not.
> The data might also be in a swap file, or not.
The data only in swap file is covered by "data can be in the folio or
swap file", it is an OR relationship.
I think my previous statement still stands correct considering both
swap out and swap in. Of course there is always room for improvement
to make it more clear. But folio always has the data is not true for
swap in. If you have other ways to improve it, please feel free to
suggest.
> On a 32-bit system, I’m guessing the swap table is 2 KB, which is about
> half of a page?
Yes, true. I consider that but decide to leave it out of the document.
There are a lot of other implementation details the document does not
cover, not just this aspect. This document provides a simple
abstracted view (might not cover all the detail cases). One way to
address that is add a qualification "on a 64 bit system". What do you
say? I don't want to talk about the 32 bit system having half of a
page in this document, I consider that too much detail. The 32 bit
system is pretty rare nowadays.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-16 22:51 ` Barry Song
2025-09-24 21:51 ` Chris Li
1 sibling, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-16 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:02 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Now swap table is cluster based, which means free clusters can free its
> table since no one should modify it.
>
> There could be speculative readers, like swap cache look up, protect
> them by making them RCU protected. All swap table should be filled with
> null entries before free, so such readers will either see a NULL pointer
> or a null filled table being lazy freed.
>
> On allocation, allocate the table when a cluster is used by any order.
>
> This way, we can reduce the memory usage of large swap device
> significantly.
>
> This idea to dynamically release unused swap cluster data was initially
> suggested by Chris Li while proposing the cluster swap allocator and
> it suits the swap table idea very well.
>
> Co-developed-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 22:42 ` Chris Li
@ 2025-09-16 23:09 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 23:28 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-16 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Li
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 6:42 AM Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 3:00 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:01 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Swap table is the new swap cache.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 +
> > > Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > > index fb45acba16ac..828ad9b019b3 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose.
> > > page_table_check
> > > remap_file_pages
> > > split_page_table_lock
> > > + swap-table
> > > transhuge
> > > unevictable-lru
> > > vmalloced-kernel-stacks
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..acae6ceb4f7b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> > > +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +
> > > +:Author: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> > > +
> > > +==========
> > > +Swap Table
> > > +==========
> > > +
> > > +Swap table implements swap cache as a per-cluster swap cache value array.
> > > +
> > > +Swap Entry
> > > +----------
> > > +
> > > +A swap entry contains the information required to serve the anonymous page
> > > +fault.
> > > +
> > > +Swap entry is encoded as two parts: swap type and swap offset.
> > > +
> > > +The swap type indicates which swap device to use.
> > > +The swap offset is the offset of the swap file to read the page data from.
> > > +
> > > +Swap Cache
> > > +----------
> > > +
> > > +Swap cache is a map to look up folios using swap entry as the key. The result
> > > +value can have three possible types depending on which stage of this swap entry
> > > +was in.
> > > +
> > > +1. NULL: This swap entry is not used.
> > > +
> > > +2. folio: A folio has been allocated and bound to this swap entry. This is
> > > + the transient state of swap out or swap in. The folio data can be in
> > > + the folio or swap file, or both.
> >
> > This doesn’t look quite right.
> >
> > the folio’s data must reside within the folio itself?
>
> For swap out cases that is true. The swap in case you allocate the
> folio first then read data from swap file to folio. There is a window
> swap file that has the data and folio does not.
>
> > The data might also be in a swap file, or not.
>
> The data only in swap file is covered by "data can be in the folio or
> swap file", it is an OR relationship.
>
> I think my previous statement still stands correct considering both
> swap out and swap in. Of course there is always room for improvement
> to make it more clear. But folio always has the data is not true for
> swap in. If you have other ways to improve it, please feel free to
> suggest.
I assume you’re referring to the swapin case where a folio has been
allocated and added to the swap cache, but it’s still being read and
hasn’t been updated yet?
I assume it could be something like:
The data may be in the folio or will be placed there later. It could
also reside in the swap file.
Alternatively, leave it unchanged.
>
>
> > On a 32-bit system, I’m guessing the swap table is 2 KB, which is about
> > half of a page?
>
> Yes, true. I consider that but decide to leave it out of the document.
> There are a lot of other implementation details the document does not
> cover, not just this aspect. This document provides a simple
> abstracted view (might not cover all the detail cases). One way to
> address that is add a qualification "on a 64 bit system". What do you
> say? I don't want to talk about the 32 bit system having half of a
> page in this document, I consider that too much detail. The 32 bit
> system is pretty rare nowadays.
I’d prefer that we remove all descriptions about matching PAGE_SIZE,
since we would need to double-check every case, like 16 KB or 64 KB pages.
For ARM64 with a 16 KB page size, the last-level index uses 24:14.
For ARM64 with a 64 KB page size, it uses 28:16[1]. For them, 512 entries
are not one PAGE.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/101811/0104/Translation-granule
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 23:09 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-16 23:28 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 23:47 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-16 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 4:09 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think my previous statement still stands correct considering both
> > swap out and swap in. Of course there is always room for improvement
> > to make it more clear. But folio always has the data is not true for
> > swap in. If you have other ways to improve it, please feel free to
> > suggest.
>
> I assume you’re referring to the swapin case where a folio has been
> allocated and added to the swap cache, but it’s still being read and
> hasn’t been updated yet?
Right. That is the case swapfile has the data and folio does not.
>
> I assume it could be something like:
> The data may be in the folio or will be placed there later. It could
This is for swap in only, does not describe the swap out case.
> also reside in the swap file.
Right and it did not have the same coverage about data that can be
both in the folio and swapfile. Sorry about the pedantic. If we want
to improve it, we might want to cover the same level of detail.
> Alternatively, leave it unchanged.
I think considering the swap out and swap in case, the original is
fine. The reader will need to make some effort to map to what it does
in the code, at least the description is correct.
>
> >
> >
> > > On a 32-bit system, I’m guessing the swap table is 2 KB, which is about
> > > half of a page?
> >
> > Yes, true. I consider that but decide to leave it out of the document.
> > There are a lot of other implementation details the document does not
> > cover, not just this aspect. This document provides a simple
> > abstracted view (might not cover all the detail cases). One way to
> > address that is add a qualification "on a 64 bit system". What do you
> > say? I don't want to talk about the 32 bit system having half of a
> > page in this document, I consider that too much detail. The 32 bit
> > system is pretty rare nowadays.
>
> I’d prefer that we remove all descriptions about matching PAGE_SIZE,
I am fine with that as well.
> since we would need to double-check every case, like 16 KB or 64 KB pages.
The cluster size is determined by the last to second level page table
page size. I fail to see why 16KB matters here for the cluster. Are
you saying in the 16KB page size case, the custer size is 512/4 = 128
swap entry per cluster?
> For ARM64 with a 16 KB page size, the last-level index uses 24:14.
> For ARM64 with a 64 KB page size, it uses 28:16[1]. For them, 512 entries
> are not one PAGE.
Now you got me curioused.
In your above two examples, what is the respected swap cluster swap entry size?
In other words, how much entry does one swap cluster hold?
