From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F224CC433FF for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0822184E for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="T8SEdQkm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8E0822184E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E913A6B0003; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:02:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E41BD6B0006; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:02:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D58366B0007; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:02:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from mail-pf1-f200.google.com (mail-pf1-f200.google.com [209.85.210.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CA16B0003 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 11:02:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 191so59245178pfy.20 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:02:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:dkim-signature:mime-version:references :in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ExbLywp2n4riKzI1gMtYZu/WQrgrjE4vGU5JEUkphOM=; b=iG3v0ITCVdBNxhdGQA1vAsxbWLoa5qIOTsJbjp8DmN8Bg8z2xV4kJX03biPSW6wALI cd+Ckc23tdvM96ZhnYr1GIZCT+gkbZyJqBnkwshGt2Hm75ENIKqqxnr7MnlV7HqpO/+u VxN2HvBDk5iUdjDy5AwZb64Sq34FCODClcgDqsaLoMrZG3bxB8D8Q1HbGGGf1UfSNakD /DvRAJYYx+8gV4YEqrDiMWz2qFG0HHYsC6uGtpLApCarluX0hAjjP8crOc3p/+0Djna0 Kje6APXYxtG30yKDWxiE4UuRk6KHLE4vzzrycabQ7xEftYrYjRQMs8TByup9xlsktH06 /EGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqVmf5P1SzgDrdBjnGavl6STNT/X+wme7Ypx1XOg4GmwaPzeCw VZGvBNzWTnH2wTh9sMaM4jcDycnZIAekhydzWWgofsQuv6vl55Q2k9hoUVd3R4ioRCRnxsL09iS LXVJF/lSkIYUxbBzKecNnlkkqz4zXN+xFQe3oh6i3YY0OLrSlUF4Uf0/FcdjLGhaYbA== X-Received: by 2002:a62:e716:: with SMTP id s22mr15917694pfh.250.1565276564224; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:02:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzFPJ+rRjbJtb48d6zxdS5T024ZRsrEdoMM5/xGfScpkmI3H4ytpiWn5LwhUWR10pHuZ7bh X-Received: by 2002:a62:e716:: with SMTP id s22mr15917621pfh.250.1565276563309; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:02:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565276563; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UKVfmRjAAig+Bog/o7CDvokYNiHWNpgDoMonx0MBPq9FcQ4q/mx+3PIgR3WYWb3SLu xLy05GKUn5ETDs4nqsD8/jtDRM0PQdTJiE/EW+05RcJ/04f6uNikRVYNTik86q8r0kSz UVPx39lyi3bfgPabf8cKR88mkv8HkpyXdKV4HknwEdeX3fg9COSPMGdIzRGjXe/x0Gsm H08Q7W4tJ7fm2QdOna9HKhbsS/zzEw/3ttWK4oj3vLBOfHnrYtom5mvzLoKRJTeQgKvW cSQB660mHKVmOYtKga4yj2Y/zkT2I0pBDPeTbTYcmTCN1gNQbilVHLONBixz402azDHR +q3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=ExbLywp2n4riKzI1gMtYZu/WQrgrjE4vGU5JEUkphOM=; b=EqKtS3dzGB8Un+CggKCyV5V7UeJd4QNTwQxtcETf7zjBgpDUee/usnN1iaHZOmR3X+ qE4zlcd5k+08kKSmBX273xLVXsmRiFinOuvWG6ibbFUY6vRYdHOTlG+8P2HF0eISSnwV sdSl0XiV3UWNMCRnDMmz6jEpEmCh1ER6WlhBmqFkCtnSWwi4ZUrBUO0ZdCme5hBBx4iE RAB+8pnJchpFr0wjt4e2ppCkRtHWvqzo6F3s7zbC+LwQWNE3tU5xveV0eAxlxVFpwEAS 6yLbisxF5nmhqFNlsDOwYOP92JVn3mtxQ81UjJfGwzECj6GBKaqGtLoQMEa+dVPmZT2r 1llA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=T8SEdQkm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of robh+dt@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robh+dt@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org. [198.145.29.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d1si47387409pla.75.2019.08.08.08.02.43 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of robh+dt@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=198.145.29.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=T8SEdQkm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of robh+dt@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robh+dt@kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from mail-qt1-f170.google.com (mail-qt1-f170.google.com [209.85.160.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DF5321882 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:02:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1565276562; bh=dyMO+YEym8ib/r3ptFxeHa3pBfgJ53Bab+zG1JtBiD8=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=T8SEdQkmyDZjxpkvg3O5aa5y0IUhZYhli6BHqmZLmfiiG7lkr51b/UqgTFh1RGV+e MfHwocgqqK6CPBSQL1LeWybLWFp8cKihuFna7gkTOy+M2wAZon7MndaSRynprNtU82 2zgEQWoOZhEBTgp3ROz8ugCpgJEPPuHt0voaKgmo= Received: by mail-qt1-f170.google.com with SMTP id x22so19047854qtp.12 for ; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:02:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7593:: with SMTP id s19mr6019854qtq.136.1565276561735; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 08:02:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190731154752.16557-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <20190731154752.16557-4-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> <2050374ac07e0330e505c4a1637256428adb10c4.camel@suse.de> <12eb3aba207c552e5eb727535e7c4f08673c4c80.camel@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <12eb3aba207c552e5eb727535e7c4f08673c4c80.camel@suse.de> From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 