From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com [209.85.167.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5436B05EF for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 07:26:46 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id z10so2523107lfe.21 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id 96-v6sor2400270lja.27.2018.11.08.04.26.43 for (Google Transport Security); Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:26:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1530853846-30215-1-git-send-email-ks77sj@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?6rmA7KKF7ISd?= Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:26:33 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] z3fold: fix wrong handling of headless pages Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f1ffdf057a26581c" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vitaly Wool Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , LKML --000000000000f1ffdf057a26581c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Vitaly, thank you for the reply. I agree your a new solution is more comprehensive and drop my patch is simple way. But, I think it's not fair. If my previous patch was not wrong, is (my patch -> your patch) the right way? Best regards, Jongseok > 2018=EB=85=84 11=EC=9B=94 6=EC=9D=BC (=ED=99=94) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 4:48,= Vitaly Wool =EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1: > Hi Jongseok, > thank you for your work, we've now got a more comprehensive solution: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/5/726 > Would you please confirm that it works for you? Also, would you be >okay with dropping your patch in favor of the new one? > ~Vitaly --000000000000f1ffdf057a26581c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi= Vitaly,
thank you for the reply.

I agree your a new solution is more comprehensive and dr= op my patch is simple way.
But, I think it's not fair.
If= my previous patch was not wrong, is (my patch -> your patch) the right = way?

Best regards,
Jongseok

> 2018=EB=85=84 11=EC= =9B=94 6=EC=9D=BC (=ED=99=94) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 4:48, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>=EB=8B=98= =EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1:
> Hi Jongseok,
> thank you for your work, we've now got a more comprehensive = solution:
>=C2=A0https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/5/726
> Would you please confirm that it works for you? Also, would you = be
>okay with dropping your patch in favor of the new one?

>= ; ~Vitaly
--000000000000f1ffdf057a26581c--