From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, david@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com,
jannh@google.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
paulmck@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, adobriyan@gmail.com,
brauner@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, yebin10@huawei.com,
linux@weissschuh.net, willy@infradead.org, osalvador@suse.de,
andrii@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, tjmercier@google.com,
kaleshsingh@google.com, aha310510@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] fs/proc/task_mmu: read proc/pid/maps under per-vma lock
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 07:29:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGRAL6YPqTR9SpPPuTamGJLdg4OEGmPUMERYDgjQCHAiA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd88b2fc-6963-454b-8cc0-7bd3360a562e@suse.cz>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 6:57 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On 7/16/25 05:05, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > With maple_tree supporting vma tree traversal under RCU and per-vma
> > locks, /proc/pid/maps can be read while holding individual vma locks
> > instead of locking the entire address space.
> > A completely lockless approach (walking vma tree under RCU) would be
> > quite complex with the main issue being get_vma_name() using callbacks
> > which might not work correctly with a stable vma copy, requiring
> > original (unstable) vma - see special_mapping_name() for example.
> >
> > When per-vma lock acquisition fails, we take the mmap_lock for reading,
> > lock the vma, release the mmap_lock and continue. This fallback to mmap
> > read lock guarantees the reader to make forward progress even during
> > lock contention. This will interfere with the writer but for a very
> > short time while we are acquiring the per-vma lock and only when there
> > was contention on the vma reader is interested in.
> >
> > We shouldn't see a repeated fallback to mmap read locks in practice, as
> > this require a very unlikely series of lock contentions (for instance
> > due to repeated vma split operations). However even if this did somehow
> > happen, we would still progress.
> >
> > One case requiring special handling is when a vma changes between the
> > time it was found and the time it got locked. A problematic case would
> > be if a vma got shrunk so that its vm_start moved higher in the address
> > space and a new vma was installed at the beginning:
> >
> > reader found: |--------VMA A--------|
> > VMA is modified: |-VMA B-|----VMA A----|
> > reader locks modified VMA A
> > reader reports VMA A: | gap |----VMA A----|
> >
> > This would result in reporting a gap in the address space that does not
> > exist. To prevent this we retry the lookup after locking the vma, however
> > we do that only when we identify a gap and detect that the address space
> > was changed after we found the vma.
> >
> > This change is designed to reduce mmap_lock contention and prevent a
> > process reading /proc/pid/maps files (often a low priority task, such
> > as monitoring/data collection services) from blocking address space
> > updates. Note that this change has a userspace visible disadvantage:
> > it allows for sub-page data tearing as opposed to the previous mechanism
> > where data tearing could happen only between pages of generated output
> > data. Since current userspace considers data tearing between pages to be
> > acceptable, we assume is will be able to handle sub-page data tearing
> > as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>
> Nit: the previous patch changed lines with e.g. -2UL to -2 and this seems
> changing the same lines to add a comment e.g. *ppos = -2; /* -2 indicates
> gate vma */
>
> That comment could have been added in the previous patch already. Also if
> you feel the need to add the comments, maybe it's time to just name those
> special values with a #define or something :)
Good point. I'll see if I can fit that into the next version.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 3:05 [PATCH v7 0/7] use per-vma locks for /proc/pid/maps reads Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] selftests/proc: add /proc/pid/maps tearing from vma split test Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 10:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 10:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-16 14:20 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 16:44 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] selftests/proc: extend /proc/pid/maps tearing test to include vma resizing Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] selftests/proc: extend /proc/pid/maps tearing test to include vma remapping Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] selftests/proc: test PROCMAP_QUERY ioctl while vma is concurrently modified Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 10:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 10:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-16 16:43 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] selftests/proc: add verbose more for tests to facilitate debugging Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] fs/proc/task_mmu: remove conversion of seq_file position to unsigned Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 10:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-16 3:05 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] fs/proc/task_mmu: read proc/pid/maps under per-vma lock Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-07-16 13:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-07-16 14:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2025-07-16 22:55 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] use per-vma locks for /proc/pid/maps reads Andrew Morton
2025-07-17 1:38 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuCfpGRAL6YPqTR9SpPPuTamGJLdg4OEGmPUMERYDgjQCHAiA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=aha310510@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yebin10@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).