09:02:30 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] of/fdt: add function to get the SoC wide DMA addressable memory size To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Christoph Hellwig , wahrenst@gmx.net, Marc Zyngier , Robin Murphy , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux IOMMU , linux-mm@kvack.org, Frank Rowand , phill@raspberryi.org, Florian Fainelli , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Anholt , Matthias Brugger , Andrew Morton , Marek Szyprowski , "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 12:12 PM Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 13:23 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:03 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > wrote: > > > Hi Rob, > > > Thanks for the review! > > > > > > On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:17 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:48 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne > > > > wrote: > > > > > Some SoCs might have multiple interconnects each with their own DMA > > > > > addressing limitations. This function parses the 'dma-ranges' on each of > > > > > them and tries to guess the maximum SoC wide DMA addressable memory > > > > > size. > > > > > > > > > > This is specially useful for arch code in order to properly setup CMA > > > > > and memory zones. > > > > > > > > We already have a way to setup CMA in reserved-memory, so why is this > > > > needed for that? > > > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong but I got the feeling you got the point of the patch > > > later on. > > > > No, for CMA I don't. Can't we already pass a size and location for CMA > > region under /reserved-memory. The only advantage here is perhaps the > > CMA range could be anywhere in the DMA zone vs. a fixed location. > > Now I get it, sorry I wasn't aware of that interface. > > Still, I'm not convinced it matches RPi's use case as this would hard-code > CMA's size. Most people won't care, but for the ones that do, it's nicer to > change the value from the kernel command line than editing the dtb. Sure, I fully agree and am not a fan of the CMA DT overlays I've seen. > I get that > if you need to, for example, reserve some memory for the video to work, it's > silly not to hard-code it. Yet due to the board's nature and users base I say > it's important to favor flexibility. It would also break compatibility with > earlier versions of the board and diverge from the downstream kernel behaviour. > Which is a bigger issue than it seems as most users don't always understand > which kernel they are running and unknowingly copy configuration options from > forums. > > As I also need to know the DMA addressing limitations to properly configure > memory zones and dma-direct. Setting up the proper CMA constraints during the > arch's init will be trivial anyway. It was really just commentary on commit text as for CMA alone we have a solution already. I agree on the need for zones. > > > > > IMO, I'd just do: > > > > > > > > if (of_fdt_machine_is_compatible(blob, "brcm,bcm2711")) > > > > dma_zone_size = XX; > > > > > > > > 2 lines of code is much easier to maintain than 10s of incomplete code > > > > and is clearer who needs this. Maybe if we have dozens of SoCs with > > > > this problem we should start parsing dma-ranges. > > > > > > FYI that's what arm32 is doing at the moment and was my first instinct. But > > > it > > > seems that arm64 has been able to survive so far without any machine > > > specific > > > code and I have the feeling Catalin and Will will not be happy about this > > > solution. Am I wrong? > > > > No doubt. I'm fine if the 2 lines live in drivers/of/. > > > > Note that I'm trying to reduce the number of early_init_dt_scan_* > > calls from arch code into the DT code so there's more commonality > > across architectures in the early DT scans. So ideally, this can all > > be handled under early_init_dt_scan() call. > > How does this look? (I'll split it in two patches and add a comment explaining > why dt_dma_zone_size is needed) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c > index f2444c61a136..1395be40b722 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c > @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ > > #include "of_private.h" > > +u64 dt_dma_zone_size __ro_after_init; Avoiding a call from arch code by just having a variable isn't really better. I'd rather see a common, non DT specific variable that can be adjusted. Something similar to initrd_start/end. Then the arch code doesn't have to care what hardware description code adjusted the value. Rob