From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"elliott@hpe.com" <elliott@hpe.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHV5 3/3] x86, ras: Add __mcsafe_copy() function to recover from machine checks
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 19:40:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXAoUynioHVLErQgdYSPGcA_4__ZocjPmSg6-Mbn63aSA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+8MBbKqKp=AsKiNcaS+zcfw26KQj9CwcDLNqtYLECrt3T4W=g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com> wrote:
> Somehow this didn't get sent ... found it in the "Drafts" folder. But
> it's rubbish, skip to the
> bottom.
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I switched to BIAS 0xC0000000 ... and now I should get class 1 entries
>> (bit31=0, bit30=1).
>>
>> New patch series coming soon.
>
> Or not :-(
>
> arch/x86/lib/lib.a(memcpy_64.o):(__ex_table+0x4): relocation truncated
> to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against `.fixup'
> arch/x86/lib/lib.a(memcpy_64.o):(__ex_table+0xc): relocation truncated
> to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against `.fixup'
> ...
>
> I guess it was something like this that made you do the 0x20000000 and
> subtract the BIAS?
>
> I have a bad feeling that we may not really have four classes, just three:
>
> 00: no funny arithmetic
> 10: BIAS = 0x80000000 ... doesn't trigger truncation warning because
> sign bit is set
> 11: BIAS = 0x40000000 ... ditto
> 01: BIAS = ? ... Is there some magic value for BIAS that gets this?
>
> --- end of Draft ... now to the real bit
>
> Not sure why I was hung up on *subtracting* values to get the desired
> class bits. Just
> blindly copying the initial case from your patch?
>
> If you can't get from A to B one way, try going around the other
> direction. Subtracting
> 0xC0000000 is the same as adding 0x40000000 (when playing with u32 values).
> That doesn't upset the linker.
>
> I rebased:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ras/ras.git mcsafev6
>
> still needs a little cleanup, but it all works, and seems to be a much
> cleaner approach. So clean that I wonder whether I really need
> the CONFIG_MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY any more?? The only
> place it is used now is around the __mcsafe_copy()
>
Looks nice!
It might a bit clearer if you rename fix_class2 to fix_class_ex, etc,
and then use the C99 syntax for the table:
allclasses ... = {
[EXTABLE_CLASS_WHATEVER >> 30] = fix_class_whatever,
...
};
you could try "[extable_class(EXTABLE_CLASS_WHATEVER)] = fix_class_whatever"
Maybe rename EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT to EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT_OR_MC?
I might still attack this code later to add the indirect fixup idea
rather than just returning the fault number in EAX.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-03 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-24 20:54 [PATCHV4 0/3] Machine check recovery when kernel accesses poison Tony Luck
2015-12-16 1:29 ` [PATCHV4 1/3] x86, ras: Add new infrastructure for machine check fixup tables Tony Luck
2015-12-16 1:29 ` [PATCHV4 2/3] x86, ras: Extend machine check recovery code to annotated ring0 areas Tony Luck
2015-12-16 1:30 ` [PATCHV4 3/3] x86, ras: Add __mcsafe_copy() function to recover from machine checks Tony Luck
2015-12-24 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-16 1:30 ` [PATCHV5 " Tony Luck
2015-12-25 11:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-25 20:05 ` Luck, Tony
2015-12-26 10:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-26 14:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 2:08 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-27 2:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 2:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 6:57 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-27 10:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-27 12:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 13:17 ` Boris Petkov
2015-12-27 13:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 13:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-27 13:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-27 19:04 ` Dan Williams
2015-12-27 12:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-12-30 23:32 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-31 20:30 ` Tony Luck
2015-12-31 21:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-01 22:19 ` Tony Luck
2016-01-03 3:40 ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALCETrXAoUynioHVLErQgdYSPGcA_4__ZocjPmSg6-Mbn63aSA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).