linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	 linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,  X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] x86: use exit_lazy_tlb rather than membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:11:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrV5BzXuUYm5YAoEKPZZPfLrbHckvwBHzWKrxZS8hqzHEg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1607224014.8xeujbleij.astroid@bobo.none>

> On Dec 5, 2020, at 7:59 PM, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> I'm still going to persue shoot-lazies for the merge window. As you
> see it's about a dozen lines and a if (IS_ENABLED(... in core code.
> Your change is common code, but a significant complexity (which
> affects all archs) so needs a lot more review and testing at this
> point.

I don't think it's ready for this merge window.  I read the early
patches again, and I think they make the membarrier code worse, not
better.  I'm not fundamentally opposed to the shoot-lazies concept,
but it needs more thought and it needs a cleaner foundation.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-11  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-28 16:01 [PATCH 0/8] shoot lazy tlbs Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] lazy tlb: introduce exit_lazy_tlb Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-29  0:38   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02  2:49     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86: use exit_lazy_tlb rather than membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-28 17:55   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02  2:49     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-03  5:09       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-05  8:00         ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-05 16:11           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-05 23:14             ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-06  0:36               ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-06  3:59                 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-11  0:11                   ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2020-12-14  4:07                     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-14  5:53                       ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-30 14:57   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86: remove ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] lazy tlb: introduce lazy mm refcount helper functions Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] lazy tlb: allow lazy tlb mm switching to be configurable Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-29  0:36   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02  2:49     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] lazy tlb: shoot lazies, a non-refcounting lazy tlb option Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-29  3:54   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-29 20:16     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-30  9:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 18:31       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 21:27         ` Will Deacon
2020-12-01 21:50           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-01 23:04             ` Will Deacon
2020-12-02  3:47         ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-03  5:05           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-03 17:03         ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-12-03 17:14           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-03 18:33             ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-11-30  9:26     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30  9:30     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30  9:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02  3:09     ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-02 11:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 12:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 14:19   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 14:38     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-02 16:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] powerpc: use lazy mm refcount helper functions Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-28 16:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] powerpc/64s: enable MMU_LAZY_TLB_SHOOTDOWN Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrV5BzXuUYm5YAoEKPZZPfLrbHckvwBHzWKrxZS8hqzHEg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).