From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx202.postini.com [74.125.245.202]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F27E86B00E2 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:13:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m15so1356314wgh.3 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 03:13:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1364192494-22185-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> From: Michael Kerrisk Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 12:12:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] mm: Per process reclaim Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , linux-mm , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , Sangseok Lee , Michael Kerrisk-manpages > However, the interface is a quite blunt instrument. Would there be any > virtue in extending it so that an address range could be written to Here, I did mean to say "an *optional* address range. Thanks, Michael -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org