Sorry I am not very familiar with the ARM page tables.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 23:28 ` Chris Li
@ 2025-09-16 23:47 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 16:48 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-16 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Li
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 7:29 AM Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 4:09 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I think my previous statement still stands correct considering both
> > > swap out and swap in. Of course there is always room for improvement
> > > to make it more clear. But folio always has the data is not true for
> > > swap in. If you have other ways to improve it, please feel free to
> > > suggest.
> >
> > I assume you’re referring to the swapin case where a folio has been
> > allocated and added to the swap cache, but it’s still being read and
> > hasn’t been updated yet?
>
> Right. That is the case swapfile has the data and folio does not.
>
> >
> > I assume it could be something like:
> > The data may be in the folio or will be placed there later. It could
> This is for swap in only, does not describe the swap out case.
>
> > also reside in the swap file.
>
> Right and it did not have the same coverage about data that can be
> both in the folio and swapfile. Sorry about the pedantic. If we want
> to improve it, we might want to cover the same level of detail.
>
> > Alternatively, leave it unchanged.
> I think considering the swap out and swap in case, the original is
> fine. The reader will need to make some effort to map to what it does
> in the code, at least the description is correct.
Ok.
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On a 32-bit system, I’m guessing the swap table is 2 KB, which is about
> > > > half of a page?
> > >
> > > Yes, true. I consider that but decide to leave it out of the document.
> > > There are a lot of other implementation details the document does not
> > > cover, not just this aspect. This document provides a simple
> > > abstracted view (might not cover all the detail cases). One way to
> > > address that is add a qualification "on a 64 bit system". What do you
> > > say? I don't want to talk about the 32 bit system having half of a
> > > page in this document, I consider that too much detail. The 32 bit
> > > system is pretty rare nowadays.
> >
> > I’d prefer that we remove all descriptions about matching PAGE_SIZE,
>
> I am fine with that as well.
>
> > since we would need to double-check every case, like 16 KB or 64 KB pages.
>
> The cluster size is determined by the last to second level page table
> page size. I fail to see why 16KB matters here for the cluster. Are
> you saying in the 16KB page size case, the custer size is 512/4 = 128
> swap entry per cluster?
>
> > For ARM64 with a 16 KB page size, the last-level index uses 24:14.
> > For ARM64 with a 64 KB page size, it uses 28:16[1]. For them, 512 entries
> > are not one PAGE.
>
> Now you got me curioused.
>
> In your above two examples, what is the respected swap cluster swap entry size?
> In other words, how much entry does one swap cluster hold?
>
> Sorry I am not very familiar with the ARM page tables.
Oh, my mistake—I recalculated:
For a 16 KB page size, SWAPCLUSTER_SIZE will be 2^11 = 2048, so the swap
table is 2048 * 8 = 16 KB.
For a 64 KB page size, SWAPCLUSTER_SIZE will be 2^13 = 8192, so the swap
table is 8192 * 8 = 64 KB.
This approach still seems to work, so the 32-bit system appears to be
the only exception. However, I’m not entirely sure that your description
of “the second last level” is correct. I believe it refers to the PTE,
which corresponds to the last level, not the second-to-last.
In other words, how do you define the second-to-last level page table?
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits
2025-09-16 22:30 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-17 3:52 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-17 4:41 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-17 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 6:31 AM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:02 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> >
> > We have a cluster size of 512 slots. Each slot consumes 8 bytes in swap
> > table so the swap table size of each cluster is exactly one page (4K).
> >
> > If that condition is true, allocate one page direct and disable the slab
> > cache to reduce the memory usage of swap table and avoid fragmentation.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> > Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
>
> looks good to me, with just a minor nit noted below.
>
> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Thanks
>
> > ---
> > +static void swap_table_free(struct swap_table *table)
> > +{
> > + if (!SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE) {
> > + kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + call_rcu(&(folio_page(virt_to_folio(table), 0)->rcu_head),
> > + swap_table_free_folio_rcu_cb);
> > +}
>
> Can’t it simply be:
> virt_to_page(table)->rcu_head ?
I'm not sure if we prefer folios when possible?
Either way is fine, they are identical for this use case.
> Thanks
> Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I)
2025-09-16 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Hugh Dickins
@ 2025-09-17 3:53 ` Kairui Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Kairui Song @ 2025-09-17 3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hugh Dickins
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Chris Li, Barry Song,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 5:23 AM Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2025, Kairui Song wrote:
> > V4 changes:
> > - Patch 14: fix potential cluster leak when attemp a sleep allocation of
> > swap table: Just remove the logic that check and return the percpu
> > cluster, it was trying to avoid fragmentation, which wasn't very
> > successfully and may not work at all if there are multiple devices.
> > The fragmentation is not a serious issue and given the chance of
> > hitting that race is extremely low, let's just ignore that [ Chris Meson ].
>
> And in Patch 11 I can see that you've made an important fix to the
> !folio_ref_freeze() block in __folio_migrate_mapping(): there had been a
> swap_cluster_unlock(ci) which you've fixed to swap_cluster_unlock_irq(ci):
> I was going to report that, with the WARNING and "BUG: sleeping function"s
> it caused, but you're ahead of me.
Oh thanks for pointing that out, I fixed that some time ago and forgot
to include it in the change log.
>
> Thanks also for fixing the shmem_replace_folio() locking and stats
> update, which I'd noticed too (but never hit): looks good now.
>
> Hugh
>
> > - Patch 8 & 9: move some changes from Patch 9 to Patch 8 to avoid build
> > error, no code change. [ Baolin Wang ]
> > - Patch 9: Fix locking section issue, should protect the shmem statistic
> > update with spin lock irq. Also fix an warn on condition.
> > Link to V3:
> > - https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250910160833.3464-1-ryncsn@gmail.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits
2025-09-17 3:52 ` Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-17 4:41 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 4:50 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-17 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel
> >
> > > ---
> > > +static void swap_table_free(struct swap_table *table)
> > > +{
> > > + if (!SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE) {
> > > + kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + call_rcu(&(folio_page(virt_to_folio(table), 0)->rcu_head),
> > > + swap_table_free_folio_rcu_cb);
> > > +}
> >
> > Can’t it simply be:
> > virt_to_page(table)->rcu_head ?
>
> I'm not sure if we prefer folios when possible?
Not sure either, but even Mathew still sometimes suggests using PAGE:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aLrrQDCBzaMwwmA-@casper.infradead.org/
BTW, "(folio_page(folio), 0)" looks quite strange. I mean, why is it 0
instead of 1?
Although we know it’s always one PAGE, 0 still seems strange.
>
> Either way is fine, they are identical for this use case.
>
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits
2025-09-17 4:41 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-17 4:50 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-17 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:41 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > +static void swap_table_free(struct swap_table *table)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (!SWP_TABLE_USE_PAGE) {
> > > > + kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + call_rcu(&(folio_page(virt_to_folio(table), 0)->rcu_head),
> > > > + swap_table_free_folio_rcu_cb);
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Can’t it simply be:
> > > virt_to_page(table)->rcu_head ?
> >
> > I'm not sure if we prefer folios when possible?
