linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
To: chrisl@kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>,
	 Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
	 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] mm: swap: allow cache reclaim to skip slot cache
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 18:38:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4zsUCN2vgN6kgPmWZiORgH2d9g8h9kLBYsL+hVQRZhHCg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240730-swap-allocator-v5-6-cb9c148b9297@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 2:49 PM <chrisl@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
>
> Currently we free the reclaimed slots through slot cache even
> if the slot is required to be empty immediately. As a result
> the reclaim caller will see the slot still occupied even after a
> successful reclaim, and need to keep reclaiming until slot cache
> get flushed. This caused ineffective or over reclaim when SWAP is
> under stress.
>
> So introduce a new flag allowing the slot to be emptied bypassing
> the slot cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> ---
>  mm/swapfile.c | 152 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 9b63b2262cc2..4c0fc0409d3c 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -53,8 +53,15 @@
>  static bool swap_count_continued(struct swap_info_struct *, pgoff_t,
>                                  unsigned char);
>  static void free_swap_count_continuations(struct swap_info_struct *);
> +static void swap_entry_range_free(struct swap_info_struct *si, swp_entry_t entry,
> +                                 unsigned int nr_pages);
>  static void swap_range_alloc(struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset,
>                              unsigned int nr_entries);
> +static bool folio_swapcache_freeable(struct folio *folio);
> +static struct swap_cluster_info *lock_cluster_or_swap_info(
> +               struct swap_info_struct *si, unsigned long offset);
> +static void unlock_cluster_or_swap_info(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> +                                       struct swap_cluster_info *ci);
>
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(swap_lock);
>  static unsigned int nr_swapfiles;
> @@ -129,8 +136,25 @@ static inline unsigned char swap_count(unsigned char ent)
>   * corresponding page
>   */
>  #define TTRS_UNMAPPED          0x2
> -/* Reclaim the swap entry if swap is getting full*/
> +/* Reclaim the swap entry if swap is getting full */
>  #define TTRS_FULL              0x4
> +/* Reclaim directly, bypass the slot cache and don't touch device lock */
> +#define TTRS_DIRECT            0x8
> +
> +static bool swap_is_has_cache(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> +                             unsigned long offset, int nr_pages)
> +{
> +       unsigned char *map = si->swap_map + offset;
> +       unsigned char *map_end = map + nr_pages;
> +
> +       do {
> +               VM_BUG_ON(!(*map & SWAP_HAS_CACHE));
> +               if (*map != SWAP_HAS_CACHE)
> +                       return false;
> +       } while (++map < map_end);
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
>
>  /*
>   * returns number of pages in the folio that backs the swap entry. If positive,
> @@ -141,12 +165,22 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>                                  unsigned long offset, unsigned long flags)
>  {
>         swp_entry_t entry = swp_entry(si->type, offset);
> +       struct address_space *address_space = swap_address_space(entry);
> +       struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
>         struct folio *folio;
> -       int ret = 0;
> +       int ret, nr_pages;
> +       bool need_reclaim;
>
> -       folio = filemap_get_folio(swap_address_space(entry), swap_cache_index(entry));
> +       folio = filemap_get_folio(address_space, swap_cache_index(entry));
>         if (IS_ERR(folio))
>                 return 0;
> +
> +       /* offset could point to the middle of a large folio */
> +       entry = folio->swap;
> +       offset = swp_offset(entry);
> +       nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +       ret = -nr_pages;
> +
>         /*
>          * When this function is called from scan_swap_map_slots() and it's
>          * called by vmscan.c at reclaiming folios. So we hold a folio lock
> @@ -154,14 +188,50 @@ static int __try_to_reclaim_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>          * case and you should use folio_free_swap() with explicit folio_lock()
>          * in usual operations.
>          */
> -       if (folio_trylock(folio)) {
> -               if ((flags & TTRS_ANYWAY) ||
> -                   ((flags & TTRS_UNMAPPED) && !folio_mapped(folio)) ||
> -                   ((flags & TTRS_FULL) && mem_cgroup_swap_full(folio)))
> -                       ret = folio_free_swap(folio);
> -               folio_unlock(folio);
> +       if (!folio_trylock(folio))
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       need_reclaim = ((flags & TTRS_ANYWAY) ||
> +                       ((flags & TTRS_UNMAPPED) && !folio_mapped(folio)) ||
> +                       ((flags & TTRS_FULL) && mem_cgroup_swap_full(folio)));
> +       if (!need_reclaim || !folio_swapcache_freeable(folio))
> +               goto out_unlock;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * It's safe to delete the folio from swap cache only if the folio's
> +        * swap_map is HAS_CACHE only, which means the slots have no page table
> +        * reference or pending writeback, and can't be allocated to others.
