From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgg@nvidia.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, tjmercier@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
surenb@google.com, mkoutny@suse.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] mm: Introduce a cgroup to limit the amount of locked and pinned memory
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 11:49:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZcZ2mzEAv5x5TQk8of9A7w2p_fY3dGJAM29sXPvS7_RA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0vblzf3.fsf@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:24 AM Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>
> Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 5:07 PM Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:43 PM Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Having large amounts of unmovable or unreclaimable memory in a system
> >> >> can lead to system instability due to increasing the likelihood of
> >> >> encountering out-of-memory conditions. Therefore it is desirable to
> >> >> limit the amount of memory users can lock or pin.
> >> >>
> >> >> From userspace such limits can be enforced by setting
> >> >> RLIMIT_MEMLOCK. However there is no standard method that drivers and
> >> >> other in-kernel users can use to check and enforce this limit.
> >> >>
> >> >> This has lead to a large number of inconsistencies in how limits are
> >> >> enforced. For example some drivers will use mm->locked_mm while others
> >> >> will use mm->pinned_mm or user->locked_mm. It is therefore possible to
> >> >> have up to three times RLIMIT_MEMLOCKED pinned.
> >> >>
> >> >> Having pinned memory limited per-task also makes it easy for users to
> >> >> exceed the limit. For example drivers that pin memory with
> >> >> pin_user_pages() it tends to remain pinned after fork. To deal with
> >> >> this and other issues this series introduces a cgroup for tracking and
> >> >> limiting the number of pages pinned or locked by tasks in the group.
> >> >>
> >> >> However the existing behaviour with regards to the rlimit needs to be
> >> >> maintained. Therefore the lesser of the two limits is
> >> >> enforced. Furthermore having CAP_IPC_LOCK usually bypasses the rlimit,
> >> >> but this bypass is not allowed for the cgroup.
> >> >>
> >> >> The first part of this series converts existing drivers which
> >> >> open-code the use of locked_mm/pinned_mm over to a common interface
> >> >> which manages the refcounts of the associated task/mm/user
> >> >> structs. This ensures accounting of pages is consistent and makes it
> >> >> easier to add charging of the cgroup.
> >> >>
> >> >> The second part of the series adds the cgroup and converts core mm
> >> >> code such as mlock over to charging the cgroup before finally
> >> >> introducing some selftests.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I didn't go through the entire series, so apologies if this was
> >> > mentioned somewhere, but do you mind elaborating on why this is added
> >> > as a separate cgroup controller rather than an extension of the memory
> >> > cgroup controller?
> >>
> >> One of my early prototypes actually did add this to the memcg
> >> controller. However pinned pages fall under their own limit, and we
> >> wanted to always account pages to the cgroup of the task using the
> >> driver rather than say folio_memcg(). So adding it to memcg didn't seem
> >> to have much benefit as we didn't end up using any of the infrastructure
> >> provided by memcg. Hence I thought it was clearer to just add it as it's
> >> own controller.
> >
> > To clarify, you account and limit pinned memory based on the cgroup of
> > the process pinning the pages, not based on the cgroup that the pages
> > are actually charged to? Is my understanding correct?
>
> That's correct.
Interesting.
>
> > IOW, you limit the amount of memory that processes in a cgroup can
> > pin, not the amount of memory charged to a cgroup that can be pinned?
>
> Right, that's a good clarification which I might steal and add to the
> cover letter.
Feel free to :)
Please also clarify this in the code/docs. Glancing through the
patches I was asking myself multiple times why this is not
"memory.pinned.[current/max]" or similar.
>
> >>
> >> - Alistair
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> As I don't have access to systems with all the various devices I
> >> >> haven't been able to test all driver changes. Any help there would be
> >> >> appreciated.