>
> Not sure either, but even Mathew still sometimes suggests using PAGE:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aLrrQDCBzaMwwmA-@casper.infradead.org/
>
> BTW, "(folio_page(folio), 0)" looks quite strange. I mean, why is it 0
> instead of 1?
> Although we know it’s always one PAGE, 0 still seems strange.
I mean, we should always free an entire folio, right?
It’s impossible to free just one page from a folio unless we split a THP, etc.
So it seems more correct that rcu_head should also be promoted to the folio.
/** @rcu_head: You can use this to free a folio by RCU. */
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
Definitely outside the scope of this patchset, so not a blocker :-)
>
> >
> > Either way is fine, they are identical for this use case.
> >
>
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table Kairui Song
2025-09-16 21:59 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-17 16:14 ` SeongJae Park
2025-09-17 17:12 ` Chris Li
1 sibling, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: SeongJae Park @ 2025-09-17 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: SeongJae Park, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Chris Li, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham,
Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner,
David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan,
linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:46 +0800 Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
>
> Swap table is the new swap cache.
Thank you very much for doing this great work!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
> Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 +
> Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> index fb45acba16ac..828ad9b019b3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose.
> page_table_check
> remap_file_pages
> split_page_table_lock
> + swap-table
> transhuge
> unevictable-lru
> vmalloced-kernel-stacks
The above diff is adding this great document on 'Unsorted Documentation'
section. Could we add the document on the main section? I think swap.rst on
the main section could be a good place, and wondering what others think.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-16 23:47 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-17 16:48 ` Chris Li
2025-09-17 23:37 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-17 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 4:48 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In your above two examples, what is the respected swap cluster swap entry size?
> > In other words, how much entry does one swap cluster hold?
> >
> > Sorry I am not very familiar with the ARM page tables.
>
> Oh, my mistake—I recalculated:
>
> For a 16 KB page size, SWAPCLUSTER_SIZE will be 2^11 = 2048, so the swap
> table is 2048 * 8 = 16 KB.
So my original description is correct in the sense that, the 16KB page
size, swap table is 16KB, this is not coincidental.
> For a 64 KB page size, SWAPCLUSTER_SIZE will be 2^13 = 8192, so the swap
> table is 8192 * 8 = 64 KB.
Same here. For 64 KB page size, the swap table is 64KB as you just told me.
I am just trying to give a bit of a glimpse of where I get the
intuition for swap tables.
>
> This approach still seems to work, so the 32-bit system appears to be
> the only exception. However, I’m not entirely sure that your description
> of “the second last level” is correct. I believe it refers to the PTE,
> which corresponds to the last level, not the second-to-last.
> In other words, how do you define the second-to-last level page table?
The second-to-last level page table page holds the PMD. The last level
page table holds PTE.
Cluster size is HPAGE_PMD_NR = 1<<HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
I was thinking of a PMD entry but the actual page table page it points
to is the last level.
That is a good catch. Let me see how to fix it.
What I am trying to say is that, swap table size should match to the
PTE page table page size which determines the cluster size. An
alternative to understanding the swap table is that swap table is a
shadow PTE page table containing the shadow PTE matching to the page
that gets swapped out to the swapfile. It is arranged in the swapfile
swap offset order. The intuition is simple once you find the right
angle to view it. However it might be a mouthful to explain.
I am fine with removing it, on the other hand it removes the only bit
of secret sauce which I try to give the reader a glimpse of my
intuition of the swap table.
Thanks for catching that.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-17 16:14 ` SeongJae Park
@ 2025-09-17 17:12 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-17 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: SeongJae Park
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Barry Song, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi,
Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand,
Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 9:14 AM SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:46 +0800 Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> >
> > Swap table is the new swap cache.
>
> Thank you very much for doing this great work!
I only did the prototype. Kairui did the heavy lifting.
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/mm/index.rst | 1 +
> > Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > index fb45acba16ac..828ad9b019b3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
> > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose.
> > page_table_check
> > remap_file_pages
> > split_page_table_lock
> > + swap-table
> > transhuge
> > unevictable-lru
> > vmalloced-kernel-stacks
>
> The above diff is adding this great document on 'Unsorted Documentation'
> section. Could we add the document on the main section? I think swap.rst on
> the main section could be a good place, and wondering what others think.
That is a good idea. Will do together with another minor fix reported
by Barry. I will move it after "swap.rst".
Thanks for the suggestion.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-17 16:48 ` Chris Li
@ 2025-09-17 23:37 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 23:50 ` Barry Song
2025-09-18 5:03 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 2 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-17 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Li
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
> > This approach still seems to work, so the 32-bit system appears to be
> > the only exception. However, I’m not entirely sure that your description
> > of “the second last level” is correct. I believe it refers to the PTE,
> > which corresponds to the last level, not the second-to-last.
> > In other words, how do you define the second-to-last level page table?
>
> The second-to-last level page table page holds the PMD. The last level
> page table holds PTE.
> Cluster size is HPAGE_PMD_NR = 1<<HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
> I was thinking of a PMD entry but the actual page table page it points
> to is the last level.
> That is a good catch. Let me see how to fix it.
>
> What I am trying to say is that, swap table size should match to the
> PTE page table page size which determines the cluster size. An
> alternative to understanding the swap table is that swap table is a
> shadow PTE page table containing the shadow PTE matching to the page
> that gets swapped out to the swapfile. It is arranged in the swapfile
> swap offset order. The intuition is simple once you find the right
> angle to view it. However it might be a mouthful to explain.
>
> I am fine with removing it, on the other hand it removes the only bit
> of secret sauce which I try to give the reader a glimpse of my
> intuition of the swap table.
Perhaps you could describe the swap table as similar to a PTE page table
representing the swap cache mapping.
That is correct for most 32-bit and 64-bit systems,
but not for every machine.
The only exception is a 32-bit system with a 64-bit physical address
(Large Physical Address Extension, LPAE), which uses a 4 KB PTE table
but a 2 KB swap table because the pointer is 32 bit while each page
table entry is 64 bit.
Maybe we can simply say that the number of entries in the swap table
is the same as in a PTE page table?
>
> Thanks for catching that.
>
> Chris
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-17 23:37 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-17 23:50 ` Barry Song
2025-09-18 4:50 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 5:03 ` Chris Li
1 sibling, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-17 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Li
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
> Perhaps you could describe the swap table as similar to a PTE page table
> representing the swap cache mapping.
> That is correct for most 32-bit and 64-bit systems,
> but not for every machine.
>
> The only exception is a 32-bit system with a 64-bit physical address
> (Large Physical Address Extension, LPAE), which uses a 4 KB PTE table
> but a 2 KB swap table because the pointer is 32 bit while each page
> table entry is 64 bit.
>
> Maybe we can simply say that the number of entries in the swap table
> is the same as in a PTE page table?
BTW, as Kairui mentioned, you plan to store the PFN instead of a
pointer in phase 2.