> +        */
> +       ci = lock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, offset);
> +       need_reclaim = swap_is_has_cache(si, offset, nr_pages);
> +       unlock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, ci);
> +       if (!need_reclaim)
> +               goto out_unlock;
> +
> +       if (!(flags & TTRS_DIRECT)) {
> +               /* Free through slot cache */
> +               delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
> +               folio_set_dirty(folio);
> +               ret = nr_pages;
> +               goto out_unlock;
>         }
> -       ret = ret ? folio_nr_pages(folio) : -folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> +       xa_lock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
> +       __delete_from_swap_cache(folio, entry, NULL);
> +       xa_unlock_irq(&address_space->i_pages);
> +       folio_ref_sub(folio, nr_pages);
> +       folio_set_dirty(folio);
> +
> +       spin_lock(&si->lock);
> +       /* Only sinple page folio can be backed by zswap */
> +       if (!nr_pages)
> +               zswap_invalidate(entry);

I am trying to figure out if I am mad :-)  Does nr_pages == 0 means single
page folio?

> +       swap_entry_range_free(si, entry, nr_pages);
> +       spin_unlock(&si->lock);
> +       ret = nr_pages;
> +out_unlock:
> +       folio_unlock(folio);
> +out:
>         folio_put(folio);
>         return ret;
>  }
> @@ -903,7 +973,7 @@ static int scan_swap_map_slots(struct swap_info_struct *si,
>         if (vm_swap_full() && si->swap_map[offset] == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
>                 int swap_was_freed;
>                 spin_unlock(&si->lock);
> -               swap_was_freed = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY);
> +               swap_was_freed = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset, TTRS_ANYWAY | TTRS_DIRECT);
>                 spin_lock(&si->lock);
>                 /* entry was freed successfully, try to use this again */
>                 if (swap_was_freed > 0)
> @@ -1340,9 +1410,6 @@ void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
>         unsigned long offset = swp_offset(entry);
>         struct swap_cluster_info *ci;
>         struct swap_info_struct *si;
> -       unsigned char *map;
> -       unsigned int i, free_entries = 0;
> -       unsigned char val;
>         int size = 1 << swap_entry_order(folio_order(folio));
>
>         si = _swap_info_get(entry);
> @@ -1350,23 +1417,14 @@ void put_swap_folio(struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t entry)
>                 return;
>
>         ci = lock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, offset);
> -       if (size > 1) {
> -               map = si->swap_map + offset;
> -               for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> -                       val = map[i];
> -                       VM_BUG_ON(!(val & SWAP_HAS_CACHE));
> -                       if (val == SWAP_HAS_CACHE)
> -                               free_entries++;
> -               }
> -               if (free_entries == size) {
> -                       unlock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, ci);
> -                       spin_lock(&si->lock);
> -                       swap_entry_range_free(si, entry, size);
> -                       spin_unlock(&si->lock);
> -                       return;
> -               }
> +       if (size > 1 && swap_is_has_cache(si, offset, size)) {
> +               unlock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, ci);
> +               spin_lock(&si->lock);
> +               swap_entry_range_free(si, entry, size);
> +               spin_unlock(&si->lock);
> +               return;
>         }
> -       for (i = 0; i < size; i++, entry.val++) {
> +       for (int i = 0; i < size; i++, entry.val++) {
>                 if (!__swap_entry_free_locked(si, offset + i, SWAP_HAS_CACHE)) {
>                         unlock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, ci);
>                         free_swap_slot(entry);
> @@ -1526,16 +1584,7 @@ static bool folio_swapped(struct folio *folio)
>         return swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(si, entry, folio_order(folio));
>  }
>
> -/**
> - * folio_free_swap() - Free the swap space used for this folio.
