From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f197.google.com (mail-qt0-f197.google.com [209.85.216.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1EB6B0003 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 07:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-f197.google.com with SMTP id n25so6546157qtl.13 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 04:26:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id k128sor1683655qke.106.2018.02.23.04.26.10 for (Google Transport Security); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 04:26:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180223110207.GA14446@saruman> References: <20180221233825.10024-1-jhogan@kernel.org> <20180223110207.GA14446@saruman> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:26:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Remove metag architecture Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: James Hogan Cc: "open list:METAG ARCHITECTURE" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Guenter Roeck , Jonathan Corbet , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Marc Zyngier , Daniel Lezcano , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Linus Walleij , Wim Van Sebroeck , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Wolfram Sang , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux-MM , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Linux Media Mailing List , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:02 PM, James Hogan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:26:58AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:38 AM, James Hogan wrote: >> > So lets call it a day and drop the Meta architecture port from the >> > kernel. RIP Meta. >> >> Since I brought up the architecture removal independently, I could >> pick this up into a git tree that also has the removal of some of the >> other architectures. >> >> I see your tree is part of linux-next, so you could also just put it >> in there and send a pull request at the merge window if you prefer. >> >> The only real reason I see for a shared git tree would be to avoid >> conflicts when we touch the same Kconfig files or #ifdefs in driver, >> but Meta only appears in >> >> config FRAME_POINTER >> bool "Compile the kernel with frame pointers" >> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && \ >> (CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || \ >> SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || \ >> ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS >> >> and >> >> include/trace/events/mmflags.h:#elif defined(CONFIG_PARISC) || >> defined(CONFIG_METAG) || defined(CONFIG_IA64) >> >> so there is little risk. > > I'm happy to put v2 in linux-next now (only patch 4 has changed, I just > sent an updated version), and send you a pull request early next week so > you can take it from there. The patches can't be directly applied with > git-am anyway thanks to the -D option to make them more concise. > > Sound okay? Yes, sounds good, thanks! Arnd -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org