> >> >>
> >> >> Alistair Popple (19):
> >> >> mm: Introduce vm_account
> >> >> drivers/vhost: Convert to use vm_account
> >> >> drivers/vdpa: Convert vdpa to use the new vm_structure
> >> >> infiniband/umem: Convert to use vm_account
> >> >> RMDA/siw: Convert to use vm_account
> >> >> RDMA/usnic: convert to use vm_account
> >> >> vfio/type1: Charge pinned pages to pinned_vm instead of locked_vm
> >> >> vfio/spapr_tce: Convert accounting to pinned_vm
> >> >> io_uring: convert to use vm_account
> >> >> net: skb: Switch to using vm_account
> >> >> xdp: convert to use vm_account
> >> >> kvm/book3s_64_vio: Convert account_locked_vm() to vm_account_pinned()
> >> >> fpga: dfl: afu: convert to use vm_account
> >> >> mm: Introduce a cgroup for pinned memory
> >> >> mm/util: Extend vm_account to charge pages against the pin cgroup
> >> >> mm/util: Refactor account_locked_vm
> >> >> mm: Convert mmap and mlock to use account_locked_vm
> >> >> mm/mmap: Charge locked memory to pins cgroup
> >> >> selftests/vm: Add pins-cgroup selftest for mlock/mmap
> >> >>
> >> >> MAINTAINERS | 8 +-
> >> >> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 10 +-
> >> >> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/iommu_api.c | 29 +--
> >> >> drivers/fpga/dfl-afu-dma-region.c | 11 +-
> >> >> drivers/fpga/dfl-afu.h | 1 +-
> >> >> drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 16 +-
> >> >> drivers/infiniband/core/umem_odp.c | 6 +-
> >> >> drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c | 13 +-
> >> >> drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.h | 1 +-
> >> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h | 2 +-
> >> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c | 20 +--
> >> >> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 15 +-
> >> >> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_user/vduse_dev.c | 20 +--
> >> >> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 15 +-
> >> >> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 59 +----
> >> >> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 9 +-
> >> >> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 2 +-
> >> >> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 1 +-
> >> >> include/linux/cgroup.h | 20 ++-
> >> >> include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h | 4 +-
> >> >> include/linux/io_uring_types.h | 3 +-
> >> >> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +-
> >> >> include/linux/mm.h | 5 +-
> >> >> include/linux/mm_types.h | 88 ++++++++-
> >> >> include/linux/skbuff.h | 6 +-
> >> >> include/net/sock.h | 2 +-
> >> >> include/net/xdp_sock.h | 2 +-
> >> >> include/rdma/ib_umem.h | 1 +-
> >> >> io_uring/io_uring.c | 20 +--
> >> >> io_uring/notif.c | 4 +-
> >> >> io_uring/notif.h | 10 +-
> >> >> io_uring/rsrc.c | 38 +---
> >> >> io_uring/rsrc.h | 9 +-
> >> >> mm/Kconfig | 11 +-
> >> >> mm/Makefile | 1 +-
> >> >> mm/internal.h | 2 +-
> >> >> mm/mlock.c | 76 +------
> >> >> mm/mmap.c | 76 +++----
> >> >> mm/mremap.c | 54 +++--
> >> >> mm/pins_cgroup.c | 273 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> >> mm/secretmem.c | 6 +-
> >> >> mm/util.c | 196 +++++++++++++++--
> >> >> net/core/skbuff.c | 47 +---
> >> >> net/rds/message.c | 9 +-
> >> >> net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 38 +--
> >> >> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 1 +-
> >> >> tools/testing/selftests/vm/pins-cgroup.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> >> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +-
> >> >> 48 files changed, 1114 insertions(+), 401 deletions(-)
> >> >> create mode 100644 mm/pins_cgroup.c
> >> >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/pins-cgroup.c
> >> >>
> >> >> base-commit: 2241ab53cbb5cdb08a6b2d4688feb13971058f65
> >> >> --
> >> >> git-series 0.9.1
> >> >>
> >>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-24 5:42 [RFC PATCH 00/19] mm: Introduce a cgroup to limit the amount of locked and pinned memory Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 01/19] mm: Introduce vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-01-24 14:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 11:36 ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-31 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 02/19] drivers/vhost: Convert to use vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-30 10:43 ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 03/19] drivers/vdpa: Convert vdpa to use the new vm_structure Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 04/19] infiniband/umem: Convert to use vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 05/19] RMDA/siw: " Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 14:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 15:22 ` Bernard Metzler
2023-01-24 15:56 ` Bernard Metzler
2023-01-30 11:34 ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-30 13:27 ` Bernard Metzler
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 06/19] RDMA/usnic: convert " Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 14:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 11:10 ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 07/19] vfio/type1: Charge pinned pages to pinned_vm instead of locked_vm Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 08/19] vfio/spapr_tce: Convert accounting to pinned_vm Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 09/19] io_uring: convert to use vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 14:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 11:12 ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-30 13:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 10/19] net: skb: Switch to using vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 14:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-30 11:17 ` Alistair Popple
2023-02-06 4:36 ` Alistair Popple
2023-02-06 13:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 11/19] xdp: convert to use vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 12/19] kvm/book3s_64_vio: Convert account_locked_vm() to vm_account_pinned() Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 13/19] fpga: dfl: afu: convert to use vm_account Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 14/19] mm: Introduce a cgroup for pinned memory Alistair Popple
2023-01-27 21:44 ` Tejun Heo
2023-01-30 13:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 15/19] mm/util: Extend vm_account to charge pages against the pin cgroup Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 16/19] mm/util: Refactor account_locked_vm Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 17/19] mm: Convert mmap and mlock to use account_locked_vm Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 18/19] mm/mmap: Charge locked memory to pins cgroup Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 5:42 ` [RFC PATCH 19/19] selftests/vm: Add pins-cgroup selftest for mlock/mmap Alistair Popple
2023-01-24 18:26 ` [RFC PATCH 00/19] mm: Introduce a cgroup to limit the amount of locked and pinned memory Yosry Ahmed
2023-01-31 0:54 ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-31 5:14 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-01-31 11:22 ` Alistair Popple
2023-01-31 19:49 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2023-01-24 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-31 14:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 14:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-31 14:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-31 14:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-01-31 14:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJD7tkZcZ2mzEAv5x5TQk8of9A7w2p_fY3dGJAM29sXPvS7_RA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).