I wonder whether we need to switch to atomic64_t on systems where the
physical address is 64 bit but the virtual address is 32 bit :-)
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] mm, swap: always lock and check the swap cache folio before use
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] mm, swap: always lock and check the swap cache folio before use Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-17 23:54 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-17 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:01 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Swap cache lookup only increases the reference count of the returned
> folio. That's not enough to ensure a folio is stable in the swap
> cache, so the folio could be removed from the swap cache at any
> time. The caller should always lock and check the folio before using it.
>
> We have just documented this in kerneldoc, now introduce a helper for swap
> cache folio verification with proper sanity checks.
>
> Also, sanitize a few current users to use this convention and the new
> helper for easier debugging. They were not having observable problems
> yet, only trivial issues like wasted CPU cycles on swapoff or
> reclaiming. They would fail in some other way, but it is still better to
> always follow this convention to make things robust and make later
> commits easier to do.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-17 23:50 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-18 4:50 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-18 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 4:50 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps you could describe the swap table as similar to a PTE page table
> > representing the swap cache mapping.
> > That is correct for most 32-bit and 64-bit systems,
> > but not for every machine.
> >
> > The only exception is a 32-bit system with a 64-bit physical address
> > (Large Physical Address Extension, LPAE), which uses a 4 KB PTE table
> > but a 2 KB swap table because the pointer is 32 bit while each page
> > table entry is 64 bit.
> >
> > Maybe we can simply say that the number of entries in the swap table
> > is the same as in a PTE page table?
>
> BTW, as Kairui mentioned, you plan to store the PFN instead of a
> pointer in phase 2.
Yes, let's update the document then and only then. Otherwise the
document will be mismatching the code and confuse the reader.
>
> I wonder whether we need to switch to atomic64_t on systems where the
> physical address is 64 bit but the virtual address is 32 bit :-)
It is possible we need 64 bit for the swap cache anyway for other
reasons when we get into the later phases. Again, let's deal with it
later.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-17 23:37 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 23:50 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-18 5:03 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 7:03 ` Chris Li
1 sibling, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-18 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 4:38 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > This approach still seems to work, so the 32-bit system appears to be
> > > the only exception. However, I’m not entirely sure that your description
> > > of “the second last level” is correct. I believe it refers to the PTE,
> > > which corresponds to the last level, not the second-to-last.
> > > In other words, how do you define the second-to-last level page table?
> >
> > The second-to-last level page table page holds the PMD. The last level
> > page table holds PTE.
> > Cluster size is HPAGE_PMD_NR = 1<<HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
> > I was thinking of a PMD entry but the actual page table page it points
> > to is the last level.
> > That is a good catch. Let me see how to fix it.
> >
> > What I am trying to say is that, swap table size should match to the
> > PTE page table page size which determines the cluster size. An
> > alternative to understanding the swap table is that swap table is a
> > shadow PTE page table containing the shadow PTE matching to the page
> > that gets swapped out to the swapfile. It is arranged in the swapfile
> > swap offset order. The intuition is simple once you find the right
> > angle to view it. However it might be a mouthful to explain.
> >
> > I am fine with removing it, on the other hand it removes the only bit
> > of secret sauce which I try to give the reader a glimpse of my
> > intuition of the swap table.
>
> Perhaps you could describe the swap table as similar to a PTE page table
> representing the swap cache mapping.
Hard to qualify what is "similar", in what way it is similar.
Different readers will have different interpretations of what similar
means to them.
> That is correct for most 32-bit and 64-bit systems,
> but not for every machine.
I think I will leave it as for most 64 bit systems, the swap table
size is exactly one page table page size and that is not coincidental.
> The only exception is a 32-bit system with a 64-bit physical address
> (Large Physical Address Extension, LPAE), which uses a 4 KB PTE table
> but a 2 KB swap table because the pointer is 32 bit while each page
> table entry is 64 bit.
I feel that is a very corner case. I will leave it out of the
document. I want to present a simplified abstracted view. There is
always more detail to distract the simple abstracted view. That is why
we have physics.
> Maybe we can simply say that the number of entries in the swap table
> is the same as in a PTE page table?
Yes, that is what I want to say, for most modern 64 bit systems.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-18 5:03 ` Chris Li
@ 2025-09-18 7:03 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 8:58 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-18 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
Hi Barry,
How about this:
A swap table stores one cluster worth of swap cache values, which is
exactly one page table page on most morden 64 bit systems. This is not
coincidental because the cluster size is determined by the huge page size.
The swap table is holding an array of pointers, which have the same
size as the PTE. The size of the swap table should match the page table
page.
If that sounds OK, I will send an incremental patch to Andrew.
Chris
On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 10:03 PM Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 4:38 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > This approach still seems to work, so the 32-bit system appears to be
> > > > the only exception. However, I’m not entirely sure that your description
> > > > of “the second last level” is correct. I believe it refers to the PTE,
> > > > which corresponds to the last level, not the second-to-last.
> > > > In other words, how do you define the second-to-last level page table?
> > >
> > > The second-to-last level page table page holds the PMD. The last level
> > > page table holds PTE.
> > > Cluster size is HPAGE_PMD_NR = 1<<HPAGE_PMD_ORDER
> > > I was thinking of a PMD entry but the actual page table page it points
> > > to is the last level.
> > > That is a good catch. Let me see how to fix it.
> > >
> > > What I am trying to say is that, swap table size should match to the
> > > PTE page table page size which determines the cluster size. An
> > > alternative to understanding the swap table is that swap table is a
> > > shadow PTE page table containing the shadow PTE matching to the page
> > > that gets swapped out to the swapfile. It is arranged in the swapfile
> > > swap offset order. The intuition is simple once you find the right
> > > angle to view it. However it might be a mouthful to explain.
> > >
> > > I am fine with removing it, on the other hand it removes the only bit
> > > of secret sauce which I try to give the reader a glimpse of my
> > > intuition of the swap table.
> >
> > Perhaps you could describe the swap table as similar to a PTE page table
> > representing the swap cache mapping.
>
> Hard to qualify what is "similar", in what way it is similar.
> Different readers will have different interpretations of what similar
> means to them.
>
> > That is correct for most 32-bit and 64-bit systems,
> > but not for every machine.
>
> I think I will leave it as for most 64 bit systems, the swap table
> size is exactly one page table page size and that is not coincidental.
>
> > The only exception is a 32-bit system with a 64-bit physical address
> > (Large Physical Address Extension, LPAE), which uses a 4 KB PTE table
> > but a 2 KB swap table because the pointer is 32 bit while each page
> > table entry is 64 bit.
>
> I feel that is a very corner case. I will leave it out of the
> document. I want to present a simplified abstracted view. There is
> always more detail to distract the simple abstracted view. That is why
> we have physics.
>
> > Maybe we can simply say that the number of entries in the swap table
> > is the same as in a PTE page table?
>
> Yes, that is what I want to say, for most modern 64 bit systems.
>
> Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-18 7:03 ` Chris Li
@ 2025-09-18 8:58 ` Barry Song
2025-09-18 14:19 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-18 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Li
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 3:03 PM Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Barry,
>
> How about this:
>
> A swap table stores one cluster worth of swap cache values, which is
> exactly one page table page on most morden 64 bit systems. This is not
> coincidental because the cluster size is determined by the huge page size.