> - * @folio: The folio to remove.
> - *
> - * If swap is getting full, or if there are no more mappings of this folio,
> - * then call folio_free_swap to free its swap space.
> - *
> - * Return: true if we were able to release the swap space.
> - */
> -bool folio_free_swap(struct folio *folio)
> +static bool folio_swapcache_freeable(struct folio *folio)
>  {
>         VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
>
> @@ -1543,8 +1592,6 @@ bool folio_free_swap(struct folio *folio)
>                 return false;
>         if (folio_test_writeback(folio))
>                 return false;
> -       if (folio_swapped(folio))
> -               return false;
>
>         /*
>          * Once hibernation has begun to create its image of memory,
> @@ -1564,6 +1611,25 @@ bool folio_free_swap(struct folio *folio)
>         if (pm_suspended_storage())
>                 return false;
>
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * folio_free_swap() - Free the swap space used for this folio.
> + * @folio: The folio to remove.
> + *
> + * If swap is getting full, or if there are no more mappings of this folio,
> + * then call folio_free_swap to free its swap space.
> + *
> + * Return: true if we were able to release the swap space.
> + */
> +bool folio_free_swap(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> +       if (!folio_swapcache_freeable(folio))
> +               return false;
> +       if (folio_swapped(folio))
> +               return false;
> +
>         delete_from_swap_cache(folio);
>         folio_set_dirty(folio);
>         return true;
> @@ -1640,7 +1706,7 @@ void free_swap_and_cache_nr(swp_entry_t entry, int nr)
>                          * to the next boundary.
>                          */
>                         nr = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset,
> -                                             TTRS_UNMAPPED | TTRS_FULL);
> +                                                  TTRS_UNMAPPED | TTRS_FULL);
>                         if (nr == 0)
>                                 nr = 1;
>                         else if (nr < 0)
>
> --
> 2.46.0.rc1.232.g9752f9e123-goog
>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-03 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-31  6:49 [PATCH v5 0/9] mm: swap: mTHP swap allocator base on swap cluster order Chris Li
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] mm: swap: swap cluster switch to double link list Chris Li
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] mm: swap: mTHP allocate swap entries from nonfull list Chris Li
     [not found]   ` <87bk23250r.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2024-08-16  8:01     ` Chris Li
2024-08-19  8:08       ` Huang, Ying
2024-08-26 21:26         ` Chris Li
2024-09-09  7:19           ` Huang, Ying
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] mm: swap: separate SSD allocation from scan_swap_map_slots() Chris Li
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] mm: swap: clean up initialization helper chrisl
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] mm: swap: skip slot cache on freeing for mTHP chrisl
2024-08-03  9:11   ` Barry Song
2024-08-03 10:57     ` Barry Song
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] mm: swap: allow cache reclaim to skip slot cache chrisl
2024-08-03 10:38   ` Barry Song [this message]
2024-08-03 12:18     ` Kairui Song
2024-08-04 18:06       ` Chris Li
2024-08-05  1:53         ` Barry Song
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] mm: swap: add a fragment cluster list chrisl
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] mm: swap: relaim the cached parts that got scanned chrisl
2024-07-31  6:49 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] mm: swap: add a adaptive full cluster cache reclaim chrisl
2024-08-01  9:14 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] mm: swap: mTHP swap allocator base on swap cluster order David Hildenbrand
2024-08-01  9:59   ` Kairui Song
2024-08-01 10:06     ` Kairui Song
     [not found]     ` <87le17z9zr.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2024-08-16  7:36       ` Chris Li
2024-08-17 17:47         ` Kairui Song
     [not found] ` <87h6bw3gxl.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
     [not found]   ` <CACePvbXH8b9SOePQ-Ld_UBbcAdJ3gdYtEkReMto5Hbq9WAL7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <87sevfza3w.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2024-08-16  7:47       ` Chris Li
2024-08-18 16:59         ` Kairui Song
2024-08-19  8:27           ` Huang, Ying
2024-08-19  8:47             ` Kairui Song
2024-08-19 21:27               ` Chris Li
2024-08-19  8:39         ` Huang, Ying
2024-09-02  1:20 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGsJ_4zsUCN2vgN6kgPmWZiORgH2d9g8h9kLBYsL+hVQRZhHCg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).