linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>
To: Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, yuzhao@google.com,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev,  mhocko@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, kinseyho@google.com,
	 hannes@cmpxchg.org, gthelen@google.com, david@redhat.com,
	 axelrasmussen@google.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mglru: Update MG-LRU proactive reclaim statistics only to memcg
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:18:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJj2-QFNvw2dMQtpZt1nHjKYdJWCH_=w2=2RWLL6m__MBb6KpQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250717082845.34673-1-jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>

Hi Hao,

On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:29 AM Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>
>
> Users can use /sys/kernel/debug/lru_gen to trigger proactive memory reclaim
> of a specified memcg. Currently, statistics such as pgrefill, pgscan and
> pgsteal will be updated to the /proc/vmstat system memory statistics.

This is a debugfs interface and it's not meant for use in production
or provide a stable ABI. Does memory.reclaim not work for your needs?

I'm not against the change; I just hope you don't depend on it
continuing to exist/behave a certain way.

Shakeel's comment is accurate. The lru_gen interface uses the internal
memcg id which is not usually used to interface with the userspace.
Reading this file does show the cgroup path and memcg id association.

>
> This will confuse some system memory pressure monitoring tools, making
> it difficult to determine whether pgscan and pgsteal are caused by
> system-level pressure or by proactive memory reclaim of some specific
> memory cgroup.
>
> Therefore, make this interface behave similarly to memory.reclaim.
> Update proactive memory reclaim statistics only to its memory cgroup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao1@lixiang.com>

The patch looks okay to me too.

Thanks,
Yuanchu


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-17 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-17  8:28 [PATCH] mm/mglru: Update MG-LRU proactive reclaim statistics only to memcg Hao Jia
2025-07-17 19:47 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-07-18  3:09   ` Hao Jia
2025-07-17 20:18 ` Yuanchu Xie [this message]
2025-07-18  3:30   ` Hao Jia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJj2-QFNvw2dMQtpZt1nHjKYdJWCH_=w2=2RWLL6m__MBb6KpQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=yuanchu@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jiahao.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiahao1@lixiang.com \
    --cc=kinseyho@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).