I’d phrase it as “PMD huge page,” since we also have “PUD huge page.”
> The swap table is holding an array of pointers, which have the same
> size as the PTE. The size of the swap table should match the page table
> page.
>
I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “page table page.”
My understanding is that you’re saying:
The swap table contains an array of pointers, each the same size as a PTE,
so its total size typically matches a PTE page table—one page on modern
64-bit systems.
> If that sounds OK, I will send an incremental patch to Andrew.
>
> Chris
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-18 8:58 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-18 14:19 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 21:35 ` Barry Song
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-18 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barry Song
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 1:59 AM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 3:03 PM Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Barry,
> >
> > How about this:
> >
> > A swap table stores one cluster worth of swap cache values, which is
> > exactly one page table page on most morden 64 bit systems. This is not
> > coincidental because the cluster size is determined by the huge page size.
>
> I’d phrase it as “PMD huge page,” since we also have “PUD huge page.”
Good point. Will do.
>
> > The swap table is holding an array of pointers, which have the same
> > size as the PTE. The size of the swap table should match the page table
> > page.
> >
>
> I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “page table page.”
The page that gets pointed by the page table, or the page that holds the PTE.
> My understanding is that you’re saying:
> The swap table contains an array of pointers, each the same size as a PTE,
> so its total size typically matches a PTE page table—one page on modern
> 64-bit systems.
That sounds good. Thanks for the suggestion.
I take your suggestion with some small modifications, mostly to
clarify the total size is the total size of one cluster of swap
tables. The total size of all swap tables in a swap file is much
bigger.
How about this:
A swap table is an array of pointers. Each pointer is the same size as a PTE.
The size of a swap table for one swap cluster typically matches a PTE
page table,
which is one page on modern 64-bit systems.
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-18 14:19 ` Chris Li
@ 2025-09-18 21:35 ` Barry Song
2025-09-21 0:11 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 1 reply; 44+ messages in thread
From: Barry Song @ 2025-09-18 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Li
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox,
Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang,
Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed,
Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
> > I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “page table page.”
>
> The page that gets pointed by the page table, or the page that holds the PTE.
>
> > My understanding is that you’re saying:
> > The swap table contains an array of pointers, each the same size as a PTE,
> > so its total size typically matches a PTE page table—one page on modern
> > 64-bit systems.
>
> That sounds good. Thanks for the suggestion.
> I take your suggestion with some small modifications, mostly to
> clarify the total size is the total size of one cluster of swap
> tables. The total size of all swap tables in a swap file is much
> bigger.
>
> How about this:
>
> A swap table is an array of pointers. Each pointer is the same size as a PTE.
> The size of a swap table for one swap cluster typically matches a PTE
> page table,
> which is one page on modern 64-bit systems.
Acked.
>
> Chris
Thanks
Barry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 06/15] mm, swap: rename and move some swap cluster definition and helpers
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] mm, swap: rename and move some swap cluster definition and helpers Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-19 22:02 ` Nhat Pham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Nhat Pham @ 2025-09-19 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Chris Li,
Barry Song, Baoquan He, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 9:01 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> No feature change, move cluster related definitions and helpers to
> mm/swap.h, also tidy up and add a "swap_" prefix for cluster lock/unlock
> helpers, so they can be used outside of swap files. And while at it, add
> kerneldoc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table
2025-09-18 21:35 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-21 0:11 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-21 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Kairui Song, linux-mm, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Baoquan He,
Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang, Johannes Weiner,
David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes, Zi Yan,
linux-kernel, Kairui Song, Barry Song
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1421 bytes --]
Hi Andrew,
Can you please apply this incremental fix up commit on the document
patch of the swap table series?
Just folding it into the original patch is fine.
Here is the change log:
- Move the swap table document to the mm main section. [SeongJae Park]
- Rewrite the swap table size sentence for easier to understand. [ Barry]
Thanks
Chris
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:35 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I’m not entirely sure what you mean by “page table page.”
> >
> > The page that gets pointed by the page table, or the page that holds the PTE.
> >
> > > My understanding is that you’re saying:
> > > The swap table contains an array of pointers, each the same size as a PTE,
> > > so its total size typically matches a PTE page table—one page on modern
> > > 64-bit systems.
> >
> > That sounds good. Thanks for the suggestion.
> > I take your suggestion with some small modifications, mostly to
> > clarify the total size is the total size of one cluster of swap
> > tables. The total size of all swap tables in a swap file is much
> > bigger.
> >
> > How about this:
> >
> > A swap table is an array of pointers. Each pointer is the same size as a PTE.
> > The size of a swap table for one swap cluster typically matches a PTE
> > page table,
> > which is one page on modern 64-bit systems.
>
> Acked.
>
> >
> > Chris
>
> Thanks
> Barry
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-SQUASH-docs-fix-up-for-the-swap-table-document.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2165 bytes --]
From b03a9b53dfcb1558feb01188f657340bc3414a22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 18:12:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] SQUASH: docs: fix up for the swap table document
Make swap table into the main section.
Adjust wording on the swap table size vs PTE page table size.
Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
---
| 2 +-
| 9 +++------
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--git a/Documentation/mm/index.rst b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
index 828ad9b019b3..ba6a8872849b 100644
--- a/Documentation/mm/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/mm/index.rst
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ see the :doc:`admin guide <../admin-guide/mm/index>`.
highmem
page_reclaim
swap
+ swap-table
page_cache
shmfs
oom
@@ -57,7 +58,6 @@ documentation, or deleted if it has served its purpose.
page_table_check
remap_file_pages
split_page_table_lock
- swap-table
transhuge
unevictable-lru
vmalloced-kernel-stacks
--git a/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
index acae6ceb4f7b..da10bb7a0dc3 100644
--- a/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
+++ b/Documentation/mm/swap-table.rst
@@ -50,12 +50,9 @@ Swap cache lookup within the cluster can be a very simple array lookup.
We give such a per-cluster swap cache value array a name: the swap table.
-Each swap cluster contains 512 entries, so a swap table stores one cluster
-worth of swap cache values, which is exactly one page. This is not
-coincidental because the cluster size is determined by the huge page size.
-The swap table is holding an array of pointers. The pointer has the same
-size as the PTE. The size of the swap table should match to the second
-last level of the page table page, exactly one page.
+A swap table is an array of pointers. Each pointer is the same size as a
+PTE. The size of a swap table for one swap cluster typically matches a PTE
+page table, which is one page on modern 64-bit systems.
With swap table, swap cache lookup can achieve great locality, simpler,
and faster.
--
2.51.0.470.ga7dc726c21-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table Kairui Song
2025-09-16 22:51 ` Barry Song
@ 2025-09-24 21:51 ` Chris Li
1 sibling, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-24 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Barry Song,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
Hi Kairui,
I assume there are no changes outside of swap_cluster_alloc_table(),
if there is please let me know.
I did one more pass mostly focusing on swap_cluster_alloc_table() .
Looks fine with minor Nitpicks following.
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 9:02 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Now swap table is cluster based, which means free clusters can free its
> table since no one should modify it.
