From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-23.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5623C4338F for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0E260F41 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:19:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5A0E260F41 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8A9738D0002; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:19:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 85A326B0073; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:19:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 76F828D0002; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:19:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0226.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.226]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6CA6B0072 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 13:19:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD74824999B for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:19:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78434430144.09.4E3B400 Received: from mail-yb1-f176.google.com (mail-yb1-f176.google.com [209.85.219.176]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6B9D014D13 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f176.google.com with SMTP id b133so4859563ybg.4 for ; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:19:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ease6Bm6+dYO/uI5+kt9cx0YuwGkjF//n2DwGz99/N8=; b=TKDsSCcLpNBZT1j0QmGrbeKuBdTl/zfuIZXU6+MkSTkD7Ahdq5p9NgaW7hh9Cp99l2 MS2VP4Gj46jIc3wOwMJUGT02Otc+5TQui50zqeXhcAvOSZNoxd7kOQCZqb+g9GnTto5W j2wylHxy7k5LkGkku8iHp/tUK/0w3ASWtR/IkF/XruCEOrGJPymWtUy/GZzHRmNNN6LY X8WVAs4CJywuFTQ70SvMhrLia7ri0lqA+vMNT6Oc2OMVRUpU6up9F+lt4AY9aakKalvN PCOdJXGAhDX/O+/egvR8DDnb6AjysMtWl6SK73TybIfBrJ/kh+eyxdQvP1BN1j9ax8Rk 5emw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ease6Bm6+dYO/uI5+kt9cx0YuwGkjF//n2DwGz99/N8=; b=Qai21wLYvHyiBriDU+OaObxbhqd9wCVaA7l40VCjG/KH4B9/LcBm8jDdA4LVR/JVaH hVt9IZEmjKuTe0nY3uhPPUkBL3hcma+NygJBgElBJ/n/rR1jODbm5ubJ9zpBGuVn62Nd 7Pu5RMGCx0meT5PEzugVfMKqXPT3C9ULiXxhcGKaXjQhS40nGFCP5u7VJOHU65v+krzQ gabhoEsFbLb4OoYMeVpMdM3vYrx6br+o/oKfU/hXPp7+BamQXG/RPYIAR/cD8owNU9dS /JNkA/FC3dbubQXF6ZcZAODtTzu+EJ8Tv65gkEJWtVpE3C0ce67q5EpOx9j9W1ryZ4nf KRGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xpNCBTZ0iiRcXn8nJ0RYwsTtnuZy4x6JetAkWJYsn4+myFTM9 nA9Ipe5vC16Pqg37OR+fSnrMP8frDBEL+KvGm5G0GA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJ9Go27O6MYURKg3BsXlQyfpQgLOUbfQkaxflJgO/w1vwhSpIZOsObpoFRTdH7vsAUwJroozpS36h0i4WrMrk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:49c2:: with SMTP id w185mr26981788yba.294.1628011151536; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 10:19:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210802221431.2251210-1-surenb@google.com> <95eff329-a7b1-dc2d-026c-fd61e476c846@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <95eff329-a7b1-dc2d-026c-fd61e476c846@redhat.com> From: Suren Baghdasaryan Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 10:19:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mm: introduce process_mrelease system call To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko , Michal Hocko , David Rientjes , Matthew Wilcox , Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Rik van Riel , Minchan Kim , Christian Brauner , Christoph Hellwig , Oleg Nesterov , Jann Horn , Shakeel Butt , Andy Lutomirski , Christian Brauner , Florian Weimer , Jan Engelhardt , Tim Murray , Linux API , linux-mm , LKML , kernel-team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9C6B9D014D13 Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=TKDsSCcL; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of surenb@google.com designates 209.85.219.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=surenb@google.com X-Stat-Signature: 897uwbheam65hokqa86hzgfrtrneygn1 X-HE-Tag: 1628011152-286227 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 12:48 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: > > [...] > > > Previously I proposed a number of alternatives to accomplish this: > > - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1060407 extending > > I have no idea how stable these links are. Referencing via message id is > the common practice. For this link, we'd use > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190411014353.113252-3-surenb@google.com/ > > instead. Ack. > > > pidfd_send_signal to allow memory reaping using oom_reaper thread; > > - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1338196 extending > > pidfd_send_signal to reap memory of the target process synchronously from > > the context of the caller; > > - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1344419/ to add MADV_DONTNEED > > support for process_madvise