From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FCF6B0035 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 03:31:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ik5so1677900vcb.18 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vc0-x233.google.com (mail-vc0-x233.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c03::233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j5si5145721veb.21.2014.04.30.00.31.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ij19so1675018vcb.38 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:31:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:31:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Question regarding memory maps in VFS From: Maksym Planeta Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: linux-mm@kvack.org Hello, are there any invariants for f->f_mapping, f->f_inode->i_mapping and f->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mapping (where f is struct file*)? And what is the difference between these pointers? -- Regards, Maksym Planeta. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org