>
> There could be speculative readers, like swap cache look up, protect
> them by making them RCU protected. All swap table should be filled with
> null entries before free, so such readers will either see a NULL pointer
> or a null filled table being lazy freed.
>
> On allocation, allocate the table when a cluster is used by any order.
>
> This way, we can reduce the memory usage of large swap device
> significantly.
>
> This idea to dynamically release unused swap cluster data was initially
> suggested by Chris Li while proposing the cluster swap allocator and
> it suits the swap table idea very well.
>
> Co-developed-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
> mm/swap.h | 2 +-
> mm/swap_state.c | 9 +--
> mm/swap_table.h | 37 ++++++++-
> mm/swapfile.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 4 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap.h b/mm/swap.h
> index fe5c20922082..8d8efdf1297a 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.h
> +++ b/mm/swap.h
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct swap_cluster_info {
> u16 count;
> u8 flags;
> u8 order;
> - atomic_long_t *table; /* Swap table entries, see mm/swap_table.h */
> + atomic_long_t __rcu *table; /* Swap table entries, see mm/swap_table.h */
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap_state.c b/mm/swap_state.c
> index a1478cbff384..b13e9c4baa90 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_state.c
> +++ b/mm/swap_state.c
> @@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ struct folio *swap_cache_get_folio(swp_entry_t entry)
> struct folio *folio;
>
> for (;;) {
> - swp_tb = __swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
> - swp_cluster_offset(entry));
> + swp_tb = swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
> + swp_cluster_offset(entry));
> if (!swp_tb_is_folio(swp_tb))
> return NULL;
> folio = swp_tb_to_folio(swp_tb);
> @@ -115,11 +115,10 @@ void *swap_cache_get_shadow(swp_entry_t entry)
> {
> unsigned long swp_tb;
>
> - swp_tb = __swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
> - swp_cluster_offset(entry));
> + swp_tb = swap_table_get(__swap_entry_to_cluster(entry),
> + swp_cluster_offset(entry));
> if (swp_tb_is_shadow(swp_tb))
> return swp_tb_to_shadow(swp_tb);
> -
> return NULL;
> }
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap_table.h b/mm/swap_table.h
> index e1f7cc009701..52254e455304 100644
> --- a/mm/swap_table.h
> +++ b/mm/swap_table.h
> @@ -2,8 +2,15 @@
> #ifndef _MM_SWAP_TABLE_H
> #define _MM_SWAP_TABLE_H
>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include "swap.h"
>
> +/* A typical flat array in each cluster as swap table */
> +struct swap_table {
> + atomic_long_t entries[SWAPFILE_CLUSTER];
> +};
> +
> /*
> * A swap table entry represents the status of a swap slot on a swap
> * (physical or virtual) device. The swap table in each cluster is a
> @@ -76,22 +83,46 @@ static inline void *swp_tb_to_shadow(unsigned long swp_tb)
> static inline void __swap_table_set(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> unsigned int off, unsigned long swp_tb)
> {
> + atomic_long_t *table = rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true);
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> - atomic_long_set(&ci->table[off], swp_tb);
> + atomic_long_set(&table[off], swp_tb);
> }
>
> static inline unsigned long __swap_table_xchg(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> unsigned int off, unsigned long swp_tb)
> {
> + atomic_long_t *table = rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true);
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> /* Ordering is guaranteed by cluster lock, relax */
> - return atomic_long_xchg_relaxed(&ci->table[off], swp_tb);
> + return atomic_long_xchg_relaxed(&table[off], swp_tb);
> }
>
> static inline unsigned long __swap_table_get(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> unsigned int off)
> {
> + atomic_long_t *table;
> +
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(off >= SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> - return atomic_long_read(&ci->table[off]);
> + table = rcu_dereference_check(ci->table, lockdep_is_held(&ci->lock));
> +
> + return atomic_long_read(&table[off]);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long swap_table_get(struct swap_cluster_info *ci,
> + unsigned int off)
> +{
> + atomic_long_t *table;
> + unsigned long swp_tb;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + table = rcu_dereference(ci->table);
> + swp_tb = table ? atomic_long_read(&table[off]) : null_to_swp_tb();
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return swp_tb;
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 314c5c10d3bd..094e3e75849f 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ static void swap_entries_free(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> static void swap_range_alloc(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> unsigned int nr_entries);
> static bool folio_swapcache_freeable(struct folio *folio);
> +static void move_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> + struct swap_cluster_info *ci, struct list_head *list,
> + enum swap_cluster_flags new_flags);
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_lock);
> static unsigned int nr_swapfiles;
> @@ -105,6 +108,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_avail_lock);
>
> struct swap_info_struct *swap_info[MAX_SWAPFILES];
>
> +static struct kmem_cache *swap_table_cachep;
> +
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(swapon_mutex);
>
> static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(proc_poll_wait);
> @@ -401,10 +406,17 @@ static inline bool cluster_is_discard(struct swap_cluster_info *info)
> return info->flags == CLUSTER_FLAG_DISCARD;
> }
>
> +static inline bool cluster_table_is_alloced(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> +{
> + return rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, lockdep_is_held(&ci->lock));
> +}
> +
> static inline bool cluster_is_usable(struct swap_cluster_info *ci, int order)
> {
> if (unlikely(ci->flags > CLUSTER_FLAG_USABLE))
> return false;
> + if (!cluster_table_is_alloced(ci))
> + return false;
> if (!order)
> return true;
> return cluster_is_empty(ci) || order == ci->order;
> @@ -422,32 +434,90 @@ static inline unsigned int cluster_offset(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> return cluster_index(si, ci) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
> }
>
> -static int swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> +static void swap_cluster_free_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> {
> - WARN_ON(ci->table);
> - ci->table = kzalloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * SWAPFILE_CLUSTER, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!ci->table)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - return 0;
> + unsigned int ci_off;
> + struct swap_table *table;
> +
> + /* Only empty cluster's table is allow to be freed */
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cluster_is_empty(ci));
> + for (ci_off = 0; ci_off < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; ci_off++)
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!swp_tb_is_null(__swap_table_get(ci, ci_off)));
> + table = (void *)rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, NULL);
> +
> + kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
> }
>
> -static void swap_cluster_free_table(struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> +/*
> + * Allocate swap table for one cluster. Attempt an atomic allocation first,
> + * then fallback to sleeping allocation.
> + */
> +static struct swap_cluster_info *
> +swap_cluster_alloc_table(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> + struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> {
> - unsigned int ci_off;
> - unsigned long swp_tb;
> + struct swap_table *table;
>
> - if (!ci->table)
> - return;
> + /*
> + * Only cluster isolation from the allocator does table allocation.
> + * Swap allocator uses percpu clusters and holds the local lock.
> + */
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&this_cpu_ptr(&percpu_swap_cluster)->lock);
> +
> + /* The cluster must be free and was just isolated from the free list. */
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(ci->flags || !cluster_is_empty(ci));
> +
> + table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep,
> + __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + if (table) {
Nit: this can goto the same shared exit path exit with
rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table) at the end of the function.
