linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/2] mm: memcg detect no memcgs above softlimit under zone reclaim
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:04:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALWz4iwzJp8EwSeP6ap7_adW6sF8YR940sky6vJS3SD8FO6HkA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120801084553.GD4436@tiehlicka.suse.cz>

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Tue 31-07-12 13:59:35, Ying Han wrote:
> [...]
>> Let's say the following example where the cgroup is sorted by css_id,
>> and none of the cgroup's usage is above softlimit (except root)
>>
>>                                         root  a  b  c  d  e f ...max
>> thread_1 (priority = 12)         ^
>>                                          iter->position = 1        (
>> over_softlimit = true )
>>
>>                                                 ^
>>                                                  iter->position = 2
>>
>> thread_2 (priority = 12)                     ^
>>                                                      iter->position = 3
>>
>>                                                       ....
>>                                                                           ^
>>
>>    iter->position = 0  ( over_softlimit = false )
>>
>> In this case, thread 1 gets root but not thread 2 since they share the
>> walk under same zone (same node) and same reclaim priority.
>
> That is true iterator is per zone per priority if the cookie is used but
> that wasn't my point.
> Take a much simpler case. Just the background reclaim without any direct
> reclaim. Then there is nobody to race with and so we would always visit
> the whole tree including the root and so if no group is above the soft
> limit we would hammer the root cgroup until priority gets down when we
> ignore the limit and reclaim from all. Makes sense?

That is true. Hmm, then two things i can do:

1. for kswapd case, make sure not counting the root cgroup
2. or check nr_scanned. I like the nr_scanned which is telling us
whether or not the reclaim ever make any attempt ?

--Ying

> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-01 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-30 22:32 [PATCH V7 2/2] mm: memcg detect no memcgs above softlimit under zone reclaim Ying Han
2012-07-31 15:59 ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 16:07   ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-31 17:52     ` Ying Han
2012-07-31 17:54   ` Ying Han
2012-07-31 20:02     ` Michal Hocko
2012-07-31 20:59       ` Ying Han
2012-08-01  8:45         ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-01 19:04           ` Ying Han [this message]
2012-08-01 20:10             ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-02  0:09               ` Ying Han
2012-08-02  0:43                 ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-06 14:03               ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-06 14:27                 ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-06 15:11                   ` Michal Hocko
2012-08-06 18:51                     ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-06 21:18                       ` Ying Han
2012-08-06 22:54                         ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALWz4iwzJp8EwSeP6ap7_adW6sF8YR940sky6vJS3SD8FO6HkA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yinghan@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).