implementing synchronous memory reaping. > > > > The end of the last discussion culminated with suggestion to introduce a > > dedicated system call (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1344418/#1553875) > > The reasoning was that the new variant of process_madvise > > a) does not work on an address range > > b) is destructive > > c) doesn't share much code at all with the rest of process_madvise > > From the userspace point of view it was awkward and inconvenient to provide > > memory range for this operation that operates on the entire address space. > > Using special flags or address values to specify the entire address space > > was too hacky. > > I'd condense this description and only reference previous discussions to > put a main focus on what this patch actually does. Like > > " > After previous discussions [1, 2, 3] the decision was made to introduce > a dedicated system call to cover this use case. > > ... > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190411014353.113252-3-surenb@google.com/ > " > Ack. > > > > The API is as follows, > > > > int process_mrelease(int pidfd, unsigned int flags); > > > > DESCRIPTION > > The process_mrelease() system call is used to free the memory of > > a process which was sent a SIGKILL signal. > > > > The pidfd selects the process referred to by the PID file > > descriptor. > > (See pidofd_open(2) for further information) > > > > The flags argument is reserved for future use; currently, this > > argument must be specified as 0. > > > > RETURN VALUE > > On success, process_mrelease() returns 0. On error, -1 is > > returned and errno is set to indicate the error. > > > > ERRORS > > EBADF pidfd is not a valid PID file descriptor. > > > > EAGAIN Failed to release part of the address space. > > > > EINTR The call was interrupted by a signal; see signal(7). > > > > EINVAL flags is not 0. > > > > EINVAL The task does not have a pending SIGKILL or its memory is > > shared with another process with no pending SIGKILL. > > Hm, I do wonder if it would make sense to have a mode (e.g., via a flag) > to reap all but shared memory from a dying process. Future work. Agree. Let's keep it simple for now and will expand when the need arises. > > > > > ENOSYS This system call is not supported by kernels built with no > > MMU support (CONFIG_MMU=n). > > Maybe "This system call is not supported, for example, without MMU > support built into Linux." Ack. > > > > > ESRCH The target process does not exist (i.e., it has terminated > > and been waited on). > > > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan > > --- > > changes in v4: > > - Replaced mmap_read_lock() with mmap_read_lock_killable(), per Michal Hocko > > - Added EINTR error in the manual pages documentation > > > > mm/oom_kill.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c > > index c729a4c4a1ac..86727794b0a8 100644 > > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c > > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c > > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -1141,3 +1142,60 @@ void pagefault_out_of_memory(void) > > out_of_memory(&oc); > > mutex_unlock(&oom_lock); > > } > > + > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(process_mrelease, int, pidfd, unsigned int, flags) > > +{ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU > > + struct mm_struct *mm = NULL; > > + struct task_struct *task; > > + unsigned int f_flags; > > + struct pid *pid; > > + long ret = 0; > > + > > + if (flags != 0) > > if (flags) Ack. > > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + pid = pidfd_get_pid(pidfd, &f_flags); > > + if (IS_ERR(pid)) > > + return PTR_ERR(pid); > > + > > + task = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); > > + if (!task) { > > + ret = -ESRCH; > > + goto put_pid; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * If the task is dying and in the process of releasing its memory > > + * then get its mm. > > + */ > > + task_lock(task); > > + if (task_will_free_mem(task) && (task->flags & PF_KTHREAD) == 0) { > > + mm = task->mm; > > + mmget(mm); > > + } > > + task_unlock(task); > > + if (!mm) { > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > + goto put_task; > > + } > > + > > + if (mmap_read_lock_killable(mm)) { > > + ret = -EINTR; > > + goto put_mm; > > + } > > + if (!__oom_reap_task_mm(mm)) > > + ret = -EAGAIN; > > I'm not an expert on __oom_reap_task_mm(), but the whole approach makes > sense to. So feel free to add my > > Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Thanks! I see Michal also asked for some documentation changes and a simple code change, so I won't roll your Acked-by automatically into the next version but would appreciate it on the final version :) Will post the next rev later today or tomorrow morning. Thanks for the review! > > -- > Thanks, > > David / dhildenb >