It looks cleaner and possibly generates better code because the
compiler doesn't generate two rcu_assign_pointer() in this function.
> + rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
> + return ci;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Try a sleep allocation. Each isolated free cluster may cause
> + * a sleep allocation, but there is a limited number of them, so
> + * the potential recursive allocation is limited.
> + */
> + spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> + if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
Nit: si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE should never change. However, it is
better to not make assumptions about it. You'd better cache this into
a local variable so that spin_unlock() and later spin_lock() are
paired.
> + spin_unlock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
> + local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
> +
> + table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep,
> + __GFP_HIGH | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + /*
> + * Back to atomic context. We might have migrated to a new CPU with a
> + * usable percpu cluster. But just keep using the isolated cluster to
> + * make things easier. Migration indicates a slight change of workload
> + * so using a new free cluster might not be a bad idea, and the worst
> + * could happen with ignoring the percpu cluster is fragmentation,
> + * which is acceptable since this fallback and race is rare.
> + */
> + local_lock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
> + if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
Nit: here you should use the cached local variable rather than testing
the !(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE) again. It is much easier to notice
that the same condition was used if using the same variable as the
test condition.
> + spin_lock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ci->lock);
>
> - for (ci_off = 0; ci_off < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; ci_off++) {
> - swp_tb = __swap_table_get(ci, ci_off);
> - if (!swp_tb_is_null(swp_tb))
> - pr_err_once("swap: unclean swap space on swapoff: 0x%lx",
> - swp_tb);
> + /* Nothing except this helper should touch a dangling empty cluster. */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cluster_table_is_alloced(ci))) {
> + if (table)
> + kmem_cache_free(swap_table_cachep, table);
> + return ci;
Nit: consider goto the same exit point for return.
Right now there is no further clean up required before returning ci.
Share the exit path, e.g. goto done label is in general better than
shortcut the return path here for complex functions.
> }
>
> - kfree(ci->table);
> - ci->table = NULL;
> + if (!table) {
> + move_cluster(si, ci, &si->free_clusters, CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE);
> + spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> + return NULL;
Nit: same for here, you can set ci = NULL then goto the done label.
> + }
> +
Nit: Might need another assign table label here.
> + rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
Nit: I would put the "done:" label here. You are welcome to use a
different label name.
> + return ci;
> }
>
> static void move_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> @@ -479,7 +549,7 @@ static void swap_cluster_schedule_discard(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>
> static void __free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, struct swap_cluster_info *ci)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_held(&ci->lock);
> + swap_cluster_free_table(ci);
> move_cluster(si, ci, &si->free_clusters, CLUSTER_FLAG_FREE);
> ci->order = 0;
> }
> @@ -494,15 +564,11 @@ static void __free_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si, struct swap_cluster_info
> * this returns NULL for an non-empty list.
> */
> static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
> - struct swap_info_struct *si, struct list_head *list)
> + struct swap_info_struct *si, struct list_head *list, int order)
> {
> - struct swap_cluster_info *ci, *ret = NULL;
> + struct swap_cluster_info *ci, *found = NULL;
>
> spin_lock(&si->lock);
> -
> - if (unlikely(!(si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK)))
> - goto out;
> -
> list_for_each_entry(ci, list, list) {
> if (!spin_trylock(&ci->lock))
> continue;
> @@ -514,13 +580,19 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *isolate_lock_cluster(
>
> list_del(&ci->list);
> ci->flags = CLUSTER_FLAG_NONE;
> - ret = ci;
> + found = ci;
> break;
> }
> -out:
> spin_unlock(&si->lock);
>
> - return ret;
> + if (found && !cluster_table_is_alloced(found)) {
> + /* Only an empty free cluster's swap table can be freed. */
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(list != &si->free_clusters);
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!cluster_is_empty(found));
> + return swap_cluster_alloc_table(si, found);
> + }
> +
> + return found;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -653,17 +725,27 @@ static void relocate_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> * added to free cluster list and its usage counter will be increased by 1.
> * Only used for initialization.
> */
> -static void inc_cluster_info_page(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> +static int inc_cluster_info_page(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> struct swap_cluster_info *cluster_info, unsigned long page_nr)
> {
> unsigned long idx = page_nr / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
> + struct swap_table *table;
> struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
>
> ci = cluster_info + idx;
> + if (!ci->table) {
> + table = kmem_cache_zalloc(swap_table_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!table)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + rcu_assign_pointer(ci->table, table);
> + }
> +
> ci->count++;
>
> VM_BUG_ON(ci->count > SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> VM_BUG_ON(ci->flags);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static bool cluster_reclaim_range(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> @@ -845,7 +927,7 @@ static unsigned int alloc_swap_scan_list(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> unsigned int found = SWAP_ENTRY_INVALID;
>
> do {
> - struct swap_cluster_info *ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, list);
> + struct swap_cluster_info *ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, list, order);
> unsigned long offset;
>
> if (!ci)
> @@ -870,7 +952,7 @@ static void swap_reclaim_full_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si, bool force)
> if (force)
> to_scan = swap_usage_in_pages(si) / SWAPFILE_CLUSTER;
>
> - while ((ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->full_clusters))) {
> + while ((ci = isolate_lock_cluster(si, &si->full_clusters, 0))) {
> offset = cluster_offset(si, ci);
> end = min(si->max, offset + SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
> to_scan--;
> @@ -1018,6 +1100,7 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
> done:
> if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE))
> spin_unlock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
> +
> return found;
> }
>
> @@ -1885,7 +1968,13 @@ swp_entry_t get_swap_page_of_type(int type)
> /* This is called for allocating swap entry, not cache */
> if (get_swap_device_info(si)) {
> if (si->flags & SWP_WRITEOK) {
> + /*
> + * Grab the local lock to be complaint
> + * with swap table allocation.
> + */
> + local_lock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
> offset = cluster_alloc_swap_entry(si, 0, 1);
> + local_unlock(&percpu_swap_cluster.lock);
> if (offset) {
> entry = swp_entry(si->type, offset);
> atomic_long_dec(&nr_swap_pages);
> @@ -2679,12 +2768,21 @@ static void wait_for_allocation(struct swap_info_struct *si)
> static void free_cluster_info(struct swap_cluster_info *cluster_info,
> unsigned long maxpages)
> {
> + struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
> int i, nr_clusters = DIV_ROUND_UP(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
>
> if (!cluster_info)
> return;
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++)
> - swap_cluster_free_table(&cluster_info[i]);
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++) {
> + ci = cluster_info + i;
> + /* Cluster with bad marks count will have a remaining table */
> + spin_lock(&ci->lock);
> + if (rcu_dereference_protected(ci->table, true)) {
> + ci->count = 0;
> + swap_cluster_free_table(ci);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&ci->lock);
> + }
> kvfree(cluster_info);
> }
>
> @@ -2720,6 +2818,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
> struct address_space *mapping;
> struct inode *inode;
> struct filename *pathname;
> + unsigned int maxpages;
> int err, found = 0;
>
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> @@ -2826,8 +2925,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
> p->swap_map = NULL;
> zeromap = p->zeromap;
> p->zeromap = NULL;
> + maxpages = p->max;
> cluster_info = p->cluster_info;
> - free_cluster_info(cluster_info, p->max);
> p->max = 0;
> p->cluster_info = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&p->lock);
> @@ -2839,6 +2938,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
> p->global_cluster = NULL;
> vfree(swap_map);
> kvfree(zeromap);
> + free_cluster_info(cluster_info, maxpages);
> /* Destroy swap account information */
> swap_cgroup_swapoff(p->type);
>
> @@ -3217,11 +3317,8 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> if (!cluster_info)
> goto err;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_clusters; i++)
> spin_lock_init(&cluster_info[i].lock);
> - if (swap_cluster_alloc_table(&cluster_info[i]))
> - goto err_free;
> - }
>
> if (!(si->flags & SWP_SOLIDSTATE)) {
> si->global_cluster = kmalloc(sizeof(*si->global_cluster),
> @@ -3240,16 +3337,23 @@ static struct swap_cluster_info *setup_clusters(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> * See setup_swap_map(): header page, bad pages,
> * and the EOF part of the last cluster.
