* sl[aou]b allocator comparison
@ 2012-10-02 11:22 Ezequiel Garcia
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ezequiel Garcia @ 2012-10-02 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm
Hello,
I'd like to know what's the current status of each allocator regarding
its targeted scenario.
According to my numbers:
* slob
very small static footprint, low internal fragmentation, doesn't scale well.
targeted at really small embedded.
* slub
default allocator, low internal fragmentation, suites well most scenarios.
* slab
high internal fragmentation, we still have it because slub showed some unfixed
(performance?) regression in some scenario.
Anyone can add anything useful to this quick comparison?
Thanks,
Ezequiel.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-10-02 11:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-02 11:22 sl[aou]b allocator comparison Ezequiel Garcia
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).