From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Andrey Konovalov" <andreyknvl@google.com>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Joonsoo Kim" <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@purestorage.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"SeongJae Park" <sjpark@amazon.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 16:54:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNNko4pYa3zrzWOVROZF8RGsaH4tNffZrDOaNpVa2ZkNRA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201030154745.GD50718@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 16:47, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:16:43PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Add architecture specific implementation details for KFENCE and enable
> > KFENCE for the arm64 architecture. In particular, this implements the
> > required interface in <asm/kfence.h>.
> >
> > KFENCE requires that attributes for pages from its memory pool can
> > individually be set. Therefore, force the entire linear map to be mapped
> > at page granularity. Doing so may result in extra memory allocated for
> > page tables in case rodata=full is not set; however, currently
> > CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED=y is the default, and the common case
> > is therefore not affected by this change.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> > ---
> > v5:
> > * Move generic page allocation code to core.c [suggested by Jann Horn].
> > * Remove comment about HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE_STATIC_POOL, since we no longer
> > support static pools.
> > * Force page granularity for the linear map [suggested by Mark Rutland].
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 4 ++++
> > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > index f858c352f72a..2f8b32dddd8b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ config ARM64
> > select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
> > select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN if !(ARM64_16K_PAGES && ARM64_VA_BITS_48)
> > select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN_SW_TAGS if HAVE_ARCH_KASAN
> > + select HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE if (!ARM64_16K_PAGES && !ARM64_64K_PAGES)
>
> Why does this depend on the page size?
>
> If this is functional, but has a larger overhead on 16K or 64K, I'd
> suggest removing the dependency, and just updating the Kconfig help text
> to explain that.
Good point, I don't think anything is requiring us to force 4K pages.
Let's remove it.
Thanks,
-- Marco
> Otherwise, this patch looks fine to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-30 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-29 13:16 [PATCH v6 0/9] KFENCE: A low-overhead sampling-based memory safety error detector Marco Elver
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 19:16 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] x86, kfence: enable KFENCE for x86 Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 13:00 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-30 15:22 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64 Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 16:00 ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-30 15:47 ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-30 15:54 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLAB Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 15:41 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLUB Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] kfence, kasan: make KFENCE compatible with KASAN Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 13:46 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-30 15:08 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 15:19 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] kfence, Documentation: add KFENCE documentation Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 9:59 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] kfence: add test suite Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:49 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 10:50 ` Marco Elver
2020-10-29 13:16 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for KFENCE Marco Elver
2020-10-30 2:50 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-30 2:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] KFENCE: A low-overhead sampling-based memory safety error detector Jann Horn
2020-10-30 10:56 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANpmjNNko4pYa3zrzWOVROZF8RGsaH4tNffZrDOaNpVa2ZkNRA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joern@purestorage.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=sjpark@amazon.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).