> */
> - inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, 0);
> + err = inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, 0);
> + if (err)
> + goto err;
> for (i = 0; i < swap_header->info.nr_badpages; i++) {
> unsigned int page_nr = swap_header->info.badpages[i];
>
> if (page_nr >= maxpages)
> continue;
> - inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, page_nr);
> + err = inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, page_nr);
> + if (err)
> + goto err;
> + }
> + for (i = maxpages; i < round_up(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER); i++) {
> + err = inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, i);
> + if (err)
> + goto err;
> }
> - for (i = maxpages; i < round_up(maxpages, SWAPFILE_CLUSTER); i++)
> - inc_cluster_info_page(si, cluster_info, i);
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->free_clusters);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&si->full_clusters);
> @@ -3963,6 +4067,15 @@ static int __init swapfile_init(void)
>
> swapfile_maximum_size = arch_max_swapfile_size();
>
> + /*
> + * Once a cluster is freed, it's swap table content is read
> + * only, and all swap cache readers (swap_cache_*) verifies
> + * the content before use. So it's safe to use RCU slab here.
> + */
> + swap_table_cachep = kmem_cache_create("swap_table",
> + sizeof(struct swap_table),
> + 0, SLAB_PANIC | SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> if (swapfile_maximum_size >= (1UL << SWP_MIG_TOTAL_BITS))
> swap_migration_ad_supported = true;
> --
> 2.51.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] mm/shmem, swap: remove redundant error handling for replacing folio
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] mm/shmem, swap: remove redundant error handling for replacing folio Kairui Song
@ 2025-09-24 21:55 ` Chris Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 44+ messages in thread
From: Chris Li @ 2025-09-24 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kairui Song
Cc: linux-mm, Andrew Morton, Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Barry Song,
Baoquan He, Nhat Pham, Kemeng Shi, Baolin Wang, Ying Huang,
Johannes Weiner, David Hildenbrand, Yosry Ahmed, Lorenzo Stoakes,
Zi Yan, linux-kernel, Kairui Song
On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 9:02 AM Kairui Song <ryncsn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Shmem may replace a folio in the swap cache if the cached one doesn't
> fit the swapin's GFP zone. When doing so, shmem has already double
> checked that the swap cache folio is locked, still has the swap cache
> flag set, and contains the wanted swap entry. So it is impossible to
> fail due to an XArray mismatch. There is even a comment for that.
>
> Delete the defensive error handling path, and add a WARN_ON instead:
> if that happened, something has broken the basic principle of how the
> swap cache works, we should catch and fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Chris
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 32 +++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 077744a9e9da..dc17717e5631 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -2121,35 +2121,17 @@ static int shmem_replace_folio(struct folio **foliop, gfp_t gfp,
> /* Swap cache still stores N entries instead of a high-order entry */
> xa_lock_irq(&swap_mapping->i_pages);
> for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> - void *item = xas_load(&xas);
> -
> - if (item != old) {
> - error = -ENOENT;
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - xas_store(&xas, new);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(xas_store(&xas, new) != old);
> xas_next(&xas);
> }
> - if (!error) {
> - mem_cgroup_replace_folio(old, new);
> - shmem_update_stats(new, nr_pages);
> - shmem_update_stats(old, -nr_pages);
> - }
> +
> + mem_cgroup_replace_folio(old, new);
> + shmem_update_stats(new, nr_pages);
> + shmem_update_stats(old, -nr_pages);
> xa_unlock_irq(&swap_mapping->i_pages);
>
> - if (unlikely(error)) {
> - /*
> - * Is this possible? I think not, now that our callers
> - * check both the swapcache flag and folio->private
> - * after getting the folio lock; but be defensive.
> - * Reverse old to newpage for clear and free.
> - */
> - old = new;
> - } else {
> - folio_add_lru(new);
> - *foliop = new;
> - }
> + folio_add_lru(new);
> + *foliop = new;
>
> folio_clear_swapcache(old);
> old->private = NULL;
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 44+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-24 21:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-16 16:00 [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] docs/mm: add document for swap table Kairui Song
2025-09-16 21:59 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 22:42 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 23:09 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 23:28 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 23:47 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 16:48 ` Chris Li
2025-09-17 23:37 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 23:50 ` Barry Song
2025-09-18 4:50 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 5:03 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 7:03 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 8:58 ` Barry Song
2025-09-18 14:19 ` Chris Li
2025-09-18 21:35 ` Barry Song
2025-09-21 0:11 ` Chris Li
2025-09-17 16:14 ` SeongJae Park
2025-09-17 17:12 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mm, swap: use unified helper for swap cache look up Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] mm, swap: fix swap cache index error when retrying reclaim Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] mm, swap: check page poison flag after locking it Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] mm, swap: always lock and check the swap cache folio before use Kairui Song
2025-09-17 23:54 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] mm, swap: rename and move some swap cluster definition and helpers Kairui Song
2025-09-19 22:02 ` Nhat Pham
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] mm, swap: tidy up swap device and cluster info helpers Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] mm, swap: cleanup swap cache API and add kerneldoc Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] mm/shmem, swap: remove redundant error handling for replacing folio Kairui Song
2025-09-24 21:55 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] mm, swap: wrap swap cache replacement with a helper Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] mm, swap: use the swap table for the swap cache and switch API Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] mm, swap: mark swap address space ro and add context debug check Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] mm, swap: remove contention workaround for swap cache Kairui Song
2025-09-16 16:00 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] mm, swap: implement dynamic allocation of swap table Kairui Song
2025-09-16 22:51 ` Barry Song
2025-09-24 21:51 ` Chris Li
2025-09-16 16:01 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] mm, swap: use a single page for swap table when the size fits Kairui Song
2025-09-16 22:30 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 3:52 ` Kairui Song
2025-09-17 4:41 ` Barry Song
2025-09-17 4:50 ` Barry Song
2025-09-16 21:22 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] mm, swap: introduce swap table as swap cache (phase I) Hugh Dickins
2025-09-17 3:53 ` Kairui Song
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).