From: Abhinav Kochhar <kochhar.abhinav@gmail.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 0/4] ARM: replace custom consistent dma region with vmalloc
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:02:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALYq+qSMPoVC5OF+oBbt_i7O+_fmogLCtpqTAqHbsv1TcKrPdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334325950-7881-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3526 bytes --]
Hi,
I see a bottle-neck with the current dma-mapping framework.
Issue seems to be with the Virtual memory allocation for access in kernel
address space.
1. In "arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c" there is a initialization call to
"consistent_init". It reserves size 32MB of Kernel Address space.
2. "consistent_init" allocates memory for kernel page directory and page
tables.
3. "__iommu_alloc_remap" function allocates virtual memory region in kernel
address space reserved in step 1.
4. "__iommu_alloc_remap" function then maps the allocated pages to the
address space reserved in step 3.
Since the virtual memory area allocated for mapping these pages in kernel
address space is only 32MB,
eventually the calls for allocation and mapping new pages into kernel
address space are going to fail once 32 MB is exhausted.
e.g., For Exynos 5 platform Each framebuffer for 1280x800 resolution
consumes around 4MB.
We have a scenario where X11 DRI driver would allocate Non-contig pages for
all "Pixmaps" through arm_iommu_alloc_attrs" function which will follow the
path given above in steps 1 - 4.
Now the problem is the size limitation of 32MB. We may want to allocate
more than 8 such buffers when X11 DRI driver is integrated.
Possible solutions:
1. Why do we need to create a kernel virtual address space? Are we going to
access these pages in kernel using this address?
If we are not going to access anything in kernel then why do we need to map
these pages in kernel address space?. If we can avoid this then the problem
can be solved.
OR
2 Is it used for only book-keeping to retrieve "struct pages" later on for
passing/mapping to different devices?
If yes, then we have to find another way.
For "dmabuf" framework one solution could be to add a new member variable
"pages" in the exporting driver's local object and use that for
passing/mapping to different devices.
Moreover, even if we increase to say 64 MB that would not be enough for our
use, we never know how many graphic applications would be spawned by the
user.
Let me know your opinion on this.
Regards,
Abhinav
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com
> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recent changes to ioremap and unification of vmalloc regions on ARM
> significantly reduces the possible size of the consistent dma region and
> limited allowed dma coherent/writecombine allocations.
>
> This experimental patch series replaces custom consistent dma regions
> usage in dma-mapping framework in favour of generic vmalloc areas
> created on demand for each coherent and writecombine allocations.
>
> This patch is based on vanilla v3.4-rc2 release.
>
> Best regards
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung Poland R&D Center
>
>
> Patch summary:
>
> Marek Szyprowski (4):
> mm: vmalloc: use const void * for caller argument
> mm: vmalloc: export find_vm_area() function
> mm: vmalloc: add VM_DMA flag to indicate areas used by dma-mapping
> framework
> ARM: remove consistent dma region and use common vmalloc range for
> dma allocations
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 220
> +++++++-----------------------------
> include/linux/vmalloc.h | 10 +-
> mm/vmalloc.c | 31 ++++--
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 196 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.1.569.g6f426
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linaro-mm-sig mailing list
> Linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-mm-sig
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4375 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 14:05 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: replace custom consistent dma region with vmalloc Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: vmalloc: use const void * for caller argument Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: vmalloc: export find_vm_area() function Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: vmalloc: add VM_DMA flag to indicate areas used by dma-mapping framework Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: remove consistent dma region and use common vmalloc range for dma allocations Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 18:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-16 1:32 ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-17 18:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-23 12:02 ` Abhinav Kochhar [this message]
2012-04-23 20:58 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 0/4] ARM: replace custom consistent dma region with vmalloc Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALYq+qSMPoVC5OF+oBbt_i7O+_fmogLCtpqTAqHbsv1TcKrPdA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kochhar.abhinav@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).